How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exposure-adjusted Gamma-Poisson conjugate update
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let , , and in shape-rate convention. Conditional on , let be independent with for , where each fixed exposure . The data space has counting measure. If some but , the likelihood and evidence are zero and no posterior quotient is defined. Otherwise put , , and with the empty product one. Then and the posterior is . This includes all-zero exposures with zero counts, for which the posterior equals the prior.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , finite nonnegative exposures, and a finite count vector .
Countable Choice is used by the Gamma density normalization supplier. The Axiom of Countable Choice ().
The shape-rate Gamma density is and is normalized for . Shape-rate Gamma distribution.
A zero exposure gives a point mass at zero; for positive exposure the Poisson mass is . Exposure-parameterized Poisson law.
The Gamma kernel has finite positive Lebesgue integral, and its normalized shape-rate density integrates to one. The shape-rate Gamma density is normalized.
The specified proper prior and parameter-measurable sampling probability kernel form a Bayesian model. Bayesian model as a prior and sampling kernel.
Evidence is the prior integral of the likelihood section, and a quotient is defined only for finite positive evidence. Evidence normalizer and fiberwise posterior update.
Probability normalization of the likelihood-weighted prior is equivalent to finite positive evidence. Fiberwise posterior propriety is equivalent to finite positive evidence.
The dominated Bayes formula identifies the normalized density quotient as a posterior kernel. Bayes formula for dominated kernels.
For fixed and , the factors and are continuous in ; at the count mass is constant in . Finite sums, scalar multiples and increasing limits of measurable functions remain measurable. Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers The exponential function is smooth and Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral.
Continuous maps have Borel preimages of Borel sets, and the finite product data space has its product sigma-algebra. A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates.
Proof
Given: Countable Choice, the hypotheses in the Statement and observed .
For fixed and , the mass is continuous on by [F8]; for it is the constant , also continuous. Conditional independence gives the data mass , continuous in for each fixed (and equal to for the empty sample), hence Borel by [F9]. The count space is a countable union of the finite boxes and has its discrete sigma-algebra, so is jointly measurable on : for each Borel , its inverse image is the countable union over of the Borel section . For any data event , its probability under parameter is ; the sums over are finite and increase to this value, so is measurable by [F8]. For each , conditional independence and the normalized marginal Poisson laws [F2] make a probability measure; the empty sample gives the point mass on its singleton data space. Thus is a probability kernel and is the jointly measurable density required by [F7]. If some and , [F2] makes the likelihood factor zero and its evidence zero by [F5]. Otherwise whenever , and multiplying the mass factors in [F2] gives . The constant is finite and positive, including when there are no positive exposures; the prior [F1] and kernel give the Bayesian model [F4].
Multiply the likelihood from step 1.1 by the prior density [F1]. The parameter-dependent part is Because and , integrating this expression and applying [F3] with shape and rate yields the displayed evidence. Every factor is finite and strictly positive.
Dividing by that evidence leaves the normalized Gamma density by [F3]. Its evidence is finite positive, so [F5] and [F6] permit the update and [F7] identifies it as the posterior kernel. When all exposures and counts vanish, and the formula is the original prior density.
Depends on
- Shape-rate Gamma distribution
- The shape-rate Gamma density is normalized
- Exposure-parameterized Poisson law
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Bayesian model as a prior and sampling kernel
- Evidence normalizer and fiberwise posterior update
- Fiberwise posterior propriety is equivalent to finite positive evidence
- Bayes formula for dominated kernels
- Measure kernel and probability kernel
- The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
- Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers
- The exponential function is smooth and $(\exp)'=\exp$
- Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function
- A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets
- Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
78 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gelman et al., Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed., §§2.1, 2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Johnson, Ott & Dogucu, Bayes Rules!, Chapter 5, §5.2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)