Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Mittag-Leffler expansion of pi cotangent

Statement

For every zCZ,

πcot(πz)=1z+n12zz2n2=1z+n1(1zn+1z+n).

where the series converges locally uniformly on CZ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The integer pole set and the cotangent function.

[L1]

The complex sine and cosine are defined by the complex exponential, so their standard x+iy formulas are available by direct algebra (Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine from the complex exponential).

[L2]

The zeros of sin(πz) are exactly the integers, and sin(πz)=πcos(πz), so πcot(πz) is meromorphic with simple residue-1 poles at the integers (Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains, Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine are entire with their standard derivatives, The zeros of complex sine are the integer multiples of pi, and the zeros of complex cosine are the odd half-integer multiples of pi).

[L3]

The residue theorem evaluates contour integrals by enclosed residues. (The residue theorem for a null-homologous cycle)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix zCZ. For N large enough that z,zRN, let RN be the positively oriented rectangle with [L2, L3, given, algebra] vertices ±(N+1/2)±i(N+1/2) and set FN(w):=πcot(πw)w2z2. By [L2], the poles of FN inside RN are the integers n with nN and the points w=±z. The residue at an integer n is (n2z2)1, while the residues at w=z and w=z sum to πcot(πz)2z+πcot(πz)2z=πcot(πz)z. Therefore [L3] gives RNFN(w)dw=2πi(πcot(πz)z+n=NN1n2z2).

L2L3givenalgebra
2.1

On the vertical sides of RN, write w=±(N+1/2)+iy. [L1, step 1.1, algebra] sin(πw)=±cosh(πy) and cos(πw)=isinh(πy) by [L1], so cot(πw)=tanh(πy)1. On the horizontal sides, w=x±i(N+1/2), and [L1] gives sin(πw)2=sin2(πx)+sinh2(π(N+1/2)),cos(πw)2=cos2(πx)+sinh2(π(N+1/2)), so cot(πw)2. Also wN+1/2 on RN, hence w2z2w2z2(N+1/2)2z2. Thus FN(w)Cz/N2 on RN, and since the boundary length is 8N+4, one gets RNFN(w)dw0 as N.

L1step 1.1algebra
3.1

Letting N in step 1.1 and using step 2.1 yields [step 1.1, step 2.1, algebra] πcot(πz)z=nZ1n2z2=1z2+n12z2n2. Multiplying by z gives πcot(πz)=1z+n12zz2n2=1z+n1(1zn+1z+n). On every compact subset of CZ, the last series is bounded termwise by CK/n2 for all large n, so it converges locally uniformly there. This is exactly the claimed expansion.

step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources