How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coulomb potential has nonlocal equal-time commutator
Statement refuted
Assume Countable Choice and the equal-time Coulomb-gauge potential commutator and transverse-projector kernel in Smeared Coulomb photon operator distribution and Newtonian off-diagonal kernel of the transverse projector. The distribution kernel of every is supported on the diagonal ; equivalently, its pairing with every pair of smooth compactly supported tests having disjoint spatial supports vanishes.
Construction
Assume Countable Choice and the transverse-projector kernel of Newtonian off-diagonal kernel of the transverse projector. The equal-time commutator in Smeared Coulomb photon operator distribution is For and on the nonzero axis, the off-diagonal kernel is Thus the Coulomb-gauge potential has a nonzero commutator kernel away from the diagonal and is not a local observable. This counterexample does not imply nonlocality of the gauge-invariant field strength.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the equal-time potential commutator; the Newtonian projector-kernel identity and its off-origin derivative; and compact smooth test functions.
Assume Countable Choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
At equal time, . Smeared Coulomb photon operator distribution
, and on the nonzero axis . Newtonian off-diagonal kernel of the transverse projector
Every open ball contains a nonnegative compactly supported smooth bump positive on a smaller ball. A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
Counterexample
Given: [A1], [F1]–[F3].
Choose a nonzero point on the axis. The delta term vanishes away from the origin, and by [F2] the real function is continuous and strictly positive near . Thus the commutator kernel is continuous and nowhere zero on a sufficiently small neighborhood of .
Choose nonnegative smooth tests from [F3], supported in small disjoint balls centered at points whose difference is , with the difference of their supports contained in that neighborhood and both positive on smaller balls. The delta term in [F1] pairs to zero because the supports are disjoint. The remaining pairing is times the integral of the strictly positive real kernel against , which is a positive real number before multiplication by and hence is nonzero. Therefore the commutator pairing is nonzero for disjoint supports, so its kernel is not supported on the diagonal. The potential is nonlocal; the separate field-strength locality result is unaffected.