How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Power-normalized scattering and passivity
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Anisotropic waves and reciprocity
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Causal oscillator media and passivity
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Coordinate and Path Transport
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Discrete de Rham complexes and edge-element foundations
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Em Elementary Mathematical Prerequisites
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Lorentz Transformations
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Material response and stationary interfaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Primitives and postulates
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Divergence Theorem and Classical Stokes
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vacuum waves and polarization
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weak Derivatives and Sobolev Spaces
- Weak fields, boundary power and dissipative uniqueness
- Worldlines And Clocks
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
Finite propagating-port scattering map
A conditional finite-channel interface for linear, fixed-frequency Maxwell scattering in one stationary material-rest frame. It assumes the listed propagating channels, their flux and reciprocal pairings, and a unique solution map at the chosen real frequency. Evanescent fields may be needed in the exact boundary matching. The definition proves no existence, uniqueness, completeness or empirical realization claim, and an omitted outgoing continuum must be separately counted.
Definition
Fix a real angular frequency in and use the convention and SI field units of the fixed-frequency reciprocal-phasor model. Let be a bounded device region with boundary in one stationary material-rest frame. Its continuous phasor coefficient maps are in and , respectively. The complex phasor fields have units and . They satisfy the fixed-frequency Maxwell equations of the reciprocal-phasor data class, with no impressed volume current or charge in . The corresponding real fields are and , with period . Assume as defined by the countable-choice axiom when the reciprocal boundary identity below is used.
An admissible port consists of a bounded connected cross-section in a plane perpendicular to a fixed unit guide axis , together with a uniform lossless straight reference guide extending from that section. The outward normal on the port points from into the guide. The reference-guide phasor coefficients and wall conditions are independent of distance along . A propagating channel mode is a pair of complex transverse profiles whose associated source-free phasor fields in the guide solve the fixed-frequency Maxwell equations and have longitudinal factor with real in . The profiles are normalized per unit amplitude in , so the resulting fields have units and . The plus and minus signs are assigned according to whether energy travels toward or away from . At , assume a finite list of propagating mode channels in total and that this list is complete for the propagating channels represented by the finite interface. Any outgoing radiation continuum or omitted propagating channel is separately recorded as nonnegative outward power . Evanescent modes may be required in the exact near-port matching field, but are not entries of the propagating amplitude vectors; no finite truncation of such matching modes is asserted to be exact.
Let and be the incoming and outgoing amplitudes. Choose the mode shapes and amplitude convention so that each coefficient has units , the Hermitian norm is in W, and the total time-averaged outward power through the port sections is
This equality, including the vanishing of cross terms in the real-power pairing, is a port-mode normalization hypothesis. For complex phasor fields the time-averaged Poynting vector is in , where denotes componentwise conjugation before the bilinear cross product. This Hermitian power pairing is distinct from the unconjugated Lorentz bilinear pairing.
On the non-port wall , the model prescribes either a smooth PEC condition , giving zero outward wall power, or a passive wall condition with explicitly specified nonnegative cycle-averaged outward power . Here and are the classical tangential restrictions of the smooth real fields. A smooth impedance wall is one such condition: for a real scalar surface admittance in siemens and , its instantaneous outward power density is , so its cycle-averaged outward power is nonnegative. For phasor amplitude , that average is . This is a smooth-field model assumption; no trace is inferred from membership in .
The total cycle-averaged outward boundary power is the port contribution , plus and any unlisted outgoing power . No unlisted incoming power is included.
For each , assume the adopted linear source-free Maxwell boundary problem has a unique time-harmonic solution and a unique outgoing vector . The model assumes no incoming wave in unlisted channels. By linearity of the phasor equations and uniqueness, the map is complex-linear: a linear combination of two solutions solves the problem for the same linear combination of their incoming data, and uniqueness identifies its outgoing data. The finite scattering matrix is the unique matrix such that . The definition assumes this well-posed solution map; it does not prove its existence, uniqueness, modal completeness, or absence of resonances.
For reciprocal use, the incoming and outgoing modal phases are additionally chosen so that for every pair of source-free solutions with incoming vectors and outgoing vectors , the Lorentz boundary pairing reduces to
This is an explicit reciprocal-normalization condition, using the complex-bilinear products of the reciprocal-phasor model and the bounded- reciprocity identity of the Lorentz reciprocity theorem. Power normalization alone does not imply this bilinear pairing for arbitrary complex reference impedances. Rephasing a port is allowed only when the declared reciprocal pairing is preserved.
Definition references
Port orientation
The arrows show the sign convention for two ports: incoming amplitudes point toward the device and outgoing amplitudes point away. The drawing records orientation only; the flux identities in the definition, not the drawing, determine the proofs.
Remarks
The rectangular-guide suppliers on the prerequisite page provide mode-profile results only under their stated rectangular, lossless hypotheses; their completeness theorem expressly does not prove an open-end scattering map. The finite channel basis and the unique scattering solution above therefore remain explicit interface assumptions. For an open radiating device, radiation power must be included in ; finite-channel unitarity is not concluded while that term is omitted.
Passivity gives a contractive scattering matrix
A conditional classical Maxwell scattering deduction at one real frequency for the finite port model of emx-port-scattering-channels. The material branches are exactly the homogeneous finite Lorentz oscillator or Drude current closures stated here; fields are smooth and periodic, free-current work is zero, wall power is nonnegative, and all unlisted outgoing power is counted. It is not an existence theorem, does not cover arbitrary passive constitutive laws, and makes no empirical claim.
Statement
Assume . Fix the finite port model at a real angular frequency and period , with bounded device region and scattering matrix . For every incoming amplitude , let be that model's unique phasor solution with outgoing amplitude , and set and . Assume for every such input that these real fields, , and the material states are jointly and -periodic, satisfy the smooth source-free macroscopic Maxwell equations with and , and obey the same one of the following two homogeneous material branches with coefficients independent of the input. The units of are respectively , , , and .
For real vectors , the Euclidean product is and .
The port model uses incoming and outgoing vectors with amplitude units ; for either vector , is its power in W, and the net outward port power is .
Finite Lorentz branch. For a finite , each has units , , , and , where and .
Drude branch. have units and , respectively; , , , and , where and .
The constants have the SI units of the respective adopted closure: in , in , each or in , and each or damping rate in . In the Lorentz branch define the loss-density map by ; in the Drude branch define it by . These have units . For the solution with the fixed input , set . Let be its cycle-averaged outward power at passive physical walls, and let be all its outgoing radiation or propagating-channel power not represented in , as defined by the port model. For brevity, in the proof write these three quantities as , , and . Then
For complex vectors and matrices, an overline denotes componentwise complex conjugation and a superscript denotes ordinary transpose; set for and for . A matrix is Hermitian when , and is unitary when , where is the identity matrix on .
Consequently is contractive: for every . If for every incoming vector , then ; because the defined map is square, is unitary. The exact equality and unitarity are conditional deductions of this model, not existence claims about arbitrary scatterers.
Statement references
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Finite propagating-port scattering map
The Euclidean inner product on
The divergence and curl of a cross product
Finite Lorentz oscillator closure
Drude current closure and collisionless limit
The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain
Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
Facts & Assumptions
Given: ; one fixed and ; for every input, the real obtained from that finite scattering model's phasor solution; the same stated homogeneous material branch with its positive parameters and nonnegative damping; smooth periodic real fields and material states for every input; zero free current; and nonnegative passive-wall and unlisted-outgoing powers. Fix an arbitrary input for the calculation below.
The Lorentz postulate has constant , , and the displayed second-order oscillator equations. Finite Lorentz oscillator closure
The Drude postulate has constant , , , and . Drude current closure and collisionless limit
On the smooth Maxwell branch, and . The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources
For real fields, . The divergence and curl of a cross product
Component products obey the ordinary product rule; the real Euclidean inner product is symmetric and componentwise bilinear. Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when The Euclidean inner product on
On a bounded device, the integral of the divergence of a real vector field equals its outward boundary flux under . Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain
Fubini's theorem permits exchanging the order of integration for an integrable function on the finite-volume product . Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
The port model defines the outward port flux as and the total outward boundary power as that port flux plus ; it assumes no unlisted incoming channel. Finite propagating-port scattering map
Physical wall conditions are either smooth PEC, with zero outward flux, or passive conditions with cycle-averaged outward power . This is an explicit model premise, not a trace theorem. Finite propagating-port scattering map
Proof
In the Lorentz branch set , and in the Drude branch set . From [L1] and [A1] or [A2], respectively, the field and constitutive equations give and .
In the Lorentz branch, dot the th oscillator equation [A1] with . Since , the division is valid; the product rule in [F2] gives . The last term is nonnegative because .
In the Drude branch, dot from [A2] with . The product rule and give , whose last term is nonnegative because .
Define the field energy density by . Differentiate it componentwise using [F2] and the field equations of step 1.1. This gives . Applying [F1] yields in the Lorentz branch and in the Drude branch.
Define the total field-plus-material energy density branchwise: in the Lorentz branch, ; in the Drude branch, . All terms are nonnegative, have SI units , and are jointly smooth and -periodic under the Statement's hypotheses. Substituting step 1.2 into the Lorentz field balance of step 2.1 cancels every term; substituting step 1.3 into its Drude balance cancels . Since the given source-free condition has , each branch therefore satisfies with exactly the loss density in the Statement.
Integrate the local identity of step 3.1 over at each time and apply [F3] to . Then integrate in time from to . The integrand is continuous and integrable on the finite product domain, so [F4] permits integration first in time: by periodicity. Hence the time-integrated outward boundary flux equals .
For the given phasor solution, expand each real part as in . The terms proportional to have zero average over , leaving . Thus the cycle average in step 4.1 is precisely the phasor power used by [F5]. Divide that step by and use its total boundary-flux decomposition: the port term is , the wall term is by [A3], and the remaining outgoing term is . Rearrangement gives the power balance for the arbitrary input . The all-input hypotheses permit this calculation for every incoming vector of the same matrix .
Since each of is nonnegative, step 5.1 gives for every ; taking nonnegative square roots proves contractivity. If all three powers vanish for every , set . Then because , and the power balance gives for every . Let denote the th coordinate vector of . Testing gives ; for , testing gives , while testing gives . Hence every entry of is zero, so . The square matrix is injective, hence surjective by finite-dimensional rank-nullity; therefore and as well. Thus is unitary.
Reciprocal port normalization gives symmetric scattering
A conditional fixed-frequency consequence for the reciprocal phasor model on a bounded C1 device with the reciprocal port-pairing convention of emx-port-scattering-model. It uses ordinary transpose for reciprocity and a separate Hermitian power pairing for energy. The symmetric-unitary conclusion requires zero operational net cycle-averaged material transfer, passive-wall outward power, and unlisted outgoing power for every input of the same port map. Smooth periodic finite Lorentz and Drude branches with matching harmonic coefficients and zero branch losses remain explicit sufficient cases. It asserts no time-reversal theorem, local passivity for arbitrary coefficients, existence of a scattering solution, or empirical realization.
Statement
Assume and the finite port model at a fixed real . Let be its unique scattering matrix. Suppose the continuous device phasor coefficient maps obey and pointwise, and for every pair of incoming vectors the corresponding source-free scattering solutions lie in and have reciprocal port modes satisfying the exact bilinear pairing stipulated in the model definition. Then
For , define its conjugate transpose by , where the overline is componentwise conjugation and a superscript is ordinary transpose; is Hermitian when and unitary when , with the identity on . The transpose relation above uses the unconjugated Lorentz pairing; the unitary relation below uses the separate conjugated Hermitian power pairing. No time-reversal claim follows.
For each incoming vector , define the operational net cycle-averaged material power transferred from the fields in this source-free phasor model by
Here for a complex column vector, and this power has units W. It is a signed net transfer, not an assumption of local passivity or a definition of a material realization. Let and be the nonnegative outward wall and unlisted-channel powers of the same finite-port model, whose total outward boundary power is . Then
Consequently, if all three powers vanish for every incoming vector , then , so is symmetric and unitary. Pointwise Hermitian and suffice to make for every input, since their quadratic forms are real; Hermitian symmetry is distinct from the ordinary transpose symmetry required for reciprocity. No constitutive branch beyond the stated phasor model is required for this operational zero-power conclusion.
The following full finite-port contraction hypotheses give additional Lorentz and Drude sufficient cases on this same port map. For every incoming vector, its real field maps and its material-state maps on that domain are jointly and -periodic, where , and satisfy the smooth source-free macroscopic Maxwell equations with .
