Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gross logarithmic Sobolev inequality for standard Gaussian measure

Statement

Assume AC, DC, and countable choice, and let γd be standard Gaussian measure on Rd. For every g∈C2(Rd) bounded above and below by positive constants, with bounded first and second derivatives, Ent⁡γd(g):=∫glog⁡g dγd−(∫g dγd)log⁡(∫g dγd)≤12∫∣∇g∣2g dγd.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The standard d-dimensional Gaussian γd=Nd(0,Id) has Lebesgue density (2π)−d/2e−∣x∣2/2 (A positive-definite multivariate normal law has its Gaussian density), and independent standard Gaussian vectors have joint standard Gaussian law (Standard normal and normal laws, A finite stack of independent Gaussian vectors is jointly Gaussian).

[A1]

AC, DC, and countable choice are assumed in the Statement: AC meets the Gaussian suppliers' hypotheses, and DC and countable choice meet the integration-by-parts and fundamental-theorem-of-calculus hypotheses (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F2]

Differentiation under an integral is justified by a common integrable majorant (Differentiation under the integral sign).

[F3]

Under DC and countable choice, one-dimensional integration by parts holds for absolutely continuous functions on compact intervals (Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions).

[F4]

Dominated convergence and Fubini apply to the bounded semigroup integrands (Dominated convergence, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F5]

Monotone convergence passes the nonnegative entropy dissipation integrals to their endpoint limits (Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F6]

The fundamental theorem of calculus applies to the continuously differentiable entropy function on every compact time interval (Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions).

[F7]

Cauchy–Schwarz holds for square-integrable functions on γd (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

Proof

Given: AC, DC, countable choice, d≥1, standard Gaussian measure γd, and g satisfying the hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4givenalgebra

For t>0, put a=e−t, b=1−e−2t, and Ptg(x)=∫g(ax+by) dγd(y). By [F1], aX+bY is standard Gaussian for independent X,Y∼γd; Fubini [F4] gives ∫Ptg dγd=∫g dγd. Differentiation under the integral [F2] gives ∇Ptg=aPt(∇g) and ΔPtg=a2Pt(Δg). It also gives ∂tPtg=−ax⋅Pt(∇g)+(a2/b)∫y⋅∇g(ax+by) dγd(y). For each coordinate, [F3] applied against the Gaussian density gives ∫yi∂ig(ax+by) dγd=b∫∂iig(ax+by) dγd; the boundary terms vanish because ∂ig is bounded and the Gaussian density tends to zero at both ends. Thus ∂tPtg=ΔPtg−x⋅∇Ptg.

2.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1algebra

Put ut=Ptg. Differentiate the entropy using step 1.1 and [F2]: ddtEnt⁡γd(ut)=∫(1+log⁡ut)(Δut−x⋅∇ut) dγd. For each coordinate, [F3] applied to v=1+log⁡ut and ∂iut against the Gaussian density [F1] gives ∫v(∂iiut−xi∂iut)dγd=−∫(∂iut)2/ut dγd; the boundary term vanishes because v and ∇ut are bounded and the density tends to zero. Summing coordinates yields ddtEnt⁡γd(ut)=−∫∣∇ut∣2ut dγd. The differentiated integrands are dominated on each compact time interval because ut stays between the positive bounds for g and its first two derivatives are bounded. As t↓0, continuity of g and bounded convergence [F4] give Ptg(x)→g(x) and Ent⁡γd(ut)→Ent⁡γd(g). As t→∞, ut(x)→∫g dγd, so [F4] gives entropy limit zero. Integrate the derivative on [δ,T] by [F6], then let δ↓0 and T↑∞ using [F5] on the nonnegative dissipation. Therefore Ent⁡γd(g)=∫0∞∫∣∇Ptg∣2/(Ptg) dγd dt.

2.2F7step 1.1algebra

For each x,t, apply [F7] to each coordinate after writing ∇g=(∇g/g)g inside the probability integral defining Pt. Summing the coordinate inequalities gives ∣Pt(∇g)(x)∣2Ptg(x)≤Pt ⁣(∣∇g∣2g)(x).

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

By step 1.1, ∣∇Ptg∣2=e−2t∣Pt(∇g)∣2; apply step 2.2, integrate using invariance of γd, and use ∫0∞e−2t dt=1/2 in the entropy representation of step 2.1. This gives Ent⁡γd(g)≤12∫∣∇g∣2g dγd.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources