Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A metabolizer forces Levine–Tristram signatures to vanish

Statement

Assume full AC. Let K⊂S3 be a smooth oriented knot, let F be a connected compact smooth oriented Seifert surface of genus g, and let V be the positive-push Seifert matrix in an ordered integral basis. Suppose the integral Seifert lattice has a rank-g direct summand M on which V vanishes identically. For every ω∈S1∖{1} with ΔK(ω)≠0, the Levine–Tristram signature σω(K) is zero. The assertion concerns only points away from Alexander roots; no value at a root is asserted here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a knot Seifert matrix V of size 2g, a rank-g direct-summand metabolizer M, and ω∈S1∖{1} with ΔK(ω)≠0.

[A1]

Full AC is the choice axiom stated by the knot Seifert-pairing convention; the finite-dimensional Hermitian argument below is choice-free. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

In an ordered integral basis, Vij=lk⁡(ai+,aj). Seifert pairing and matrix of an oriented knot

[F2]

A metabolizer is a rank-g direct summand M with V(x,y)=0 for every x,y∈M. Metabolic Seifert forms and algebraic knot concordance

[F3]

The determinant dV(t)=det⁡(V−tVT) differs from ΔK(t) by a Laurent unit. The Seifert determinant is the knot Alexander polynomial

[F4]

The matrix Hω(V)=(1−ω)V+(1−ωˉ)VT is Hermitian, and its signature is the value σω(K). Levine–Tristram Hermitian form and signature

[F5]

The nonroot Levine–Tristram signature is independent of the chosen surface and basis. Seifert stabilization preserves the Levine–Tristram signature

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F4givenchooseconstruct

If g=0, the Hermitian matrix is empty and has signature 0 by [F4]. Suppose g>0. Choose an integral basis of M and extend it by a basis of a complementary summand of H1(F;Z). In this basis, V=(0BCD) and Hω(V)=(0AA∗E), where A=(1−ω)B+(1−ωˉ)CT, E=E∗, and the upper-left block is zero because V vanishes on M×M.

2.1F3step 1.1givenalgebra

Write d(t)=det⁡(V−tVT). Transposition and factoring −t from the 2g rows give d(t)=t2gd(t−1). By [F3], d(ω)≠0 since ΔK(ω)≠0 and the Laurent unit is nonzero at ω; the reciprocal identity gives d(ω−1)≠0. Since Hω(V)=(1−ω)(V−ω−1VT) and ω≠1, the Hermitian matrix is nonsingular.

3.1step 2.1algebra

If A∗x=0, then Hω(V)(x,0)=0. Nonsingularity from step 2.1 forces x=0; because A∗ is a square g×g matrix, it is invertible.

4.1F4F5step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

For the Hermitian form with matrix in step 1.1, make the invertible coordinate change x=x′−12(A∗)−1Ey. This cancels the lower-right term y∗Ey and leaves x′∗Ay+y∗A∗x′. The further change z=Ay reduces it to the form with matrix (0IgIg0). Its g-dimensional subspaces (u,u) and (u,−u) have eigenvalues +1 and −1, respectively, so its signature is zero. Invertible congruence preserves positive and negative indices, and [F4] identifies this matrix signature with the signature of the chosen matrix; [F5] identifies it with σω(K).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources