Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Seifert stabilization preserves the Levine–Tristram signature

Statement

Assume full AC. For every ω∈S1∖{1}, changing an ordered basis by an integral unimodular congruence or changing a knot Seifert matrix by either elementary enlargement or reduction preserves the signature of Hω. Consequently, the nonroot Levine–Tristram signature and its one-sided-average value at every Alexander root are independent of the spanning surface and basis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, an oriented knot Seifert matrix V, its two enlargement matrices, and ω∈S1∖{1}.

[A1]

Full AC is the choice-function axiom assumed by the knot-surface and Seifert-pairing suppliers. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

A basis change is V↦PTVP for P∈GL2g(Z); knot surfaces are related by isotopies and the two enlargements. Seifert pairing and matrix of an oriented knot, Seifert matrices of a knot are S-equivalent, S-equivalence of integral Seifert matrices

[F2]

Signature is the positive eigenvalue count minus negative eigenvalue count of a finite Hermitian matrix. Levine–Tristram Hermitian form and signature

[F3]

The one-sided signature limits at every Alexander root exist, so their arithmetic averages are defined. One-sided Levine–Tristram signature limits exist

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

Since P is real, Hω(PTVP)=PTHω(V)P. An invertible congruence is a change of coordinates in the associated Hermitian form, so its positive and negative indices are unchanged: a maximal positive subspace maps bijectively by P, and likewise for negative subspaces. Hence the signature is invariant under basis change.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Put c=1−ω≠0. For either enlargement, the enlarged Hermitian matrix has block form H~=(Hb0b∗z(c+cˉ)λ0λˉ0),∣λ∣=∣c∣>0, where H=Hω(V), b is the column determined by the enlargement vectors, and z∈Z. The lower 2×2 block D has determinant −∣c∣2<0, hence one positive and one negative eigenvalue. Its inverse has (D−1)11=0. The block congruence eliminating b therefore has Schur complement H−b(D−1)11b∗=H, so H~ is congruent to H⊕D. The block D contributes signature 0, proving enlargement invariance for every ω≠1, including singular parameters.

3.1A1F1F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

By [F1], any two knot matrices are connected by the operations of steps 1.1 and 2.1, so their signatures agree at every nonroot parameter. The one-sided signatures are equal as functions on each punctured neighboring arc; by [F3] their arithmetic averages are defined and agree at a root as well. Reductions reverse the same equalities.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Levine–Tristram Hermitian form and signature.

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources