How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transverse preimages for maps from manifolds with boundary
Statement
Let be a smooth manifold with boundary, a smooth manifold without boundary, a closed embedded submanifold, and a smooth map. Suppose that at every the differential is transverse to , , and that the restriction is transverse to . Then is an embedded smooth submanifold with boundary of of dimension , with
and . If , then is neat and
If , transversality of the boundary restriction forces : a space of dimension cannot surject onto the normal directions. Thus the zero-dimensional preimage also has the asserted empty boundary. If , the preimage is empty by the same rank bound. These include the empty-preimage cases.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map from a manifold with boundary to a boundaryless manifold, a closed embedded submanifold of codimension , and transversality of and of to .
A slice chart for at is a chart with ; the last coordinates of then define a submersion on with zero set (Embedded submanifolds and slice charts).
Transversality of to means at every , and is transverse to when the same condition holds for the restricted differential on at every (A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold).
Boundary charts of are homeomorphisms with (Smooth charts, atlases, and structures with boundary).
If is smooth on a boundaryless manifold and transverse to , then is an embedded submanifold of codimension with (The transverse preimage theorem).
An embedded submanifold with boundary is neat when and is transverse to ; a neat submanifold has boundary charts simultaneously straightening and (Neat submanifolds of a manifold with boundary, Neat submanifolds have boundary-adapted slice charts).
A smooth function on a relatively open subset of extends locally to a smooth function on an open subset of , and the chain rule holds for smooth maps between manifolds with boundary (Smooth functions on relatively open half-space sets, Smooth maps between manifolds with boundary). The Euclidean inverse function theorem applies to an invertible local extension (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).
Proof
Fix and put ; write and . At a boundary point choose a boundary chart with ; at an interior point use an ordinary Euclidean chart centred at and a slice chart of at with , and let be the last coordinates of on . Then is defined near on a relatively open half-space set, and for near one has exactly when . At such a the differential is surjective: is surjective with kernel , so its image of is , which is all of by [F2]. At boundary points, on the face the same computation with in place of is surjective by the transversality of .
(Interior points.) If , then is smooth and transverse to on the boundaryless manifold , so [F4] shows that is an embedded submanifold of of codimension with the stated tangent space; in the chart this exhibits near as a coordinate subspace intersected with the chart, so is an interior point of .
(Boundary points.) If , then in the coordinates of 1.1 the differential is surjective and, by the face part of 1.1, its restriction to the face is surjective. Choose a set of coordinate directions inside the face on which the resulting square minor of is invertible, let be the remaining face directions, and define near . Its differential is block triangular with invertible diagonal blocks, hence invertible; by [F6] the components extend smoothly to an open neighbourhood of in , so the inverse function theorem makes a local diffeomorphism at . Since has last coordinate , it carries near onto the relatively open subset of the half-space ; therefore is near an embedded -dimensional submanifold with boundary, with boundary exactly and tangent space , and the chart simultaneously straightens the preimage and the face.
(Assembly.) The charts produced in 2.1 and 2.2 cover ; any two of them are restrictions of charts of , so their transitions are restrictions of smooth half-space transitions and the induced structure is a smooth structure on making it an embedded submanifold with boundary of , of dimension , with the tangent formula and with interior and boundary . If , the local model of 2.2 shows that the preimage is transverse to and meets it exactly in its boundary, so is neat and ; the charts of 2.2 are precisely the boundary-adapted slice charts of [F5]. If , boundary points are impossible because the face differential would have rank on an -dimensional space. The preimage is discrete, lies in the interior, and has empty boundary. If , even the full differential cannot be surjective, so the preimage is empty. The construction uses the charts named at each point and no choice principle; the atlas of the preimage is the set of all charts so obtained.
Depends on
- A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold
- The transverse preimage theorem
- Embedded smooth submanifolds with boundary
- Neat submanifolds of a manifold with boundary
- Neat submanifolds have boundary-adapted slice charts
- Boundary submanifolds of a boundaryless manifold have half-slice charts
- Smooth functions on relatively open half-space sets
- Smooth maps between manifolds with boundary
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Embedded submanifolds and slice charts
- Smooth charts, atlases, and structures with boundary
- The Euclidean inverse function theorem
Used by
- A cycle has zero algebraic intersection with a bounding cycle Corollary
- Oriented boundary of an intersection trace has opposite end signs Lemma
- Preimage orientation agrees with the local intersection sign Lemma
- Properness can replace compactness only when the intersection trace is compact Remark
- The mod 2 intersection number is homotopy invariant Theorem
- The oriented intersection number is homotopy invariant Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Victor Guillemin and Alan Pollack, Differential Topology (Prentice-Hall, 1974; complete 236-page PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Milnor, Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint (Princeton University Press; complete 76-page PDF, including the appendix Classifying 1-manifolds) (standard reference, not scraped)