How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite propagating-port scattering map
A conditional finite-channel interface for linear, fixed-frequency Maxwell scattering in one stationary material-rest frame. It assumes the listed propagating channels, their flux and reciprocal pairings, and a unique solution map at the chosen real frequency. Evanescent fields may be needed in the exact boundary matching. The definition proves no existence, uniqueness, completeness or empirical realization claim, and an omitted outgoing continuum must be separately counted.
Definition
Fix a real angular frequency in and use the convention and SI field units of the fixed-frequency reciprocal-phasor model. Let be a bounded device region with boundary in one stationary material-rest frame. Its continuous phasor coefficient maps are in and , respectively. The complex phasor fields have units and . They satisfy the fixed-frequency Maxwell equations of the reciprocal-phasor data class, with no impressed volume current or charge in . The corresponding real fields are and , with period . Assume as defined by the countable-choice axiom when the reciprocal boundary identity below is used.
An admissible port consists of a bounded connected cross-section in a plane perpendicular to a fixed unit guide axis , together with a uniform lossless straight reference guide extending from that section. The outward normal on the port points from into the guide. The reference-guide phasor coefficients and wall conditions are independent of distance along . A propagating channel mode is a pair of complex transverse profiles whose associated source-free phasor fields in the guide solve the fixed-frequency Maxwell equations and have longitudinal factor with real in . The profiles are normalized per unit amplitude in , so the resulting fields have units and . The plus and minus signs are assigned according to whether energy travels toward or away from . At , assume a finite list of propagating mode channels in total and that this list is complete for the propagating channels represented by the finite interface. Any outgoing radiation continuum or omitted propagating channel is separately recorded as nonnegative outward power . Evanescent modes may be required in the exact near-port matching field, but are not entries of the propagating amplitude vectors; no finite truncation of such matching modes is asserted to be exact.
Let and be the incoming and outgoing amplitudes. Choose the mode shapes and amplitude convention so that each coefficient has units , the Hermitian norm is in W, and the total time-averaged outward power through the port sections is
This equality, including the vanishing of cross terms in the real-power pairing, is a port-mode normalization hypothesis. For complex phasor fields the time-averaged Poynting vector is in , where denotes componentwise conjugation before the bilinear cross product. This Hermitian power pairing is distinct from the unconjugated Lorentz bilinear pairing.
On the non-port wall , the model prescribes either a smooth PEC condition , giving zero outward wall power, or a passive wall condition with explicitly specified nonnegative cycle-averaged outward power . Here and are the classical tangential restrictions of the smooth real fields. A smooth impedance wall is one such condition: for a real scalar surface admittance in siemens and , its instantaneous outward power density is , so its cycle-averaged outward power is nonnegative. For phasor amplitude , that average is . This is a smooth-field model assumption; no trace is inferred from membership in .
The total cycle-averaged outward boundary power is the port contribution , plus and any unlisted outgoing power . No unlisted incoming power is included.
For each , assume the adopted linear source-free Maxwell boundary problem has a unique time-harmonic solution and a unique outgoing vector . The model assumes no incoming wave in unlisted channels. By linearity of the phasor equations and uniqueness, the map is complex-linear: a linear combination of two solutions solves the problem for the same linear combination of their incoming data, and uniqueness identifies its outgoing data. The finite scattering matrix is the unique matrix such that . The definition assumes this well-posed solution map; it does not prove its existence, uniqueness, modal completeness, or absence of resonances.
For reciprocal use, the incoming and outgoing modal phases are additionally chosen so that for every pair of source-free solutions with incoming vectors and outgoing vectors , the Lorentz boundary pairing reduces to
This is an explicit reciprocal-normalization condition, using the complex-bilinear products of the reciprocal-phasor model and the bounded- reciprocity identity of the Lorentz reciprocity theorem. Power normalization alone does not imply this bilinear pairing for arbitrary complex reference impedances. Rephasing a port is allowed only when the declared reciprocal pairing is preserved.
Definition references
Port orientation
The arrows show the sign convention for two ports: incoming amplitudes point toward the device and outgoing amplitudes point away. The drawing records orientation only; the flux identities in the definition, not the drawing, determine the proofs.
Remarks
The rectangular-guide suppliers on the prerequisite page provide mode-profile results only under their stated rectangular, lossless hypotheses; their completeness theorem expressly does not prove an open-end scattering map. The finite channel basis and the unique scattering solution above therefore remain explicit interface assumptions. For an open radiating device, radiation power must be included in ; finite-channel unitarity is not concluded while that term is omitted.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Niklas Beisert, Elektrodynamik, ETH Zurich 2024 FS complete lecture script, 176 pages
- Weng Cho Chew, Theory of Microwave and Optical Waveguides, Purdue lecture notes, complete 362-page text
- Roger B. Marks and Dylan F. Williams, A General Waveguide Circuit Theory, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 97(5) (1992), pp. 533–562