How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One-step ODE Consistency and Local Error — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- One-step ODE Consistency and Local Error
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
Summary
Compute Euler's local defect exactly on and verify its order-one behavior. A separate explicit-midpoint calculation on shows why a nonsmooth field can destroy the smooth-field order-two local error bound.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Forward Euler on the scalar linear equation
Example
For the IVP , , the exact solution is . The forward Euler map is . Its local defect from the exact value is
For every fixed finite interval with , this defect is uniformly in as , so the local order is exactly one. The one-step stability factor is .
Verification
Given: , , and the Euler map . Verify the defect and its order.
[F1] One-step ODE methods, local defect, uniform order, and step stability: the local defect is , and order one requires a uniform bound.
[F2] Forward Euler has uniform local order one and a one-step Lipschitz bound: under its continuous-partial-derivative and uniform-bound hypotheses, Euler has a componentwise local defect and one-step bound .
[F3] Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment: for a scalar function, Taylor's formula through degree one has a second-derivative Lagrange remainder at an interior point of the segment.
Fix , let , and take and . These are an open domain with convex state fibers and a compact subset . For , the bounds in [F2] hold throughout with , , , and . The function solves the IVP, its graph on lies in , and for every the Euler output state lies between and , so its input and output pairs lie in . Starting from , Euler returns and the exact endpoint is . Therefore [F1] gives .
Apply [F3] to at with increment : there is with . Thus .
Since , for we have . The lower and upper bounds establish uniform error, hence order exactly one under [F1].
For any scalar inputs , . This verifies the stated stability factor; it also agrees with [F2] for and .
Remarks
The exact calculation is local: it does not turn a local defect estimate into a global trajectory bound. The Taylor formula here is used only for this smooth scalar example.
A time kink reduces the explicit midpoint local order
Example
On the domain , consider with exact solution and the explicit midpoint step
For , use the fixed compact time-state rectangle . On the step starting at , the exact solution segment, the method input, midpoint stage, and method output all lie in . This step has local defect . As these admitted starting times stay in and the defect is , so the uniform local order-two bound fails at the time kink.
Verification
Given: , , , and the displayed explicit midpoint map. Compute its local defect on .
[F1] One-step ODE methods, local defect, uniform order, and step stability: the local defect is method output from an exact starting value minus the exact endpoint; uniform local order two requires a uniform bound.
For , and ; for , and . At , . Hence is the exact solution through .
At , the exact value is and the explicit midpoint stage time is , where for every stage value . Thus , while .
Therefore . The exact segment has and ; the input and output states are , and the midpoint stage state is , all in . Their time coordinates also lie in , so the definition applies on the fixed compact set . If a uniform order-two bound held, for every , forcing as , which is impossible.
For an arbitrary and , the method increment from the exact state is . If lies on either side of , then is quadratic there and this increment equals , so the defect is zero. If , put . Using and gives for and for . Thus every crossing step has , and the same bound holds for every step. In particular, it holds uniformly for all admitted starts and steps in ; together with step 3.1, the uniform local order is exactly one.
Remarks
Hairer–Nørsett–Wanner's midpoint construction and its order discussion assume sufficient smoothness; this verification does not import a smooth-field order theorem. It directly disproves an local bound at the nonsmooth time kink.