Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Transverse preimages for maps from manifolds with boundary

Statement

Let W be a smooth manifold with boundary, N a smooth manifold without boundary, Z⊆N a closed embedded submanifold, and F:W→N a smooth map. Suppose that at every p∈F−1(Z) the differential is transverse to Z, dFp(TpW)+TF(p)Z=TF(p)N, and that the restriction F∣∂W is transverse to Z. Then F−1(Z) is an embedded smooth submanifold with boundary of W of dimension dim⁡W−codim⁡Z, with

TpF−1(Z)={v∈TpW:dFp(v)∈TF(p)Z}

and F−1(Z)∩∂W=(F∣∂W)−1(Z). If dim⁡W−codim⁡Z≥1, then F−1(Z) is neat and

∂(F−1(Z))=F−1(Z)∩∂W=(F∣∂W)−1(Z).

If dim⁡W=codim⁡Z, transversality of the boundary restriction forces F−1(Z)∩∂W=∅: a space of dimension dim⁡W−1 cannot surject onto the codim⁡Z normal directions. Thus the zero-dimensional preimage also has the asserted empty boundary. If dim⁡W<codim⁡Z, the preimage is empty by the same rank bound. These include the empty-preimage cases.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth map F:W→N from a manifold with boundary to a boundaryless manifold, a closed embedded submanifold Z⊆N of codimension c, and transversality of F and of F∣∂W to Z.

[F1]

A slice chart for Z at z∈Z is a chart y:V→y(V)⊆Rn′ with y(Z∩V)=y(V)∩(Rn′−c×{0}); the last c coordinates of y then define a submersion on V with zero set Z∩V (Embedded submanifolds and slice charts).

[F2]

Transversality of F to Z means dFp(TpW)+TF(p)Z=TF(p)N at every p∈F−1(Z), and F∣∂W is transverse to Z when the same condition holds for the restricted differential on Tp∂W at every p∈F−1(Z)∩∂W (A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold).

[F3]

Boundary charts of W are homeomorphisms φ:U→φ(U)⊆Hn with φ(U∩∂W)=φ(U)∩{xn=0} (Smooth charts, atlases, and structures with boundary).

[F4]

If G:Mm→Nn′ is smooth on a boundaryless manifold and transverse to Z, then G−1(Z) is an embedded submanifold of codimension c with TpG−1(Z)={v∈TpM:dGp(v)∈TG(p)Z} (The transverse preimage theorem).

[F5]

An embedded submanifold with boundary S⊆W is neat when S∩∂W=∂S and S is transverse to ∂W; a neat submanifold has boundary charts simultaneously straightening S and ∂W (Neat submanifolds of a manifold with boundary, Neat submanifolds have boundary-adapted slice charts).

[F6]

A smooth function on a relatively open subset of Hn extends locally to a smooth function on an open subset of Rn, and the chain rule holds for smooth maps between manifolds with boundary (Smooth functions on relatively open half-space sets, Smooth maps between manifolds with boundary). The Euclidean inverse function theorem applies to an invertible local extension (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

Proof

technique · reduce to a submersion identity in a half-space chart, then apply the inverse function theorem in the two cases
1.1F1F2F3F6givenalgebra

Fix p∈F−1(Z) and put z:=F(p); write n:=dim⁡W and n′:=dim⁡N. At a boundary point choose a boundary chart x:U→x(U)⊆Hn with x(p)=0; at an interior point use an ordinary Euclidean chart centred at p and a slice chart y:V→y(V) of Z at z with y(z)=0, and let g be the last c coordinates of y on V. Then G:=g∘F is defined near p on a relatively open half-space set, and for q near p one has G(q)=0 exactly when F(q)∈Z. At such a q the differential dGq=dgF(q)∘dFq is surjective: dgF(q) is surjective with kernel TF(q)Z, so its image of dFq(TqW) is (dFq(TqW)+TF(q)Z)/TF(q)Z=TF(q)N/TF(q)Z, which is all of Rc by [F2]. At boundary points, on the face {xn=0} the same computation with Tq∂W in place of TqW is surjective by the transversality of F∣∂W.

2.1F1F4step 1.1

(Interior points.) If p∈F−1(Z)∩int⁡W, then F∣int⁡W is smooth and transverse to Z on the boundaryless manifold int⁡W, so [F4] shows that F−1(Z)∩int⁡W is an embedded submanifold of int⁡W of codimension c with the stated tangent space; in the chart x this exhibits F−1(Z) near p as a coordinate subspace {xn−c+1=⋯=xn=0} intersected with the chart, so p is an interior point of F−1(Z).

2.2F1F2F3F6step 1.1construct

(Boundary points.) If p∈F−1(Z)∩∂W, then in the coordinates of 1.1 the differential dGp:Rn→Rc is surjective and, by the face part of 1.1, its restriction to the face Rn−1×{0} is surjective. Choose a set A of c coordinate directions inside the face on which the resulting square minor of dGp is invertible, let B be the remaining n−1−c face directions, and define Φ:=(G, xB, xn) near p. Its differential is block triangular with invertible diagonal blocks, hence invertible; by [F6] the components extend smoothly to an open neighbourhood of p in Rn, so the inverse function theorem makes Φ a local diffeomorphism at p. Since Φ has last coordinate xn, it carries {G=0, xn≥0}=F−1(Z) near p onto the relatively open subset {0}×Rn−1−c×[0,∞) of the half-space Hn−c; therefore F−1(Z) is near p an embedded (n−c)-dimensional submanifold with boundary, with boundary exactly F−1(Z)∩∂W and tangent space {v∈TpW:dFp(v)∈TzZ}, and the chart Φ simultaneously straightens the preimage and the face.

3.1F4F5step 2.1step 2.2given∎

(Assembly.) The charts produced in 2.1 and 2.2 cover F−1(Z); any two of them are restrictions of charts of W, so their transitions are restrictions of smooth half-space transitions and the induced structure is a smooth structure on F−1(Z) making it an embedded submanifold with boundary of W, of dimension n−c=dim⁡W−codim⁡Z, with the tangent formula and with interior F−1(Z)∩int⁡W and boundary F−1(Z)∩∂W=(F∣∂W)−1(Z). If n−c≥1, the local model of 2.2 shows that the preimage is transverse to ∂W and meets it exactly in its boundary, so F−1(Z) is neat and ∂F−1(Z)=F−1(Z)∩∂W; the charts of 2.2 are precisely the boundary-adapted slice charts of [F5]. If n−c=0, boundary points are impossible because the face differential would have rank c=n on an (n−1)-dimensional space. The preimage is discrete, lies in the interior, and has empty boundary. If n<c, even the full differential cannot be surjective, so the preimage is empty. The construction uses the charts named at each point and no choice principle; the atlas of the preimage is the set of all charts so obtained.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources