Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The continuous survival and cumulative-hazard identity

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Let T be a nonnegative event time with a finite-valued density f relative to Lebesgue measure, so PT(A)=∫Af(u) du for every Borel A⊆[0,∞), and assume ST(0)=1. Let τ∗:=inf⁡{t≥0:ST(t)=0}, with τ∗=+∞ if this set is empty. For every 0≤t<τ∗, ST(t)=exp⁡ ⁣(−∫0tf(u)ST(u) du). If τ∗<∞, the improper cumulative hazard tends to +∞ as t↑τ∗; extending it by +∞ for t≥τ∗ gives the same identity there with the convention e−∞=0. The density-hazard formula is asserted only where ST>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, Dependent Choice, a nonnegative finite-valued density f, and its event-time law PT=f du.

[F1]

The density law is the measure f du; ST(t)=PT(T>t), ST(0)=1, and ST is nonincreasing because {T>t} decreases with t. The measure with density f relative to μ, Lebesgue measurable sets, the family L(Rn), and the restricted set function λn, Parametric survival and reliability models, Measures are monotone

[F2]

For f∈L1[0,t], If(x)=∫0xf(u) du is differentiable a.e. with derivative f. The indefinite integral of an L1 function is differentiable almost everywhere

[F3]

The indefinite integral of an L1 function is absolutely continuous. The indefinite integral of an L1 function is absolutely continuous

[F4]

On (0,∞), log⁡′(x)=1/x and log⁡b−log⁡a=∫abdu/u. Thus log⁡ is increasing by the mean value theorem; since it is unbounded below, log⁡x→−∞ as x↓0. The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t, The integral logarithm is unbounded above and below, The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)

[F6]

If G is absolutely continuous on a compact interval, then G(t)−G(0)=∫0tG′(u) du. Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions

[F8]

Under Countable Choice, every singleton has Lebesgue measure zero, and a nonnegative measurable density integrates to zero over that null set. A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included, A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes

[F10]

The pointwise product of measurable real-valued functions is measurable. Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined

[F11]

For every x>0, exp⁡(log⁡x)=x; also log⁡1=0, since exp⁡(0)=1 by its power-series definition and log⁡(exp⁡y)=y. The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, The real exponential function and the number e by a power series

[A1]

Countable Choice is used by [F2] to obtain the a.e. derivative of the indefinite density integral, by [F8] for the singleton null-set formula, and to select the approximating zero times in step 4.1. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[A2]

Dependent Choice, together with Countable Choice, is used by [F6] to integrate the a.e. derivative of an absolutely continuous function. The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1F1F3F8given

Since T≥0 and ST(0)=1, PT(T=0)=0. The density law gives PT(T≤x)=∫[0,x]f(u) du; [F8] makes both endpoint integrals zero, so this equals ∫0xf(u) du. Therefore ST(x)=1−∫0xf(u) du for every x≥0. This integral is at most 1, so f∈L1[0,x] for each x>0; [F3] then makes ST absolutely continuous on each compact interval.

1.2givenF1F3F9F10algebra

The identity is immediate at t=0, so fix 0<t<τ∗. The survival function is nonincreasing and positive on [0,t], so ST(u)≥ST(t)>0 there. For every a∈R, the set {u∈[0,t]:ST(u)>a} is downward closed in [0,t], hence is empty, all of [0,t], or an interval with one endpoint at 0; each is Lebesgue measurable by [F9]. Since the upper rays generate the Borel sigma-algebra, ST is Lebesgue measurable on [0,t]. The reciprocal map is continuous on [ST(t),1], so its inverse images of Borel sets are Borel; the preimage identity then makes 1/ST measurable. [F10] gives measurability of the product f/ST. Consequently ∫0tf(u)ST(u) du≤1ST(t)∫0tf(u) du<∞. Thus ΛT(x):=∫0xf(u)/ST(u) du is absolutely continuous on [0,t] by [F3].

2.1A1F2F3F4F5step 1.1

By [F2] and step 1.1, ST′=−f almost everywhere on [0,t]. For x,y∈[ST(t),1], [F4] gives ∣log⁡x−log⁡y∣≤∣x−y∣ST(t). This Lipschitz bound and absolute continuity of ST show directly from the finite disjoint-interval definition that log⁡∘ST is absolutely continuous. Applying [F2] to the integrable function f/ST gives ΛT′=f/ST almost everywhere. At almost every point where ST′ exists, [F5] yields (log⁡ST)′=ST′/ST=−f/ST=−ΛT′.

3.1A1A2F6F11step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Applying [F6] to log⁡∘ST on [0,t] gives log⁡ST(t)−log⁡ST(0)=−∫0tf(u)ST(u) du. Since ST(0)=1 and [F11] gives log⁡1=0, exponentiating and using [F11] yields the identity for 0<t<τ∗; the case t=0 was handled in step 1.2.

4.1A1F1F4F7givenstep 1.1step 3.1algebra

If τ∗<∞, continuity from [F7] makes the zero set Z:={t≥0:ST(t)=0} closed. Since Z is nonempty and bounded below, τ∗:=inf⁡Z belongs to Z: for every n∈N choose zn∈Z with τ∗≤zn<τ∗+1/(n+1), so zn→τ∗ and continuity gives ST(τ∗)=0. Nonincreasing survival [F1] then gives ST(t)=0 for t≥τ∗. Step 3.1 gives ΛT(t)=−log⁡ST(t) for t<τ∗. Since ST(t)→0 by continuity at τ∗ and [F4], this tends to +∞ as t↑τ∗. The stated extended convention therefore gives ST(t)=e−ΛT(t) also for t≥τ∗.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

The identity holds throughout the positive-survival interval and at a finite terminal endpoint under the stated extended convention.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

100 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources