How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exponential and Weibull survival specifications define probability laws
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. For , the density defines a probability law on with survival for . For , the density defines a probability law with survival for . Each law is unique among probability laws on with that survival. The density hazards are respectively and for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Positive parameters , , and Lebesgue measure on .
A nonnegative measurable function defines the measure . The measure with density relative to
For , is differentiable with derivative ; and the chain rule holds. Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers, The exponential function is smooth and , The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , The exponential function is strictly increasing, The exponential is positive and satisfies
A positive derivative implies increase by the mean value theorem. The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with
The positive-base power satisfies , and is increasing and unbounded in both directions. Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention, The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t, The integral logarithm is unbounded above and below
as and as . The exponential tends to at and to at
If on a compact interval and is Riemann integrable, then . The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then
Continuous functions on a compact interval are Riemann integrable, and a bounded Riemann integrable function has the same Riemann and Lebesgue integrals under Countable Choice. A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral
Increasing limits of nonnegative measurable functions pass through their Lebesgue integrals. Monotone convergence for the integral
Under Countable Choice, a CDF determines a unique probability law. Cumulative distribution function of a real random variable, Probability laws correspond to distribution functions
On the real line, Lebesgue measure is the restriction of Lebesgue outer measure to the Lebesgue-measurable sets, and under Countable Choice it is a measure on that sigma-algebra. Lebesgue measurable sets, the family , and the restricted set function , Assuming countable choice, is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and is a complete measure extending elementary volume
Open sets generate the Borel sigma-algebra, whose members are the Borel sets. The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space
Under Countable Choice, every Borel subset of the real line is Lebesgue measurable. Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of is Lebesgue measurable
Countable Choice is used in [F7] to identify Riemann and Lebesgue integrals, in [F9] to construct and identify the probability law, and in [F10] and [F12] for the measure and Borel-measurability properties of Lebesgue measure. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Proof
Define for and for ; define for and for . Both are continuous at by [F2], [F4], and [F5]. On their derivatives are the displayed densities and are positive by [F2]. The piecewise densities are Borel measurable: on they are products of continuous functions, and on they vanish; both domains are Borel by [F11]. The mean value theorem in [F3] makes each increasing on . For , both and are positive, so strict increase of the exponential gives ; hence both candidate CDFs are positive there; thus their value at is consistent with monotonicity. Their limits are at and at , so each is a CDF on .
Fix . Each CDF is differentiable on with the continuous derivative from the Statement. By [F6] its Riemann integral is ; by [F7] this equals its Lebesgue integral with respect to the measure in [F10]. Letting for integers large enough that , [F8] and continuity at give This applies separately to the exponential and Weibull formulas.
For either displayed nonnegative density , [F1] defines the measure on Lebesgue-measurable sets. By [F12], its restriction to Borel sets is a measure. Step 2.1 gives for every . Since on , this part has -measure zero, so ; for both sides are . Also by [F8] and step 1.1. Thus is a probability law with CDF , and [F9] identifies it with the unique law specified by the survival formula. Consequently is the stated density.
Dividing the exponential density by its positive survival gives hazard . Dividing the Weibull density by its positive survival gives for .
Steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, and 4.1 establish CDF validity, density-law existence, survival formulas, uniqueness, and the density hazards for both parameter families.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Cumulative distribution function of a real random variable
- Lebesgue measurable sets, the family $\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^n)$, and the restricted set function $\lambda_n$
- Assuming countable choice, $\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and $\lambda_n$ is a complete measure extending elementary volume
- Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is Lebesgue measurable
- The measure with density $f$ relative to $\mu$
- Parametric survival and reliability models
- The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space
- Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention
- Probability laws correspond to distribution functions
- Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers
- The exponential function is smooth and $(\exp)'=\exp$
- The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if $g$ is differentiable at $c$ and $f$ is differentiable at $g(c)$, then $f \circ g$ is differentiable at $c$ with $(f \circ g)'(c) = f'(g(c))\,g'(c)$
- The exponential function is strictly increasing
- The exponential is positive and satisfies $\exp(-x)=1/\exp(x)$
- The mean value theorem, as the case $g(x) = x$ of Cauchy's: for $f$ continuous on $[a,b]$ with $a < b$ and differentiable on $(a,b)$ there is $c \in (a,b)$ with $f(b) - f(a) = f'(c)(b-a)$
- The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t
- The integral logarithm is unbounded above and below
- The exponential tends to $+\infty$ at $+\infty$ and to $0$ at $-\infty$
- The second fundamental theorem: if $G$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ with $G' = f$ and $f$ is integrable, then $\int_a^b f = G(b)-G(a)$
- A continuous function on $[a,b]$ is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
- A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral
- Monotone convergence for the integral
Used by
- Dominating thinning for bounded time-varying propensities Algorithm
- Gillespie direct method with horizon and budget statuses Algorithm
- Minimum-intensity coupling of reaction networks Algorithm
- Next-reaction method by internal Poisson clocks Algorithm
- Quadratic pure-birth rates can explode Counterexample
- Exponential and Weibull hazards with right-censored exposure Example
- No observed failures with positive versus zero exposure Example
- Competing exponential clocks give the reaction event law Lemma
- A proper Lyapunov bound prevents reaction-network explosion Theorem
- Compensators, brackets, and jump-integral isometry for reaction counts Theorem
- Dominating thinning has the prescribed reaction law Theorem
- Finite-state Gillespie and next-reaction methods have the specified CTMC law Theorem
- Right-censored exponential likelihood and its boundary maximum Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Parametric survival and reliability models.
Dependency tree · two levels
123 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- NIST/SEMATECH Engineering Statistics Handbook, Chapter 8, §§8.1.2.1, 8.1.6.1–8.1.6.2, PDF pp. 12–19 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lu Tian, STAT331 Unit 2: Likelihood Construction, Inference for Parametric Survival Distributions, §2.2, PDF pp. 5–7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Qiqing Yu, Survival Analysis (Lecture Notes), §2.2.1–2.2.2, PDF pp. 10–11 (standard reference, not scraped)