How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weak fields, boundary power and dissipative uniqueness
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Discrete de Rham complexes and edge-element foundations
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Em Elementary Mathematical Prerequisites
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fourier Transform Convolution and Approximate Identities
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Integral Maxwell and constraints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Lorentz Transformations
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Material response and stationary interfaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Primitives and postulates
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sard Theorem and Transversality
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Direct Method and Euler--Lagrange Equations
- The Divergence Theorem and Classical Stokes
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Volumes of Elementary Solids and Solids of Revolution
- Weak Derivatives and Sobolev Spaces
- Worldlines And Clocks
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
Finite-energy PEC and impedance boundary formulation
A conditional, local, linear, nondispersive Maxwell curl-evolution boundary model in one SI inertial laboratory frame. It includes static measurable uniformly positive coefficient fields, the constant-coefficient branch of the material-closure postulate, a closure-defined PEC boundary condition, and an impedance branch only for fields carrying L2 weak tangential traces identified by testing each bulk field against every smooth ambient test field and satisfying the additional energy-pair Green identity. The evolution class does not impose the Gauss constraints; a full Maxwell application must separately supply charge data and impose those constraints. It asserts no existence theorem, no general L2 trace theorem, no validity for any actual material, and no empirical claim.
Definition
Let be a nonempty open interval and let be a nonempty bounded Lipschitz polyhedron in the laboratory frame. Its boundary has the outward unit normal on the relative interior of each planar face; edge and vertex values will be irrelevant under the face-area convention below. Use the SI conventions of this framework. In particular has units , has units , has units , has units , and a volume current density has units .
For the boundary integrals, let be the finite family of relative interiors of the planar two-dimensional faces of . Write for Lebesgue measure on , defined as the restriction of Lebesgue outer measure to its Carath'eodory-measurable sets; under the assumed , this is a complete measure. For each face , let be its supporting plane and fix a Euclidean isometry . For every Borel set (a set in the sigma-algebra generated by the open subsets of ), define . Any two choices of differ by an affine Euclidean isometry of with absolute Jacobian determinant , so the Borel change-of-variables formula makes independent of that choice. Each face is bounded and lies in a finite rectangle in its plane, so . Set on . The edges and vertices have -measure zero and are omitted, so is the outward face normal -almost everywhere; its values on edges and vertices do not affect any boundary expression. Since is finite and Lebesgue measure restricted to is sigma-finite, is the unique sigma-finite product measure on , with rectangle values for Borel and Lebesgue-measurable . All boundary and spaces and almost-everywhere statements use these measures.
Every cross product in the boundary formulas is the right-handed Euclidean cross product in the positively oriented orthonormal frame basis: for and , , as in the cross-product definition of this library.
For a real vector field , its distributional curl is the distribution defined by
As in the real graph space definition of the imported mathematical library, consists of the vector fields whose distributional curl is represented by an vector field, with norm
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice as carried by that imported weak-derivative convention. Let be measurable, essentially bounded, real symmetric coefficient fields, independent of time. Require constants and such that, for almost every and every ,
The coefficient units are and , respectively. They define bounded symmetric multiplication operators on . Define and . The spatially varying coefficient fields are explicit local model data; they are not inferred from the homogeneous material-closure postulate. Its constant symmetric branch is a special case.
A field is in when it has a derivative in the norm at every and that derivative is norm-continuous. means norm-continuity into the graph space. A finite-energy model solution is a pair
with , satisfying the adopted evolution equations as identities for each ,
This class specifies the Maxwell curl-evolution subsystem independently of charge data. In the volume-charge case, a full Maxwell application additionally supplies a charge density for every , in , and imposes the Gauss constraints: for every and every scalar test ,
These additional constraints are not part of the evolution class defined here and are not inferred from its two curl equations. Energy identities for this class also apply to its Gauss-constrained subclass; they do not establish the constraints or the physical applicability of either class.
Its stored field energy is the finite real number
There are two alternative boundary models.
PEC. Perfect electric conductor means for every , where is exactly the closure of in the displayed graph norm. This closure definition is used; it is not replaced by an unproved identification with every possible trace kernel.
Impedance. For , an weak tangential trace is a field with almost everywhere such that
Here a test field is a smooth map on all of with compact support, and is its ordinary restriction. In particular, tests may be nonzero on the boundary. This identity identifies the boundary field through independently chosen tests; the single energy-pair identity below does not replace it.
A Green-compatible tangential boundary pair for consists of measurable fields such that, outside a single set of times of Lebesgue measure zero, and are weak tangential traces of and , respectively, in the displayed sense, and additionally
The energy-pair Green identity is retained as an explicit admissibility requirement; no extension from smooth tests to the rough fields themselves is assumed without it. Membership in alone does not assert that such an trace pair exists. Let be a time-independent scalar surface admittance, in siemens, with almost everywhere. The impedance law is
Then and is the nonnegative outward boundary-power density in . No pointwise boundary value or existence of an weak tangential trace for an arbitrary field is asserted.
Definition references
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Lebesgue measurable sets, the family , and the restricted set function
Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields
The product measure of two sigma-finite measure spaces
Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values
The real H(curl) graph space on a polyhedron
Zero tangential trace H(curl) space
Borel change of variables from the compact-support formula and Radon uniqueness
Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch
Weak surface divergence of a tangential field
Definition
Assume the surface-measure convention with of the mathematical definition of the stationary surface distribution. Let be a compact embedded hypersurface without manifold boundary, with a chosen continuous unit normal and its finite surface measure . At , define the tangent plane
For , meaning that its composition with each local surface chart is , its surface gradient is the unique vector satisfying
where is the derivative of in tangent directions. For a measurable tangential field with , define its weak surface divergence as the linear functional on
This functional is well-defined because is compact, is continuous and bounded, and is integrable. If it has a continuous density , meaning
then is called a continuous representative of the weak surface divergence. The definition itself does not assert that such a representative exists or is unique; a result using pointwise must establish both.
Energy balance and zero-data forward uniqueness for admissible weak Maxwell fields
An a-priori energy identity and homogeneous zero-data forward uniqueness for the explicitly defined finite-energy Maxwell curl-evolution model with bounded static symmetric uniformly positive coefficients. The identity applies to the closure-defined PEC branch or to the impedance branch only when its Green-compatible L2 tangential boundary pair exists. Two-solution uniqueness follows in the PEC branch, or in the impedance branch when the difference has a Green-compatible boundary pair. No Gauss constraint is inferred. It establishes no existence theorem, no general trace regularity, no conservation without the stated work and boundary terms, and no empirical claim.
Statement
Use the finite-energy boundary model defined earlier on the nonempty open time interval and bounded Lipschitz polyhedron . Thus are time-independent real symmetric essentially bounded coefficient fields with uniform positive lower bounds, , , and
hold as identities for every . Define
For every in , the closure-defined PEC branch satisfies
For the Green-compatible impedance branch, where , it satisfies
Here and the Green identity are exactly the boundary data and admissibility condition in the model definition; no trace is inferred from H(curl) membership alone. The work density has SI units ; the boundary term has units per unit area and is nonnegative in the impedance branch. If and in , the only admissible solution is zero for . For two solutions with the same coefficients, current and initial data, forward equality follows in the PEC branch. In the impedance branch it follows if the difference fields, with the difference boundary pair and the same , also satisfy the model's Green compatibility identity. This difference-pair identity is an explicit hypothesis here; no inference from the two separate energy-pair identities alone is used. These conclusions concern the curl-evolution class and infer no Gauss constraint. Uniqueness is forward from the specified initial time; no backward uniqueness is asserted for a dissipative boundary.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the coefficient fields and their uniform positive bounds, the time regularity of , the two evolution identities, and either the PEC closure condition or the impedance trace pair and Green identity of the Statement.
The finite-energy boundary model defines the real H(curl) fields, the closure-defined PEC space, the bounded static coefficient maps, the time regularity, the impedance boundary pair, its Green compatibility identity, and the PDEs used here. The variable-coefficient branch is explicit model data; the earlier homogeneous material postulate supplies only its constant-coefficient special case. Finite-energy PEC and impedance boundary formulation
consists of real vector fields whose distributional curl is represented by an vector field, with the graph norm . The real H(curl) graph space on a polyhedron
is the graph-norm closure of ; the closure definition does not assert equality with the kernel of an arbitrary boundary trace map. Zero tangential trace H(curl) space
The real vector-valued pairing is and , as in the graph-space convention. For each component, the scalar supplier gives . Put and . If , then ; otherwise, nonnegativity of for gives . Therefore . The real H(curl) graph space on a polyhedron Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for
The boundary cross product uses the right-handed coordinate formula in [A1]. If and , substituting that formula twice gives .
Countable Choice permits selection of one smooth compactly supported graph-norm approximant at each accuracy ; only this countable family is selected in the PEC argument. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Proof
The coefficient fields define bounded symmetric multiplication operators on , so is finite. For a real Hilbert-space vector and a bounded symmetric operator , expand in the norm in . Bilinearity and symmetry give Applying this calculation to and yields .
Substitute the two evolution identities from [A1] into the derivative of step 1.1 and use symmetry of the real pairing: All three pairings are finite by the H(curl) and hypotheses and [F3].
In the PEC branch, [F2] and [A2] provide with and in . For every , the distributional-curl definition in [F1], tested against , gives . By [F3], the left side converges to and the right side to . Hence the first and third terms in step 2.1 cancel, and .
In the impedance branch, the Green compatibility identity in [A1] gives . The boundary law and imply since [F4] gives and . Substitution in step 2.1 gives for almost every ; the boundary integrand is time-integrable by the trace and bounded-Y assumptions.
In either branch, is continuously differentiable by step 1.1, the volume work is integrable, and the impedance power is integrable when present. Integrating the derivative identities of steps 3.1 or 3.2 on gives exactly the two energy balances in the Statement.
Consider a single admissible solution with and . The coefficient lower bounds give . By step 4.1, for PEC and for impedance whenever ; thus , and the lower bound gives in for every such . This proves the homogeneous zero-data conclusion. For two solutions with the same current and initial data, their difference has the required time regularity and homogeneous evolution by linearity. The PEC closure is a vector space, so their difference is PEC-admissible. In the impedance case the difference tangential pair is , tangential and satisfies the same linear boundary law. Subtracting the respective smooth-test identities shows that its two fields are weak tangential traces of the difference bulk fields outside the union of the two null sets of times. Its energy-pair Green identity is additionally assumed here, as in the Statement. Under that assumption step 4.1 applies to the difference and proves equality forward in time. No existence is asserted.
Continuous density of the weak surface divergence for a C1 tangent field
Statement
Assume . Let be a compact embedded hypersurface without manifold boundary, with surface measure and a chosen unit normal. Let be a tangential vector field on , meaning that its two coordinate components in every surface chart are . Then the weak surface divergence defined earlier has a unique continuous density such that
In a chart , write and let be its surface-area density. The representative satisfies
This unique continuous representative is denoted .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the surface , its surface measure, the tangential field , and the definition of .
A compact embedded hypersurface has finitely many regular charts covering it, the surface measure is finite and independent of the chosen charts, and each chart area density is positive and . Surface distributions and interfacial jumps Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces Chart and partition independence of surface measure
The tangent plane has the Euclidean inner product; the coordinate tangent vectors are linearly independent. The Euclidean inner product on Surface distributions and interfacial jumps
Compactly supported functions in a coordinate chart satisfy ordinary integration by parts on a rectangle containing their support, with iterated integrals justified by Fubini. If are differentiable on with integrable, then Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
If a compact set lies in an open set of Euclidean space, there is a smooth compactly supported cutoff in that open set, with values in , equal to one on a neighborhood of the compact set. Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization
A continuous density on whose pairing with every ambient smooth compactly supported test vanishes is zero pointwise. Surface densities with vanishing test pairings vanish
Proof
Fix a chart . Its coordinate tangent vectors are independent by [F2], so there are unique functions with ; their regularity is part of the stated tangent-field convention. The chart area density is positive and by [F1]. Therefore is continuous on the chart.
Let have compact support in this chart. By the definition of the surface gradient, . The surface-area formula and [F3] give Here the repeated is summed over ; compact support lets each product extend by zero as a function, and integration by parts on a rectangle containing the support has no boundary term. Thus from step 1.1 represents on this chart.
If is empty, the unique empty function is the asserted density and every chart assertion is vacuous; hence assume is nonempty. Write the finite chart cover in [F1] as , with open and the corresponding chart image. All balls with and for some cover . Take a finite subcover, assign a chart to each of its finitely many balls, and apply [F4] to each closed inner ball in its assigned . This gives finitely many nonnegative ambient cutoffs; group their sums as by chart and put . Then on a neighborhood of , and there restricts to a function, with support compactly contained in its chart, such that . Each extends continuously by zero off its chart, so is continuous on . For every , applying step 2.1 to and summing gives , because . Thus represents . The construction makes only finitely many choices.
Fix any chart image and . By [F4], choose equal to one near . The function on , extended by zero to , is continuous on , since its support is compactly contained in . For every ambient test , the restriction of has compact support in . Steps 2.1 and 3.1 therefore give . By [F5], on , and gives . Since the chart and point were arbitrary, the global density has the stated formula in every chart.
If are continuous representatives, then for every , hence for every restriction of an ambient test in . Applying [F5] to gives pointwise equality. Together with step 4.1 this proves uniqueness and chart independence of the asserted continuous representative.
Stationary sheets and charge conservation
A conditional stationary-interface result for the distributional macroscopic Maxwell equations with locally integrable volume sources and a C1 free surface-charge/tangential-current sheet. It supplies the four jump laws and the compatible surface charge balance, and identifies the adopted vacuum stationary-sheet model as a special case. The interface is fixed and has no edge; no moving sheets, point-source collisions with the interface, existence theorem, constitutive inference or empirical claim is included.
Statement
Assume . Let be a laboratory region, where is a nonempty open interval and is open. Use the field and SI conventions of The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields, Polarization, magnetization, bound and free sources, and the fields D and H, and Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values: is measured in , in tesla, in , and in . Let be a fixed compact two-sided embedded hypersurface without manifold boundary, with unit normal pointing from the minus side to the plus side ; write . Let be locally integrable fields with the joint one-sided spacetime extensions on the two sides used in the stationary-interface theorem. Let the volume charge and volume current be locally integrable and on each side with joint one-sided extensions to . Let and be , with . Their SI units are for , for , for , and for .
Assume the distributional macroscopic equations with the stationary sheet source pair , :
on . This is the thin-interface solution assumption of the adopted macroscopic model; it is not inferred from the smooth equations.
Then pointwise on ,
and
Here is the weak surface divergence of Weak surface divergence of a tangential field. The proof uses Continuous density of the weak surface divergence for a C1 tangent field to identify its unique continuous density for the stated current; denotes that density. The sign of uses for the chosen normal. In the stationary-sheet vacuum model, if there is no point-source component in the interface neighbourhood and , the adopted distributional vacuum Maxwell equations supply the displayed macroscopic equations, so this theorem applies there as well.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The interface, fields, sources, regularity, units, , and the distributional macroscopic equations of the Statement.
The four displayed distributional macroscopic equations with volume sources and the sheet pair are the thin-interface solution hypothesis adopted here; they are assumed, not derived from the smooth equations. The published Statement of Stationary macroscopic interface jump conditions for D, B, E and H uses the same equation forms but requires its sheet densities to be stationary in . Its Statement is therefore not invoked verbatim for the time-dependent densities of this item; the proof-level extension used for the four spatial jumps is justified in step 2.1.
For the vacuum specialization only, the adopted distributional vacuum postulate requires , , , and in for the declared stationary-sheet source model. Distributional vacuum Maxwell equations for the declared point and stationary-sheet sources
The stationary sheet pairings are and , with fixed, directed from minus to plus, and . Distributional Maxwell equations with point and stationary-sheet sources
The surface distribution is , and the jump convention is for the same normal orientation. Surface distributions and interfacial jumps
For a piecewise volume current with the stated one-sided traces, its distributional divergence is . Distributional divergence and curl across a stationary interface
The weak surface divergence is defined by for scalar tests on ; it is a continuous-density divergence only after that representation is proved. Weak surface divergence of a tangential field
For every tangential field on the compact surface, the weak surface divergence has a unique continuous density, represented in a chart by . Continuous density of the weak surface divergence for a C1 tangent field
If a continuous density on a compact embedded hypersurface pairs to zero against every ambient smooth compactly supported test, then the density is pointwise zero; this statement assumes . Surface densities with vanishing test pairings vanish
Distributional derivatives are linear and commute, and for compactly supported smooth tests. Distribution Distributional derivative Distributional differentiation is continuous and commutes
The SI constants satisfy , with . Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values
A locally integrable function whose regular distribution vanishes is zero almost everywhere; the compact embedded hypersurface is null for three-dimensional Lebesgue measure because it is the image of a two-dimensional manifold in . Locally integrable functions embed in distributions The image of a lower-dimensional manifold is null
A compactly supported temporal test permits ordinary integration by parts on with no endpoint term. If are differentiable on with integrable, then
A jointly continuous function on a compact surface times a compact time interval is uniformly bounded there, so dominated convergence makes its surface integral against a fixed continuous test continuous in time. Dominated convergence
The notation on means the product of the finite Borel surface measure of the compact embedded hypersurface and Lebesgue measure on . For compactly supported continuous integrands, the surface-time integral is finite and agrees with the iterated integral by Fubini. Surface distributions and interfacial jumps Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
Proof
By [A1], and hold in distributions. For any vector distribution , the coordinate expression for is because distributional partial derivatives commute by [F6], so the terms cancel in pairs. Taking the divergence of the first equation and substituting the second gives the distributional source-compatibility identity
Let and choose a compact interval containing its time support in its interior. The function is on the compact set . Its time difference quotients converge uniformly in on compact subintervals to , by uniform continuity of ; since has finite surface measure, is and . Also vanishes near the endpoints of . Using the surface-sheet pairing and one-dimensional integration by parts [F9], Hence , with no transport term because is fixed.
For any locally integrable scalar or vector field that is on the two fixed sides of and has the stated joint one-sided extensions, its distributional time derivative is the regular distribution of its sidewise classical derivative. Indeed, on a compact spacetime cylinder, almost everywhere because is three-dimensionally null by [F8]. Pairing with a compactly supported test , Fubini gives . For almost every fixed , one-dimensional integration by parts in has no endpoint term because is compactly supported in ; the joint one-sided extensions make the sidewise derivatives locally bounded near , and ordinary regularity gives local integrability away from . Fubini therefore gives . For complex-valued tests the same calculation is applied to real and imaginary parts. The indicators of the two sides are independent of time, so no spatial-interface delta occurs. This applies componentwise to , and .
The four spatial jumps follow from the proof argument of [A1], not by identifying its narrower published Statement with the present hypotheses. That supplier's proof applies the spatial divergence/curl jump formulas at each time, compares the volume and surface coefficients, and then localizes the continuous surface coefficients. These steps use that is fixed, that have the stated joint one-sided extensions, and that the sheet densities are continuous; they do not differentiate or in time. Here are jointly , hence continuous and locally integrable on ; step 1.3 supplies the same regular time-derivative premise for . Fubini on compactly supported spacetime tests is justified by [F12]. Thus the proof-level jump argument applies to this time-dependent data, giving , , , and as surface-distribution identities. Their coefficients are continuous on , so the supplier's coefficient localization gives the stated pointwise identities. This is the broader consequence of its proof, not its published Statement.
The volume-current jump formula [F3] gives . For the sheet current, pair its distributional divergence with a test : by the distributional derivative definition and , The surface divergence here is the functional of [F4]; the identity uses only that is tangential and the interface has no edge. Substitution into step 1.1 yields
By step 1.3, is the regular distribution of a locally integrable sidewise derivative and has no term; the other volume coefficient is locally integrable by the one-sided hypotheses. In every open subset disjoint from , the last two terms of step 2.2 vanish, so pairs to zero against every compactly supported test there. By [F8] it vanishes almost everywhere on ; because [F8] also gives that is three-dimensionally null, the coefficient vanishes almost everywhere on all of . Removing its regular distribution from step 2.2 leaves as a surface distribution.
For each , the field is a tangential field on the compact surface, so [F11] supplies its unique continuous weak-divergence density. In each chart this density is ; since is jointly and is positive and , the chart formula is jointly continuous in . Uniqueness makes these local formulas agree on overlaps. Write this joint continuous function as . The definition [F4], integrated against temporal tests, then identifies the surface functional in step 3.1 with the spacetime distribution .
Put , which is continuous on by the stated joint regularity and step 4.1. The surface-distribution identity in step 3.1 says that for every real ambient spatial test and real temporal test , For fixed , the real inner pairing is continuous in by [F10]. If , continuity gives with on which has the same strict sign as . Define for and otherwise. This is a nonnegative smooth compactly supported temporal test, positive on that interval, so has the same strict sign as , contradicting the displayed identity. Thus for every . Fixing any and applying [F5] to the continuous density shows at every .
For the vacuum specialization, put and . By [A2], , , and ; also in distributions by [F7]. Thus the adopted vacuum stationary-sheet model supplies the thin-interface solution hypothesis [A1] with and in the interface neighbourhood, so the preceding steps apply. This is a model specialization, not a derivation of the vacuum postulate.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
None yet.