How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The gl(1|1) bracket data define a Lie superalgebra
Statement
The graded vector space and bracket of Bracket data for gl(1|1) satisfy the complex Lie-superalgebra axioms. With , , and , they also give the triangular decomposition required by Triangular decomposition of a Lie superalgebra. We denote this Lie superalgebra by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The bracket data of Bracket data for gl(1|1).
Bracket data for gl(1|1): are even, odd, the even basis elements commute, , , and are given by the displayed table.
Lie superalgebra over the complex numbers: a Lie superalgebra bracket must be graded, graded-skew, and satisfy signed Jacobi and the separately listed odd self-Jacobi identity; over , the latter follows from signed Jacobi.
Triangular decomposition of a Lie superalgebra: the triangular subalgebras must be graded, even abelian, their direct sum must be the full graded vector space, and must be a subalgebra.
Proof
The bracket table is homogeneous: even–even brackets lie in the even part, even–odd brackets in the odd part, and odd–odd brackets in the even part. Its odd–odd entries are symmetric and its even–odd reverse entries are their negatives, so it satisfies graded skew symmetry in [F2].
For homogeneous , put . Graded skew symmetry gives and ; cyclic rotation preserves by its formula. Hence the derivation Jacobi identity is equivalent to , and it suffices to check representative basis triples up to permutation. For representatives with or , the commuting diagonal actions of have weights and , so . All-even brackets vanish, so all-even triples also satisfy Jacobi.
Put . By [F1], . For a triple , the Jacobi identity reduces to ; the two terms on the right are opposite multiples of , so their sum is zero. For or , every term vanishes because . This checks all basis triples with one even and two odd entries.
For three odd basis entries, each inner bracket is either zero or , and every outer bracket of with or is zero by step 2.1. Hence every nested-bracket term vanishes. Together with the representative even and mixed checks from step 1.2 and step 2.1, permutation reduction and multilinearity give signed Jacobi for all homogeneous triples.
For any odd , put . Applying the signed Jacobi identity from [F2] to gives , while graded skew symmetry and the even parity of give . Hence , and because has characteristic zero. This proves the additional odd self-Jacobi clause, so the bracket satisfies the full complex Lie-superalgebra axioms.
The subspaces are graded subalgebras: is abelian, and . Their direct sum is . The table gives , so is a subalgebra as well. These are precisely the conditions in [F3].
Depends on
Used by
- Finite-dimensional Lie supermodule categories need not be semisimple Counterexample
- Two-dimensional highest-weight module data for gl(1|1) Definition
- Typical and atypical highest weights for gl(1|1) Definition
- An odd abelian subalgebra has an exterior enveloping algebra Example
- The typicality boundary in a gl(1|1) highest-weight module Example
- The two-dimensional gl(1|1) action is well-defined Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sigiswald Barbier, A minimal representation for the orthosymplectic Lie-superalgebra, §§2.2 and 2.3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Victor Kac, Classification of Supersymmetries, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)