How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact squared-error risk of an isotropic projection fit
Statement
Let , let be fixed, and put and . Let be the orthogonal projection and let be fixed. Let be a centered random vector with square-integrable coordinates satisfying for . For and as in Fixed-design least squares as orthogonal projection,
In particular, when , the expected squared fitted-value error is exactly . The moment assumptions hold for centered Gaussian noise with covariance matrix ; Gaussianity is not otherwise needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A fixed design matrix , its column space , the projection , a fixed , and the centered second-moment assumptions on in the statement.
The fixed-design fitted vector is the orthogonal projection of the observed vector onto the design column space (Fixed-design least squares as orthogonal projection).
The projection is characterized by and (The orthogonal projection is the -component in ).
An orthogonal projection is linear (Finite-dimensional orthogonal projections are linear and contractive).
A finite-dimensional real inner-product space has an orthonormal basis, with the empty basis in dimension zero (Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis).
Orthogonal vectors satisfy Pythagoras (Pythagoras, the parallelogram identity, and the real and complex polarisation identities).
For square-integrable real variables, variance and covariance are the expectations of centered products (Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space).
Expectation is additive on finite sums of integrable variables (Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation).
Risk is the expected loss of a decision rule under the sampling law (Loss functions and risk).
Proof
Put and . By [F2], and . Linearity [F3] gives .
Choose an orthonormal basis of by [F4]. The vector lies in and its residual from is orthogonal to every basis vector, hence to ; uniqueness in [F2] identifies it with . Orthonormality therefore gives , with the empty sum equal to zero when .
Write . By [F6] and the given coordinate second moments, for each . Summing with [F7] shows .
The two summands in step 1.1 are orthogonal, so [F5] gives pointwise. Taking expectations and using [F7] separates the fixed first term from the noise term.
Substitute step 1.3 into step 2.1 to obtain the displayed identity. If , then by [F2], giving the stated special case. By [F8], its left side is the risk under squared fitted-value loss.
Depends on
- Fixed-design least squares as orthogonal projection
- The orthogonal projection $P_Wv$ is the $W$-component in $V=W\oplus W^\perp$
- Finite-dimensional orthogonal projections are linear and contractive
- Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Pythagoras, the parallelogram identity, and the real and complex polarisation identities
- Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation
- Loss functions and risk
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Philippe Rigollet and Jan-Christian Hütter, High-Dimensional Statistics: Lecture Notes, Chapter 2, Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sylvain Arlot, Model/estimator selection, Lecture on model selection, §§1–2 (standard reference, not scraped)