Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations for smooth projective varieties

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited from the analytic suppliers below. Let X be a compact Kähler n-fold in the conventions of Compact Kähler and rational Hodge polarization conventions, with Kähler form ω, and let 0≤k≤n. For this proof also write Qk for the same form on all of Hk, and on the primitive space Pk put Qk(a,b)=ϵ(k)∫Xa∧b∧ωn−k, where a,b are closed smooth representatives of the classes and the integral is independent of the representatives. This form is (−1)k-symmetric, pairs Pp,q only with Pq,p, and for nonzero a∈Pp,q satisfies ip−qQk(a,aˉ)=(n−k)! ∥aharm∥L22>0. If [ω]=ℓ∈H2(X;Q), then Qk is a rational polarization of Pk, and full Hk is polarized by the orthogonal direct sum form Sk that on LrPk−2r is (−1)rQk, equivalently Sk(Lru,Lrv)=Qk−2r(u,v) for u,v∈Pk−2r; degrees k>n are polarized by transporting the polarization of H2n−k along Lk−n, with Tate shift. For every real Kähler class the same positivity and nondegeneracy statements hold, without rationality. In particular this applies to smooth closed complex projective submanifolds of projective space with a hyperplane polarization, hence to smooth projective complex varieties through their smooth projective analytifications; more generally it applies to every real Kähler class, including ℓ+ϵη when represented by a positive closed form. For any continuous family of Kähler classes the primitive kernels (of every fixed degree 0≤k≤n) vary continuously as subspaces; rational primitive spaces are asserted only at rational classes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact Kähler n-fold X with Kähler form ω and a degree 0≤k≤n.

[F1]

The conventions for Kähler forms, the orientation, the Hodge star, the L2 pairing ⟨α,β⟩=∫Xα∧∗βˉ, the Weil operator C and polarizations are those of Compact Kähler and rational Hodge polarization conventions.

[F2]

For a primitive form u of type (p,q) and degree k, the pointwise Weil star identity is ∗u=ϵ(k)iq−pLn−ku/(n−k)!, and primitive harmonic forms are exactly the harmonic forms in ker⁡Λ (Hermitian exterior Lefschetz decomposition and Weil star identity).

[F3]

On the compact Kähler manifold the hard-Lefschetz maps Ln−j:Hj→H2n−j are isomorphisms for 0≤j≤n, Pk=ker⁡(Ln−k+1) for 0≤k≤n, Hj=⨁r≥max⁡(0,j−n)LrPj−2r, a class of type (p,q) has primitive components of type (p−r,q−r), and if [ω] is rational these structures are rational (Kähler identities give Lefschetz sl-two and hard Lefschetz).

[F4]

Every de Rham class has a unique harmonic representative, the Hodge decomposition is by type, and Hr(X;Q) is a pure Hodge structure functorial for pullback and with Hodge-type cup product (Compact Kähler Hodge decomposition from elliptic harmonic forms).

[F5]

The top-integral lemma identifies ∫Xα1∧⋯∧αr with the Kronecker evaluation of the cup product of the de Rham classes against the real fundamental class [X] (Top de Rham integration equals fundamental-class evaluation).

[F6]

The general Stokes theorem requires only ACω, which the standing Axiom of Choice supplies by AC implies DC implies countable choice (The general Stokes theorem).

[F7]

For a smooth closed complex submanifold of projective space, the Fubini–Study form restricts to a positive closed real (1,1)-form whose class is the real image of the integral hyperplane class, by the first-Chern comparison (First Chern form agrees with the topological line class); for a smooth projective complex variety, the ample class is realized by a positive closed (1,1)-form on the compact Kähler analytification (Smooth projective analytifications have rational Kähler forms).

[F8]

The de Rham, real and rational comparisons are compatible with pullback and cup product, and rational primitive spaces are rational subspaces of the rational cohomology (Rational cohomology scalar comparison on compact smooth manifolds).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4F6givenalgebra

Let a,b be closed smooth representatives of classes in Pk. Replacing a by a+du changes the integrand by du∧b∧ωn−k, which is d(u∧b∧ωn−k) up to sign because b and ω are closed; the general Stokes theorem [F6] on the compact boundaryless X gives ∫Xd( ⋅ )=0, and the same argument applies in the second variable, so Qk depends only on the classes. Since deg⁡a=deg⁡b=k, one has b∧a=(−1)ka∧b, hence Qk(b,a)=(−1)kQk(a,b). If a has type (p,q) and b type (r,s) with p+q=r+s=k, the top form a∧b∧ωn−k has type (p+r+n−k, q+s+n−k), which can equal (n,n) only if p+r=k=q+s, that is (r,s)=(q,p); so Qk pairs Pp,q only with Pq,p. For nonzero a∈Pp,q let a also denote its harmonic representative, which is primitive of type (p,q) by [F2, F3, F4] and satisfies the displayed positivity: the conjugate form aˉ is primitive of type (q,p), so the pointwise Weil star identity [F2] gives ∗aˉ=ϵ(k)ip−qLn−kaˉ/(n−k)!, whence a∧∗aˉ=ϵ(k)ip−qa∧aˉ∧ωn−k/(n−k)! and, integrating with the L2 pairing of [F1], ip−qQk(a,aˉ)=(n−k)!⟨a,a⟩=(n−k)!∥aharm∥L22>0. Distinct types are L2-orthogonal, so for x=∑p+q=kxp,q the Hermitian form h(x,y)=Qk(Cx,yˉ) of [F1] evaluates as h(x,x)=∑p+q=kip−qQk(xp,q,xˉp,q)=∑p+q=k(n−k)!∥xp,q∥2>0; hence Qk is nondegenerate and satisfies the polarization conditions of [F1], the rationality clause aside.

2.1F1F3F4F5F8step 1.1givenalgebra

Assume now that [ω]=ρ(ℓ) with ℓ∈H2(X;Q). By the rationality clause of [F3] the primitive space Pk=ker⁡Ln−k+1 is a rational subspace of Hk(X;Q) and its complexification is preserved by the Weil operator, and by [F8] the rational and de Rham structures are the natural ones compatible with cup product. For rational classes a,b∈Pk the top-integral lemma [F5] and the compatibility of the de Rham comparison with cup product identify Qk(a,b)=ϵ(k)∫Xa∧b∧ωn−k with ϵ(k)⟨a⌣b⌣ℓn−k,[X]⟩, the Kronecker evaluation of a rational cohomology class against the integral fundamental class, hence a rational number; step 1.1 then exhibits Qk as a rational polarization of the pure Hodge structure Pk in the sense of [F1, F4].

3.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra

For a class of degree k≤n write a=∑rLrar, b=∑sLsbs with ar∈Pk−2r and bs∈Pk−2s by the Lefschetz decomposition of [F3], and set Sk(a,b):=∑r(−1)rQk(Lrar,Lrbr). Since ϵ(k)=ϵ(k−2r+2r)=(−1)rϵ(k−2r), one has (−1)rQk(Lru,Lrv)=Qk−2r(u,v) for u,v∈Pk−2r: both sides are integrals of u∧v∧ωn−k+2r with the respective constants. Hence on the summand LrPk−2r the form Sk is the transport of the polarization Qk−2r via Lr, and distinct summands are orthogonal, because for r<s the integral of Lrar∧Lsbs∧ωn−k equals ∫Xar∧bs∧ωn−k+r+s up to sign and n−k+r+s≥n−(k−2r)+1, so the integral vanishes: on harmonic primitive representatives, Ln−(k−2r)+1ar=0 by [F2], and changing to those representatives does not change the integral by step 1.1. Since L shifts both Hodge indices by 1 and commutes with the Weil operator, which acts by type scalars, the positivity of step 1.1 transfers to every summand, so Sk is nondegenerate, (−1)k-symmetric, type-orthogonal with positive definite Weil form, and rational when ℓ is rational: a rational polarization of the pure Hodge structure Hk. For n<k≤2n hard Lefschetz [F3] gives the rational isomorphism Lk−n:H2n−k→Hk, which shifts both Hodge indices by k−n, and the transported form Sk(a,b):=S2n−k(L−(k−n)a,L−(k−n)b) is again a polarization, of the Tate twist H2n−k(−(k−n)). For k>2n, [F4] computes cohomology by a de Rham complex with no degree-k forms, so Hk=0 and its unique bilinear form is a vacuous polarization. This proves the polarization clauses; replacing the rational class by an arbitrary real Kähler class keeps the positivity and nondegeneracy arguments of steps 1.1 and 2.1 for that metric but drops only rationality.

4.1F7F8step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1givenalgebra

Let Y⊆PM be a smooth closed complex submanifold; the restriction of the Fubini–Study form is a Kähler form on Y, and its class is the real image of the integral hyperplane class c1(O(1)∣Y) by [F7], so the hyperplane class is rational and steps 1.1-3.1 apply to Y. For a smooth projective complex variety X with ample class ℓ, the analytification Xan is compact Kähler and [F7] supplies a positive closed real (1,1)-form η representing ρ(ℓ); η is the fundamental form of a Kähler metric on Xan (its (1,1)-form is positive and closed), and applying steps 1.1-3.1 to (Xan,η) proves the smooth projective clauses. The same argument applies to every real Kähler class, since such a class is by definition represented by a Kähler form, and to ℓ+ϵη whenever that class is represented by a positive closed form; in these last cases no rationality is claimed.

5.1F3step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra∎

Fix 0≤k≤n and a continuous family t↦ℓt of real Kähler classes on the fixed X, and put A(t):=L(t)n−k+1:Hk(X;R)→H2n−k+2(X;R), cup product with ℓtn−k+1. In fixed bases of the finite-dimensional real cohomology spaces the matrix of A(t) depends continuously on t, and its rank is the topological constant dim⁡Hk−2(X;R): the Lefschetz decomposition of [F3] writes Hk=Pk⊕L Hk−2 with Pk=ker⁡A(t), and L:Hk−2→Hk is injective by hard Lefschetz for k−2≤n, the cases k=0,1 having H−2=H−1=0. At any parameter t0 choose a nonvanishing maximal minor of the matrix of A(t0); by continuity it stays invertible for t near t0, and solving the corresponding pivot equations expresses ker⁡A(t)=Pk(t) as the graph of a continuously varying matrix over the complementary coordinate subspace. Hence the primitive kernels of every fixed degree 0≤k≤n vary continuously as subspaces. For each parameter a Kähler representative exists by the definition of Kähler class; positivity at that parameter is that of step 1.1 for this representative and is not inferred by continuity at a limiting non-Kähler class, and rationality of primitive spaces is asserted only at rational classes by step 2.1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

115 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources