How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Barycentric rational and aaa approximation — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Barycentric rational and aaa approximation
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Computed singular values and rank revealing factorizations
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Direct Matrix Factorisations: LU, Cholesky and QR
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite-precision direct factorizations and least squares
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Limits of Real Functions
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Matrix Norms, Condition Numbers and Numerical Stability
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Splitting Fields
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Spectral Theorem, Positive Operators and Singular Value Decomposition
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The examples verify an exact AAA recovery of a scalar transfer-function pole, a zero sampled residual with arbitrarily large error at an unsampled point, and the distinct defects of a singular Padé system and a solved Padé approximant with a small-residue pole-zero pair. Each calculation uses exact algebra and stays within the finite-sample or local Taylor guarantees proved on the companion page.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Padé matching can be singular or create a Froissart doublet
Example
This example exhibits a rank-deficient normalized moment system, an inconsistent full-order system, and a Padé pole-zero pair for an entire polynomial target. It shows why coefficient matching alone supplies no pole-location or analytic-continuation guarantee. A close pole-zero pair with small residue is called a Froissart doublet.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The exact Padé coefficient procedure, and the coefficient lists , , and with .
Exact Padé coefficient matching with defect statuses: for type , the normalized denominator equations are for ; the procedure reports inconsistent or consistent rank-deficient systems separately.
A solvable Padé moment system gives the stated Taylor order: a solved normalized system gives near .
Verification
For and type , the sole equation is , namely . It is consistent with rank zero, so [F1] returns . If one arbitrarily selects , the convolution formula gives and ; after canceling their common factor the rational function is the constant , so the apparent zero of the unreduced denominator is not a pole.
For and type , the sole equation is , namely . Thus [F1] returns : no normalized denominator attains the full matching order.
For and type , the equation is , so its unique solution is . The numerator coefficients are and . Thus Its denominator has a simple zero at while the numerator there equals , so this is a genuine pole. The numerator zero is , and its distance from the pole is . The residue at the pole is . Hence the exact coefficient-matching rational function has a pole-zero pair with arbitrarily small separation and residue as , although the target is a polynomial.
For the system is solved, so [F2] gives only the stated local Taylor order at the origin. Step 1.3 shows that this does not prevent a nearby pole-zero pair, while step 1.1 shows that a singular system can leave denominator coefficients nonunique. Neither case supplies analytic continuation or a target pole-location guarantee.
Zero AAA sample residual can coexist with arbitrary off-grid error
Example
Let the sample set be and, for any , let on . Exact AAA with support budget , sweep budget , and tolerance zero starts at the constant mean of the two samples and returns immediately with zero sampled residual, but its uniform error is . For a continuous on , write .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the two sample points , data , support budget , sweep budget , tolerance , and the exact AAA procedure.
Finite-sample AAA rational approximation with exact SVD: the initial candidate is the sample mean, and the procedure stops when the maximum sample residual is at most the supplied tolerance.
Verification
The sample values are , so their mean is zero and the initial candidate is the zero function. Its residual at both sample points is zero, hence the tolerance-zero stopping rule in [F1] returns before selecting any support node.
At the unsampled point , and . Since on , the uniform error is exactly , while the sampled residual is zero. Since is arbitrary, no finite uniform off-grid error bound follows from this sample residual alone.
AAA recovers a scalar transfer-function pole from four samples
Example
The scalar transfer function with and is . On the ordered sample set , exact AAA with support budget , tolerance , and bidiagonal-QR sweep budget selects support nodes and and returns the exact transfer function. Its reduced denominator has the true pole .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sample set , data , support budget , tolerance , sweep budget , and the exact AAA procedure.
Finite-sample AAA rational approximation with exact SVD: the initial candidate is the sample mean; the Loewner entries are ; the next support is a remaining sample with maximal absolute residual, ties going to the least original index; each iteration chooses a unit smallest-singular-vector weight for the Loewner matrix.
AAA weights minimize the Loewner residual and interpolate support data: the selected vector minimizes the Loewner residual, and a barycentric candidate with nonzero weights interpolates its support data.
Barycentric rational quotient with support values and reduced poles: the quotient has numerator and denominator , with poles taken from the reduced denominator.
Householder bidiagonalization and its finite precision status: the exact reduction applies the specified left Householder to the first column, then a right Householder to the remaining active row.
Finite budget implicit shifted QR for bidiagonal singular values: with zero deflation tolerance, the exact shifted QR procedure uses the nearest eigenvalue of the trailing block of , breaks a tie toward the smaller eigenvalue, performs at most block sweeps, and checks deflation before the budget branch on each new pass.
Real Givens rotations and complex Givens transformations: the displayed real rotation has the prescribed real Givens block.
Exact unitary equivalence of Householder bidiagonalization: the exact negative-phase Householder construction in [F4] sends each nonzero active vector to its signed norm in the first coordinate and leaves zero active vectors unchanged.
Verification
The data in order are , with mean zero. Thus , so the initial tolerance test does not return. Their largest absolute residuals are tied at and ; [F1] selects the earlier sample . The first Loewner matrix is the single column , since its entries are Since its right domain is one-dimensional, the selected unit weight is under the phase rule. Its Householder reduction has a single diagonal entry; by [F5] there is only a singleton block, so the SVD call converges without using a sweep. The one-support quotient is the constant . Its remaining residual magnitudes are at , respectively, so and the second support is .
The remaining sample points are and . In that row and support order, the Loewner matrix is The rows are negatives of one another and , so has rank one, its smallest singular value is zero, and its right nullspace is spanned by . The orthogonal projection of onto this line is ; normalizing it and applying the positive-real phase rule [F1] gives , whose components are both nonzero.
At the second support addition the Loewner matrix in step 1.2 is Its first column has norm and its second is its negative. By [F4] and [F7], the left Householder sends the first column to and the second to . The one-dimensional right active scalar is ; its phase is , its reflector vector is , and its Householder factor is . Thus the bidiagonal reduction returns Then Its eigenvalues are and , each at distance from the trailing diagonal entry , so [F5] chooses shift . The initial shift vector is . The real Givens factor satisfies , and . The left rotation is the identity because the subdiagonal entry is already zero. Thus one block sweep makes the superdiagonal zero; the next zero-tolerance pass deflates it and sees only singleton blocks before checking the exhausted budget, so the SVD call succeeds with .
Substitution into the barycentric quotient [F3] gives The denominator reduces to a nonzero constant times , so its sole finite pole is . The values at are ; the support values at are by [F2]. Thus the quotient matches all four data, and has no pole at either remaining sample point.
All four sample values match, so the second candidate has maximum sampled residual . By [F1], the tolerance branch returns the exact quotient.
Sources
- Pedro Gonnet, Stefan Güttel, and Lloyd N. Trefethen, Robust Padé Approximation via SVD, Sections 2 and 5
- Yuji Nakatsukasa, Olivier Sète, and Lloyd N. Trefethen, The AAA algorithm for rational approximation, Sections 3–4
- Yuji Nakatsukasa, Olivier Sète, and Lloyd N. Trefethen, The AAA algorithm for rational approximation, Sections 2–4