Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local leading-eigenvector stability under a spectral gap

Statement

Let p≥2, let A∈Rp×p be symmetric, and order its eigenvalues as λ1(A)≥⋯≥λp(A). Suppose its leading eigenvalue is simple, with gap g:=λ1(A)−λ2(A)>0, and let v be a unit leading eigenvector. Let E∈Rp×p be symmetric, put ϵ:=∥E∥op, and assume 0≤ϵ<g/2. If v~ is any unit leading eigenvector of A+E, then the leading eigenvalue of A+E is simple and ∣λ1(A+E)−λ1(A)∣≤ϵ,sin⁡∠(v,v~):=1−(vTv~)2≤ϵg−ϵ. The bound concerns the line spanned by the eigenvector, so it is unchanged by either sign choice. It is a local eigengap bound; it does not assert a dimension-free Davis--Kahan theorem or a finite-sample inference procedure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real symmetric p×p matrix A, p≥2, a simple leading eigenvalue with gap g>0, a unit leading eigenvector v, a real symmetric perturbation E with operator norm ϵ<g/2, and a unit leading eigenvector v~ of A+E.

[F2]

Courant-Fischer min-max principle for self-adjoint endomorphisms on finite-dimensional real inner product spaces: for a symmetric operator, the ordered eigenvalues are characterized by the minimum-over-subspaces and maximum-over-subspaces Rayleigh-quotient formulas.

[F3]

The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv||: ∥E∥op=max⁡∥x∥2=1∥Ex∥2.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F3F4givenalgebra

For every unit vector x, [F3] and [F4] give ∣xTEx∣≤∥x∥2∥Ex∥2≤ϵ. The top-eigenvalue Rayleigh characterization in [F2] therefore gives λ1(A+E)≤λ1(A)+ϵ, while evaluating the perturbed Rayleigh quotient at v gives λ1(A+E)≥vT(A+E)v≥λ1(A)−ϵ. This proves the eigenvalue bound.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

The minimum--maximum formula in [F2], with the (p−1)-dimensional subspace v⊥, gives λ2(A+E)≤max⁡∥x∥2=1, x⊥vxT(A+E)x≤λ2(A)+ϵ, since every such x has xTAx≤λ2(A). Step 1.1 gives λ1(A+E)≥λ1(A)−ϵ, hence λ1(A+E)−λ2(A+E)≥g−2ϵ>0; the perturbed leading eigenvalue is simple. Also λ1(A+E)−λ2(A)≥g−ϵ>0.

3.1F1F3step 2.1algebra∎

Let P=I−vvT, the orthogonal projection onto v⊥, and write λ~1=λ1(A+E). Projecting (A+E)v~=λ~1v~ onto v⊥ gives (λ~1I−A∣v⊥)Pv~=PEv~. In an orthonormal eigenbasis of A∣v⊥, every eigenvalue of λ~1I−A∣v⊥ is at least λ~1−λ2(A)≥g−ϵ by step 2.1. Therefore (g−ϵ)∥Pv~∥2≤∥PEv~∥2≤ϵ. Indeed, z=Pz+(I−P)z is an orthogonal decomposition, so ∥Pz∥2≤∥z∥2; then [F3] and ∥v~∥2=1 give the final inequality. Since ∥Pv~∥22=1−(vTv~)2, division by g−ϵ>0 proves the angle bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources