How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Connectedness
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Cw Complexes and Cellular Homology
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Dirac Clifford matrices and energy projections
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces Adjoint Operators and Annihilators
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fourier Transform Convolution and Approximate Identities
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Solutions Newtonian Potentials and Green Functions
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Homology Axioms Degree and Classical Applications
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Densities and Radon Volume on Manifolds
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Qm Math Composites
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Relative Homology Excision and Mayer Vietoris
- Retarded fields and radiation
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Scalar future mass-shell measure and test restriction
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Simplicial Subdivision and Simplicial Approximation
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Spacetime Primitives
- Stone–Weierstrass in General
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tempered Distributions and the Fourier Transform
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Divergence Theorem and Classical Stokes
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Real Gamma and Beta Functions
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Unbounded Self Adjoint Operators and Stones Theorem
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Volumes of Elementary Solids and Solids of Revolution
- Wave Equation Representation Formulas
2 · Summary
The examples check the rank-two physical polarization fiber and local frame construction, exhibit a negative-form auxiliary vector excluded by the subsidiary condition, and compute the off-diagonal Coulomb-potential commutator. The periodic constant-charge example shows why the zero-mean hypothesis is necessary for the smooth torus solver. The potential counterexample does not challenge the separate locality proof for field strength. These are conditional mathematical examples; no measurement, continuum-interacting model, or universal boundary-condition claim is asserted.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Two physical photon fibers without global frame
Example
Assume Countable Choice. For each nonzero , the physical photon fiber is the real plane (or its complexification), where , and therefore has dimension two. Locally in direction space one can choose two continuous orthonormal polarization vectors. There is no continuous real orthonormal polarization frame on all of . The global subsidiary quotient of Lorenz auxiliary subsidiary null quotient is isometric to the transverse space of square-integrable sections from Positive transverse photon one-particle space. At a fixed direction , the auxiliary fiber , with form , has radical and quotient isometric to the complex transverse plane. Thus four auxiliary components do not represent four positive physical polarizations; the global section space is not a single fiber.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the transverse projection, the subsidiary quotient, and the no-global-frame lemma.
Assume Countable Choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The range of is the rank-two plane . Positive transverse photon one-particle space
The global subsidiary quotient is isometric to by ; these are spaces of square-integrable sections. Lorenz auxiliary subsidiary null quotient
The transverse planes over admit no global continuous real orthonormal frame. No global continuous real polarization frame
The cross product is orthogonal to both factors and satisfies . The cross product in The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors
Verification
Given: [A1] and [F1]–[F3].
Since is unit, has kernel and range , of dimension , by [F1]. For any fixed unit vector not parallel to , is nonzero on a neighborhood of ; there define and . By [F4], is orthogonal to both unit vectors and . It is therefore a continuous unit vector in , orthogonal to , so the two vectors form a local frame.
For the fixed-direction fiber in the example, define . Since and , its image lies in , and for every . Writing and gives . Its radical is therefore : a radical vector pairs with itself to give , and every kernel vector pairs to zero with all others. Thus is a positive isometry of onto the two-complex-dimensional plane of step 1.1. In contrast, [F2] identifies the global quotient with , the space of square-integrable sections of these planes. A global continuous real frame would contradict [F3], so the local construction cannot extend over the whole sphere.
Auxiliary timelike vector has negative form
Statement refuted
Assume Countable Choice and the indefinite auxiliary form and subsidiary quotient of Lorenz auxiliary subsidiary null quotient. Every vector in the auxiliary space has nonnegative quadratic form .
Construction
Assume Countable Choice. Let . Then because and . Its Lebesgue measure is by A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included. Set . Then but because on . Therefore this negative-form auxiliary vector is not a physical state in the subsidiary quotient.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, the indefinite auxiliary form and subsidiary space, and the null-quotient interface.
Assume Countable Choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The physical subsidiary space requires almost everywhere; only its null quotient is positive. Lorenz auxiliary subsidiary null quotient
The Lebesgue measure of a rectangular box is the product of its side lengths. A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included
Counterexample
Given: [A1], [F1], and the box in the statement.
The box has measure by [F2], so . Its spatial components vanish and its time component equals one on , hence
On , , so the subsidiary condition in [F1] fails on a set of measure by [F2]. The quotient in [F1] is formed only from ; this vector is outside that space and cannot represent a negative-norm physical quotient class.
Coulomb potential has nonlocal equal-time commutator
Statement refuted
Assume Countable Choice and the equal-time Coulomb-gauge potential commutator and transverse-projector kernel in Smeared Coulomb photon operator distribution and Newtonian off-diagonal kernel of the transverse projector. The distribution kernel of every is supported on the diagonal ; equivalently, its pairing with every pair of smooth compactly supported tests having disjoint spatial supports vanishes.
Construction
Assume Countable Choice and the transverse-projector kernel of Newtonian off-diagonal kernel of the transverse projector. The equal-time commutator in Smeared Coulomb photon operator distribution is For and on the nonzero axis, the off-diagonal kernel is Thus the Coulomb-gauge potential has a nonzero commutator kernel away from the diagonal and is not a local observable. This counterexample does not imply nonlocality of the gauge-invariant field strength.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the equal-time potential commutator; the Newtonian projector-kernel identity and its off-origin derivative; and compact smooth test functions.
Assume Countable Choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
At equal time, . Smeared Coulomb photon operator distribution
, and on the nonzero axis . Newtonian off-diagonal kernel of the transverse projector
Every open ball contains a nonnegative compactly supported smooth bump positive on a smaller ball. A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
Counterexample
Given: [A1], [F1]–[F3].
Choose a nonzero point on the axis. The delta term vanishes away from the origin, and by [F2] the real function is continuous and strictly positive near . Thus the commutator kernel is continuous and nowhere zero on a sufficiently small neighborhood of .
Choose nonnegative smooth tests from [F3], supported in small disjoint balls centered at points whose difference is , with the difference of their supports contained in that neighborhood and both positive on smaller balls. The delta term in [F1] pairs to zero because the supports are disjoint. The remaining pairing is times the integral of the strictly positive real kernel against , which is a positive real number before multiplication by and hence is nonzero. Therefore the commutator pairing is nonzero for disjoint supports, so its kernel is not supported on the diagonal. The potential is nonlocal; the separate field-strength locality result is unaffected.
Periodic smooth Gauss excludes nonzero net charge
Statement refuted
Assume Countable Choice, , and the periodic Coulomb-gauge Gauss equation of Gauss multiplier and smooth periodic Coulomb solver. For every smooth periodic charge density on , there exists a smooth periodic potential satisfying .
Construction
Assume Countable Choice and the periodic Gauss constraint of Gauss multiplier and smooth periodic Coulomb solver. On , take the nonzero constant smooth charge density with . There is no smooth periodic potential satisfying . More generally, every smooth periodic solution of Gauss's equation in Coulomb gauge requires zero total charge. A boundary, puncture, or compensating background changes the hypotheses and is outside this counterexample.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; ; a smooth periodic potential; and the Coulomb-gauge Gauss equation.
Assume Countable Choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
In Coulomb gauge the periodic Gauss constraint is . Gauss multiplier and smooth periodic Coulomb solver
Counterexample
Given: [A1], [F1], , and periodic boundary conditions.
Integrating [F1] over gives because for each the integral in is the difference of the periodic values of at and .
The right side of the same integrated equation is contradicting step 1.1. Thus no smooth periodic solution exists for this nonzero total charge; the same integration proves neutrality is necessary for any periodic solution.
Sources
- David Tong, Quantum Field Theory, Chapter 6, §6.2.2
- Mark Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory, author-hosted 2006 book draft, §§54–56
- Mark Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory, author-hosted 2006 book draft, §56
- David Tong, Quantum Field Theory, Chapter 6, §§6.2.1 and 6.4
- Mark Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory, author-hosted 2006 book draft, §§55–56
- David Tong, Quantum Field Theory, Chapter 6, §6.4
- Mark Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory, author-hosted 2006 book draft, §55