Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Energy uniqueness for homogeneous Dirichlet waves on bounded domains

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let c>0, T>0, let n≥1 and let U⊆Rn be a bounded open interval if n=1, or a bounded connected C1 domain if n≥2 (Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals) and let u∈C2(U‾×[0,T]) solve □cu=0 on U×(0,T) with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary data u(⋅,t)∣∂U=0 for every t∈(0,T) and homogeneous initial data u(⋅,0)=ut(⋅,0)=0. Then u≡0 on U‾×[0,T]. More generally, two such Dirichlet solutions with equal initial data agree on U‾×[0,T].

The trace condition u∣∂U=0 is stated explicitly because it is exactly the boundary flux that is being killed. Connectedness is retained so the proof can treat U as one spatial component; the same argument applies componentwise on a disconnected domain with the corresponding boundary regularity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω; a bounded interval (n=1) or bounded connected C1 domain (n≥2) U, a C2 function u on U‾×[0,T] solving □cu=0 on U×(0,T) with u=0 on ∂U×(0,T) and u(⋅,0)=ut(⋅,0)=0; the energy density e=12(ut2+c2∣Du∣2)≥0 of Wave energy density, energy flux and total energy and EU(t)=∫Ue(x,t) dx.

[F1]

Conservation in case (c): for a bounded C1 domain with homogeneous Dirichlet data, EU is constant on (0,T). (Conservation of total wave energy in three admissible settings)

[F2]

A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere; a continuous function on U that vanishes almost everywhere vanishes identically, because a positive value at one point persists on a ball of positive measure. (A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere)

[F3]

Every connected component of an open subset of Rn is open and polygonally connected, and any two points of a polygonally connected set are joined by a polygonal path inside it. (Every connected component of an open subset of Rn is open and polygonally connected, Polygonal paths and polygonally connected subsets of Rn)

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebraF6

Vanishing of the density and of the first derivatives: EU(0)=0 because ut(⋅,0)=Du(⋅,0)=0; since e is continuous on the compact set U‾×[0,T], it is uniformly continuous there, and boundedness of U gives ∣EU(t)−EU(0)∣≤λn(U)sup⁡x∈U‾∣e(x,t)−e(x,0)∣→0 as t↓0. By [F1], EU is constant on (0,T), so this continuity identifies that constant with EU(0)=0; for each t∈(0,T), nonnegativity and continuity of e together with [F2] give e(⋅,t)=0 on U, hence ut(⋅,t)=0 and Du(⋅,t)=0 there, and continuity of these derivatives extends their vanishing to t=0 and t=T.

2.1givenstep 1.1F3F4F5algebra

Spatial constancy on the connected domain: fix t and p,q∈U; since U is open and connected, [F3] supplies a polygonal path in U from p to q, say with successive vertices p=a0,…,am=q; for each segment put g(s):=u(aj−1+s(aj−aj−1),t) for s∈[0,1]; by the chain rule [F5], g is continuous on [0,1] and differentiable there with g′(s)=Du(aj−1+s(aj−aj−1),t)⋅(aj−aj−1)=0, so [F4] makes g constant; chaining over j=1,…,m gives u(p,t)=u(q,t), so u(⋅,t) is constant on U.

3.1givenstep 2.1algebra

The constant is zero: U is nonempty, bounded and open, so ∂U≠∅; fix t∈[0,T] and q∈∂U and a sequence pk∈U with pk→q; by step 2.1, u(pk,t)=u(p1,t) for all k, while continuity of u on U‾×[0,T] and the boundary condition give u(pk,t)→u(q,t)=0; hence u(⋅,t)≡0 on U, and by continuity on U‾.

4.1givenstep 3.1F5∎

Uniqueness for two solutions: if u and v are two such Dirichlet solutions with equal initial data, their difference w:=u−v is C2 on U‾×[0,T], solves □cw=0 there by linearity [F5], vanishes on ∂U×(0,T) and has w(⋅,0)=wt(⋅,0)=0; steps 1.1–3.1 applied to w give w≡0 on U‾×[0,T], that is, u=v.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

112 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources