Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples check the rank-two physical polarization fiber and local frame construction, exhibit a negative-form auxiliary vector excluded by the subsidiary condition, and compute the off-diagonal Coulomb-potential commutator. The periodic constant-charge example shows why the zero-mean hypothesis is necessary for the smooth torus solver. The potential counterexample does not challenge the separate locality proof for field strength. These are conditional mathematical examples; no measurement, continuum-interacting model, or universal boundary-condition claim is asserted.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Two physical photon fibers without global frame

Example

Assume Countable Choice. For each nonzero k, the physical photon fiber is the real plane n⊥ (or its complexification), where n=k/∣k∣, and therefore has dimension two. Locally in direction space one can choose two continuous orthonormal polarization vectors. There is no continuous real orthonormal polarization frame on all of S2. The global subsidiary quotient K0/N of Lorenz auxiliary subsidiary null quotient is isometric to the transverse space HT of square-integrable sections from Positive transverse photon one-particle space. At a fixed direction n, the auxiliary fiber K0,n={(a,v)∈C×C3:n⋅v=a}, with form [(a,v),(b,w)]η=−a‾b+v‾⋅w, has radical Nn=C(1,n) and quotient isometric to the complex transverse plane. Thus four auxiliary components do not represent four positive physical polarizations; the global section space is not a single fiber.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the transverse projection, the subsidiary quotient, and the no-global-frame lemma.

[A1]
[F1]

The range of PT(n)=I−nnT is the rank-two plane n⊥. Positive transverse photon one-particle space

[F2]

The global subsidiary quotient K0/N is isometric to HT by [ϵ]↦ϵ−nϵ0; these are spaces of square-integrable sections. Lorenz auxiliary subsidiary null quotient

[F3]

The transverse planes over S2 admit no global continuous real orthonormal frame. No global continuous real polarization frame

[F4]

The cross product is orthogonal to both factors and satisfies ∥u×v∥2=∥u∥2∥v∥2−⟨u,v⟩2. The cross product in R3 The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors

Verification

Given: [A1] and [F1]–[F3].

1.1A1F1F4givenconstruct

Since n is unit, PT(n)=I−nnT has kernel Rn and range n⊥, of dimension 3−1=2, by [F1]. For any fixed unit vector u not parallel to n0, PT(n)u is nonzero on a neighborhood of n0; there define e1(n)=PT(n)u/∣PT(n)u∣ and e2(n)=n×e1(n). By [F4], e2 is orthogonal to both unit vectors and ∣e2∣2=1−0=1. It is therefore a continuous unit vector in n⊥, orthogonal to e1, so the two vectors form a local frame.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

For the fixed-direction fiber in the example, define Tn(a,v)=v−na. Since n⋅v=a and n⋅n=1, its image lies in n⊥⊂C3, and Tn(0,z)=z for every z∈n⊥. Writing v=Tn(a,v)+na and w=Tn(b,w)+nb gives [(a,v),(b,w)]η=Tn(a,v)‾⋅Tn(b,w). Its radical is therefore ker⁡Tn=C(1,n): a radical vector pairs with itself to give ∥Tn(a,v)∥2=0, and every kernel vector pairs to zero with all others. Thus [(a,v)]↦Tn(a,v) is a positive isometry of K0,n/Nn onto the two-complex-dimensional plane of step 1.1. In contrast, [F2] identifies the global quotient with HT, the space of square-integrable sections of these planes. A global continuous real frame would contradict [F3], so the local construction cannot extend over the whole sphere.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Auxiliary timelike vector has negative form

Statement refuted

Assume Countable Choice and the indefinite auxiliary form and subsidiary quotient of Lorenz auxiliary subsidiary null quotient. Every vector in the auxiliary space K has nonnegative quadratic form [ϵ,ϵ]η.

Construction

Assume Countable Choice. Let E=(5/4,3/2)×(−1/8,1/8)2. Then E⊂{k:1<∣k∣<2} because ∣k∣>5/4 and ∣k∣2<(3/2)2+2(1/8)2<4. Its Lebesgue measure is ∣E∣=(1/4)3=1/64 by A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included. Set ϵ(k)=1E(k)(1,0,0,0)∈K. Then [ϵ,ϵ]η=−1/64<0, but ϵ∉K0 because −ϵ0+n⋅ϵ=−1 on E. Therefore this negative-form auxiliary vector is not a physical state in the subsidiary quotient.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the indefinite auxiliary form and subsidiary space, and the null-quotient interface.

[A1]
[F1]

The physical subsidiary space requires −ϵ0+n⋅ϵ=0 almost everywhere; only its null quotient is positive. Lorenz auxiliary subsidiary null quotient

Counterexample

Given: [A1], [F1], and the box E in the statement.

1.1A1F2givenalgebra

The box E has measure 1/64 by [F2], so ϵ∈L2(R3;C4). Its spatial components vanish and its time component equals one on E, hence [ϵ,ϵ]η=∫E(−1) d3k=−1/64<0.

2.1F1F2step 1.1given∎

On E, −ϵ0+n⋅ϵ=−1, so the subsidiary condition in [F1] fails on a set of measure 1/64>0 by [F2]. The quotient in [F1] is formed only from K0; this vector is outside that space and cannot represent a negative-norm physical quotient class.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Coulomb potential has nonlocal equal-time commutator

Statement refuted

Assume Countable Choice and the equal-time Coulomb-gauge potential commutator and transverse-projector kernel in Smeared Coulomb photon operator distribution and Newtonian off-diagonal kernel of the transverse projector. The distribution kernel of every [Ai(x),Ej(y)] is supported on the diagonal x=y; equivalently, its pairing with every pair of smooth compactly supported tests having disjoint spatial supports vanishes.

Construction

Assume Countable Choice and the transverse-projector kernel of Newtonian off-diagonal kernel of the transverse projector. The equal-time commutator in Smeared Coulomb photon operator distribution is [Ai(x),Ej(y)]=−i(δijδ3(x−y)+∂i∂jG(x−y)),G(x)=14π∣x∣. For i=j=1 and x−y on the nonzero x1 axis, the off-diagonal kernel is ∂12G(x−y)=24π∣x−y∣3>0. Thus the Coulomb-gauge potential has a nonzero commutator kernel away from the diagonal and is not a local observable. This counterexample does not imply nonlocality of the gauge-invariant field strength.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the equal-time potential commutator; the Newtonian projector-kernel identity and its off-origin derivative; and compact smooth test functions.

[A1]
[F1]

At equal time, [Ai(x),Ej(y)]=−iPT,ij(−i∇)δ3(x−y). Smeared Coulomb photon operator distribution

[F2]

PT,ijδ3=δijδ3+∂i∂jG, and on the nonzero x1 axis ∂12G=2/(4πr3)>0. Newtonian off-diagonal kernel of the transverse projector

[F3]

Every open ball contains a nonnegative compactly supported smooth bump positive on a smaller ball. A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls

Counterexample

Given: [A1], [F1]–[F3].

1.1A1F2given

Choose a nonzero point z0 on the x1 axis. The delta term vanishes away from the origin, and by [F2] the real function ∂12G is continuous and strictly positive near z0. Thus the commutator kernel −i∂12G is continuous and nowhere zero on a sufficiently small neighborhood of z0.

2.1F1F3step 1.1given∎

Choose nonnegative smooth tests f,g from [F3], supported in small disjoint balls centered at points whose difference is z0, with the difference of their supports contained in that neighborhood and both positive on smaller balls. The delta term in [F1] pairs to zero because the supports are disjoint. The remaining pairing is −i times the integral of the strictly positive real kernel ∂12G against f(x)g(y), which is a positive real number before multiplication by −i and hence is nonzero. Therefore the commutator pairing is nonzero for disjoint supports, so its kernel is not supported on the diagonal. The potential is nonlocal; the separate field-strength locality result is unaffected.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Periodic smooth Gauss excludes nonzero net charge

Statement refuted

Assume Countable Choice, L,ϵ0>0, and the periodic Coulomb-gauge Gauss equation of Gauss multiplier and smooth periodic Coulomb solver. For every smooth periodic charge density ρ on TL3, there exists a smooth periodic potential ϕ satisfying −Δϕ=ρ/ϵ0.

Construction

Assume Countable Choice and the periodic Gauss constraint of Gauss multiplier and smooth periodic Coulomb solver. On TL3, take the nonzero constant smooth charge density ρ(x)=ρ0 with ρ0≠0. There is no smooth periodic potential satisfying −Δϕ=ρ0/ϵ0. More generally, every smooth periodic solution of Gauss's equation in Coulomb gauge requires zero total charge. A boundary, puncture, or compensating background changes the hypotheses and is outside this counterexample.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; L,ϵ0>0; a smooth periodic potential; and the Coulomb-gauge Gauss equation.

[A1]
[F1]

In Coulomb gauge the periodic Gauss constraint is −Δϕ=ρ/ϵ0. Gauss multiplier and smooth periodic Coulomb solver

Counterexample

Given: [A1], [F1], ρ0≠0, and periodic boundary conditions.

1.1F1givenalgebra

Integrating [F1] over [0,L]3 gives ∫[0,L]3−Δϕ d3x=−∑j=13∫0L ⁣∫[0,L]2∂j2ϕ d2xj^ dxj=0, because for each j the integral in xj is the difference of the periodic values of ∂jϕ at L and 0.

2.1A1F1step 1.1given∎

The right side of the same integrated equation is ϵ0−1∫[0,L]3ρ0 d3x=ϵ0−1ρ0L3≠0, contradicting step 1.1. Thus no smooth periodic solution exists for this nonzero total charge; the same integration proves neutrality is necessary for any periodic solution.

Sources