How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Power-normalized scattering and passivity — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Anisotropic waves and reciprocity
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Causal oscillator media and passivity
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Coordinate and Path Transport
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Discrete de Rham complexes and edge-element foundations
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Em Elementary Mathematical Prerequisites
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Lorentz Transformations
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Material response and stationary interfaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Power-normalized scattering and passivity
- Primitives and postulates
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Divergence Theorem and Classical Stokes
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vacuum waves and polarization
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weak Derivatives and Sobolev Spaces
- Weak fields, boundary power and dissipative uniqueness
- Worldlines And Clocks
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
A closed lossless one-port has unit reflection modulus
An algebraic consequence for a closed, lossless one-channel scattering model with no unlisted output. It gives the reflected-amplitude modulus and shows that power conservation alone leaves its phase undetermined; it does not assert an experimental result or the realization of an arbitrary frequency-dependent phase law.
Example
Assume . Let be a set of admissible angular frequencies at which a closed lossless one-channel finite port model is defined, with no unlisted outgoing power. At each , assume the solution satisfies all hypotheses of Passivity gives a contractive scattering matrix: the source-free macroscopic Maxwell equations with , a smooth -periodic real solution and material states on one of the stated homogeneous finite Lorentz or Drude branches, and the stated passive-wall and outgoing-power bookkeeping. Here ; material, wall, and unlisted-output losses vanish for every input. Write the scalar scattering matrix at each frequency as . Then for each such frequency. This fixes reflected power but leaves the phase unconstrained by power conservation: any unit-modulus scalar has the same power factor. For any real-valued function , has unit modulus; when this circle-valued function is nonconstant, its phase varies. If contains two distinct frequencies, such a varying family exists: set equal to and at those two frequencies, respectively, and set elsewhere. This is an algebraic freedom allowed by the power constraint, not a claim that every such phase law is realized by a Maxwell device.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: ; one incoming and one outgoing channel; at each frequency the finite port solution satisfies the smooth periodic Maxwell and homogeneous Lorentz/Drude hypotheses of the contraction theorem with ; and material, wall, and unlisted-channel losses vanish.
is carried by the finite scattering theorem and its bounded-domain mathematical supplier. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
For complex matrices, an overline is componentwise conjugation, a superscript is ordinary transpose, is the conjugate transpose, and is the identity. In this power-normalized one-channel model, and the input and output powers are and . Under the stated smooth periodic Lorentz/Drude hypotheses, the contraction theorem gives when material, wall, and unlisted-output losses vanish for every input. Finite propagating-port scattering map Passivity gives a contractive scattering matrix
Verification
Choose any nonzero incoming amplitude . By [F1], , so . Divide by to obtain , hence .
For every , . If contains distinct , define , , and elsewhere; then takes the distinct values and , while both obey step 1.1. Thus the modulus condition leaves phase variation algebraically possible on a multi-frequency set.
A visible subblock need not be unitary
A finite-dimensional matrix example showing the distinction between the full two-channel output and a one-channel observation. The swap matrix is stipulated as a unitary scattering-data example; no particular Maxwell device realization is asserted. The zero observed output is not material absorption.
Example
Assume .
For , use the Hermitian inner product and norm . For , let , with componentwise conjugation and ordinary transpose; is unitary when , where is the identity on .
Consider the algebraic two-channel scattering matrix
The displayed matrix is unitary. Let and . A one-channel observer retains only channel 1, represented by , which satisfies and is the orthogonal projection onto . Identify its range with using the basis vector . For incident vector , where , the full output is , while the observed output is . The observed operator is represented by the one-by-one matrix , so it is not unitary even though the full two-channel map conserves power. The omitted second output accounts for the power; there is no material absorption in this example. The matrix is a consistency example, not a claim that a specified waveguide device realizes it.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the displayed two-channel matrix, and the projection retaining channel 1.
is carried by the finite scattering theorem cited for the lossless full-channel interpretation. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
For a physical finite port map satisfying the contraction theorem's exact hypotheses—a bounded port domain, , fixed , a unique solution map, smooth -periodic real Maxwell fields with , one stated homogeneous Lorentz or Drude branch, and the stated wall and outgoing-power bookkeeping—vanishing material, wall, and unlisted-output losses imply . The port model assigns power to the full amplitude vector. Finite propagating-port scattering map Passivity gives a contractive scattering matrix
Verification
The matrix is real and symmetric, so . Direct multiplication gives ; for we have and . Thus this stipulated full-channel matrix satisfies the algebraic unitary condition that [F1] gives for a physical lossless model under its separate smooth Lorentz/Drude hypotheses; no such physical realization is asserted.
Since and , the restriction sends the basis vector to ; its one-dimensional matrix is . Hence , so the observed one-channel map is not unitary.
For the chosen input, the omitted component is and has squared norm , equal to the incident power. The retained component vanishes, but the full lossless map sends all power to channel 2; therefore the vanishing observed output is not evidence of material absorption.