How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Mittag-Leffler expansion of pi cotangent
Statement
For every ,
where the series converges locally uniformly on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The integer pole set and the cotangent function.
The complex sine and cosine are defined by the complex exponential, so their standard formulas are available by direct algebra (Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine from the complex exponential).
The zeros of are exactly the integers, and , so is meromorphic with simple residue- poles at the integers (Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains, Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine are entire with their standard derivatives, The zeros of complex sine are the integer multiples of pi, and the zeros of complex cosine are the odd half-integer multiples of pi).
The residue theorem evaluates contour integrals by enclosed residues. (The residue theorem for a null-homologous cycle)
Proof
Fix . For large enough that , let be the positively oriented rectangle with [L2, L3, given, algebra] vertices and set By [L2], the poles of inside are the integers with and the points . The residue at an integer is , while the residues at and sum to Therefore [L3] gives
On the vertical sides of , write . [L1, step 1.1, algebra] and by [L1], so . On the horizontal sides, , and [L1] gives so . Also on , hence . Thus on , and since the boundary length is , one gets as .
Letting in step 1.1 and using step 2.1 yields [step 1.1, step 2.1, algebra] Multiplying by gives On every compact subset of , the last series is bounded termwise by for all large , so it converges locally uniformly there. This is exactly the claimed expansion.
Depends on
- Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine from the complex exponential
- Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains
- Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine are entire with their standard derivatives
- The zeros of complex sine are the integer multiples of pi, and the zeros of complex cosine are the odd half-integer multiples of pi
- The residue theorem for a null-homologous cycle
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Weber, Complex Analysis, Example 3.3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, §9.4 (standard reference, not scraped)