The material closure is one of these two homogeneous, constant-coefficient branches. In the finite Lorentz branch, choose finite and maps for . They satisfy
with constant and . In the Drude branch, take maps . They satisfy
with constant and . Their SI units are those specified in the finite-port contraction model.
For each input, require the real fields and material states to have only this frequency: let be their phasor amplitudes with , and analogously for . In the Lorentz branch also write with ; in the Drude branch write in the same form with amplitudes . Substitution into the closure equations gives
where every Lorentz denominator is required nonzero, is the identity, and the magnetic coefficient is in either branch. Require these harmonic coefficient maps to be the continuous coefficients of this same reciprocal-phasor port model. The matrices are symmetric under ordinary transpose. The branch loss density is in the Lorentz branch and in the Drude branch, using the real vector norm . For the solution with incoming vector , define , and let and be its nonnegative passive-wall and unlisted-outgoing powers under the finite-port model's bookkeeping. The field, material-state, and parameter units are exactly those specified in that model.
In either harmonic branch, . Thus for every incoming vector is a sufficient case of the operational zero-power criterion, also supplied by the contraction result. These branch hypotheses are sufficient cases, not restrictions on the general phasor power identity above.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a unique finite scattering matrix , two source-free phasor solutions in the same reciprocal device, and reciprocal incoming/outgoing mode phases satisfying the bilinear pairing in the definition.
is the countable-choice axiom required by the bounded-domain reciprocity supplier. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The reciprocal port convention is ; the products are complex-bilinear and contain no conjugation. Finite propagating-port scattering map
For phasor solutions on a bounded domain, common continuous coefficients with ordinary transpose symmetry and , the source-free Lorentz boundary pairing is zero. The identity does not assume Hermitian coefficients or losslessness. Reciprocity in reciprocal linear media
Under the additional smooth -periodic, source-free field assumptions, the finite homogeneous Lorentz or Drude closure equations, and the branchwise loss and port bookkeeping stated for the unitary conclusion above, the contraction theorem gives when for every input . Passivity gives a contractive scattering matrix
For real vector fields on an open subset of , . The complex-bilinear version follows by expanding real and imaginary parts. The divergence and curl of a cross product
Under , on a bounded domain , each real vector field has finite volume-divergence and boundary-flux integrals, and these integrals agree. Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain
Proof
Choose arbitrary , and let be their unique source-free scattering solutions. The coefficient transpose equalities and the hypotheses in [L1] imply .
For any input , abbreviate its phasors by and . The source-free equations are and . Expanding [F2] into real and imaginary parts and then substituting these equations gives . Therefore the real field satisfies . The bounded domain and field regularity required by [F3] are precisely those in the port model. Its finite-integral conclusion applies to this identity and yields . Substituting the model's outward-power convention proves , with no unlisted incoming term.
Substitute [F1] and into step 1.1. Since , the result is for every .
For any coordinate vectors , step 2.1 gives . This holds for every pair , hence every entry of is zero and . No complex conjugation is introduced.
If these three powers vanish for every , step 1.2 gives for every , where is Hermitian. Taking gives . For , taking and gives respectively and , so . Thus . Its columns are orthonormal and hence linearly independent; in the -dimensional space they form a basis. For this gives , so also . Combining with step 3.1 proves the symmetric-unitary conclusion. For Hermitian coefficients, and likewise for , so their imaginary parts and vanish. No time-reversal conclusion is used.
In the stated Lorentz sufficient case, set ; the harmonic closure gives . Hence , while the magnetic quadratic form is real. Direct averaging of the real sinusoid gives . Thus its loss density average equals . For the Drude case, gives , and . Multiplication by gives the same equality with times this imaginary part. The formulas remain valid at zero damping, and the Lorentz nonzero-denominator condition is retained. Integrating in space proves in both branches. Their stipulated smooth periodic fields make these finite integrals legitimate, as also assured by their contraction power balance. Consequently their all-input zero-loss case satisfies step 4.1, consistently with [L2].
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
None yet.
Sources
- Niklas Beisert, Elektrodynamik, ETH Zurich 2024 FS complete lecture script, 176 pages
- Weng Cho Chew, Theory of Microwave and Optical Waveguides, Purdue lecture notes, complete 362-page text
- Roger B. Marks and Dylan F. Williams, A General Waveguide Circuit Theory, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 97(5) (1992), pp. 533–562