How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Positive-probability instrument branches are density operators
Statement
Let be an input density operator for a finite instrument , and let . If , then the conditional operator is a density operator on the instrument's output space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite instrument, an input density operator , and an outcome with .
Finite instruments and conditional states: each branch map is completely positive, , and the conditional operator is when .
Completely positive maps: at ancilla dimension , a completely positive map preserves nonnegative operators.
Density operator: on a nonzero finite-dimensional complex inner-product space, a density operator is nonnegative and has trace one.
Instrument outcome weights normalize: the branch weights satisfy and sum to one.
Trace is a linear functional on : trace commutes with scalar multiplication.
Non-negative and positive operators: a nonnegative operator is self-adjoint and has nonnegative quadratic form on every vector.
Proof
The outcome-law theorem [F3] shows that is the probability of branch ; the hypothesis selects a positive-probability branch.
Put . By [F1]–[F2] and [F5]–[F6], is nonnegative. Since is real and is self-adjoint, for all one has , so is self-adjoint. Division by also preserves nonnegativity of every quadratic form. Thus is nonnegative by [F6].
By the definition in [F1], . Linearity [F4] gives . Thus is a density operator by [F5]. The hypothesis also forces the output space to be nonzero, since its zero space has only trace-zero endomorphisms.
Depends on
Used by
- One Simon Fourier-sampling sample Algorithm
- Finite authenticated key-distribution protocol Definition
- Heralded success and conditional verification contract Definition
- Normalized output law for finite quantum query branches Definition
- Simon query and output measurement produce a coset pair Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Finite instruments and conditional states.
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information (2018), §2.3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Preskill, Quantum Computation, Chapter 3: Foundations II: Measurement and Evolution, §3.2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)