Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exponential and Weibull survival specifications define probability laws

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. For λ>0, the density fλ(t)={λe−λt,t>0,0,t≤0 defines a probability law on R with survival S(t)=e−λt for t≥0. For k,η>0, the density fk,η(t)={kη(t/η)k−1e−(t/η)k,t>0,0,t≤0 defines a probability law with survival S(t)=e−(t/η)k for t≥0. Each law is unique among probability laws on [0,∞) with that survival. The density hazards are respectively λ and kη(t/η)k−1 for t>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive parameters λ, k, η and Lebesgue measure dt on R.

[F1]

A nonnegative measurable function f defines the measure A↦∫Af(t) dt. The measure with density f relative to μ

[F5]

ex→+∞ as x→+∞ and ex→0 as x→−∞. The exponential tends to +∞ at +∞ and to 0 at −∞

[F6]

If G′=f on a compact interval and f is Riemann integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a). The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)

[F7]

Continuous functions on a compact interval are Riemann integrable, and a bounded Riemann integrable function has the same Riemann and Lebesgue integrals under Countable Choice. A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral

[F8]

Increasing limits of nonnegative measurable functions pass through their Lebesgue integrals. Monotone convergence for the integral

[F10]

On the real line, Lebesgue measure is the restriction of Lebesgue outer measure to the Lebesgue-measurable sets, and under Countable Choice it is a measure on that sigma-algebra. Lebesgue measurable sets, the family L(Rn), and the restricted set function λn, Assuming countable choice, L(Rn) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λn is a complete measure extending elementary volume

[F11]

Open sets generate the Borel sigma-algebra, whose members are the Borel sets. The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space

[F12]

Under Countable Choice, every Borel subset of the real line is Lebesgue measurable. Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable

[A1]

Countable Choice is used in [F7] to identify Riemann and Lebesgue integrals, in [F9] to construct and identify the probability law, and in [F10] and [F12] for the measure and Borel-measurability properties of Lebesgue measure. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F3F4F5F11given

Define Fλ(t)=0 for t<0 and Fλ(t)=1−e−λt for t≥0; define Fk,η(t)=0 for t<0 and Fk,η(t)=1−e−(t/η)k for t≥0. Both are continuous at 0 by [F2], [F4], and [F5]. On t>0 their derivatives are the displayed densities and are positive by [F2]. The piecewise densities are Borel measurable: on (0,∞) they are products of continuous functions, and on (−∞,0] they vanish; both domains are Borel by [F11]. The mean value theorem in [F3] makes each increasing on (0,∞). For t>0, both a=λt and a=(t/η)k are positive, so strict increase of the exponential gives e−a<e0=1; hence both candidate CDFs are positive there; thus their value 0 at 0 is consistent with monotonicity. Their limits are 0 at −∞ and 1 at +∞, so each is a CDF on R.

2.1A1F6F7F8F10step 1.1

Fix 0<a<b. Each CDF is differentiable on [a,b] with the continuous derivative f from the Statement. By [F6] its Riemann integral is F(b)−F(a); by [F7] this equals its Lebesgue integral with respect to the measure in [F10]. Letting a=1/n↓0 for integers n large enough that 1/n<b, [F8] and continuity at 0 give ∫(0,b]f(u) du=F(b). This applies separately to the exponential and Weibull formulas.

3.1A1F1F8F9F10F12step 1.1step 2.1

For either displayed nonnegative density f, [F1] defines the measure νf=f dt on Lebesgue-measurable sets. By [F12], its restriction to Borel sets is a measure. Step 2.1 gives νf((0,t])=F(t) for every t>0. Since f=0 on (−∞,0], this part has νf-measure zero, so νf((−∞,t])=F(t); for t≤0 both sides are 0. Also νf(R)=lim⁡n→∞νf((−∞,n])=lim⁡n→∞F(n)=1 by [F8] and step 1.1. Thus νf is a probability law with CDF F, and [F9] identifies it with the unique law specified by the survival formula. Consequently f is the stated density.

4.1givenstep 3.1algebra

Dividing the exponential density by its positive survival gives hazard λ. Dividing the Weibull density by its positive survival gives kη(t/η)k−1 for t>0.

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, and 4.1 establish CDF validity, density-law existence, survival formulas, uniqueness, and the density hazards for both parameter families.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Parametric survival and reliability models.

Dependency tree · two levels

123 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources