How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Seifert stabilization preserves the Levine–Tristram signature
Statement
Assume full AC. For every , changing an ordered basis by an integral unimodular congruence or changing a knot Seifert matrix by either elementary enlargement or reduction preserves the signature of . Consequently, the nonroot Levine–Tristram signature and its one-sided-average value at every Alexander root are independent of the spanning surface and basis.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Full AC, an oriented knot Seifert matrix , its two enlargement matrices, and .
Full AC is the choice-function axiom assumed by the knot-surface and Seifert-pairing suppliers. The Axiom of Choice
A basis change is for ; knot surfaces are related by isotopies and the two enlargements. Seifert pairing and matrix of an oriented knot, Seifert matrices of a knot are S-equivalent, S-equivalence of integral Seifert matrices
Signature is the positive eigenvalue count minus negative eigenvalue count of a finite Hermitian matrix. Levine–Tristram Hermitian form and signature
The one-sided signature limits at every Alexander root exist, so their arithmetic averages are defined. One-sided Levine–Tristram signature limits exist
Proof
Since is real, . An invertible congruence is a change of coordinates in the associated Hermitian form, so its positive and negative indices are unchanged: a maximal positive subspace maps bijectively by , and likewise for negative subspaces. Hence the signature is invariant under basis change.
Put . For either enlargement, the enlarged Hermitian matrix has block form where , is the column determined by the enlargement vectors, and . The lower block has determinant , hence one positive and one negative eigenvalue. Its inverse has . The block congruence eliminating therefore has Schur complement , so is congruent to . The block contributes signature , proving enlargement invariance for every , including singular parameters.
By [F1], any two knot matrices are connected by the operations of steps 1.1 and 2.1, so their signatures agree at every nonroot parameter. The one-sided signatures are equal as functions on each punctured neighboring arc; by [F3] their arithmetic averages are defined and agree at a root as well. Reductions reverse the same equalities.
Depends on
Used by
- Trefoil and figure-eight Levine–Tristram and Arf calculations Example
- A metabolizer forces Levine–Tristram signatures to vanish Theorem
- The classical signature bounds unknotting number Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Levine–Tristram Hermitian form and signature.
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. B. Raymond Lickorish, An Introduction to Knot Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 175, Springer (1997) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Anthony Conway, The Levine–Tristram signature: a survey, 2019–20 MATRIX Annals (2021), pp. 31–56 (arXiv:1903.04477) (standard reference, not scraped)