Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous density of the weak surface divergence for a C1 tangent field

Statement

Assume ACω. Let S⊂R3 be a compact embedded C2 hypersurface without manifold boundary, with surface measure dS and a chosen unit normal. Let K be a C1 tangential vector field on S, meaning that its two coordinate components in every C2 surface chart are C1. Then the weak surface divergence Div⁡SK defined earlier has a unique continuous density g:S→R such that

⟨Div⁡SK,ϕ⟩=∫Sgϕ dSfor every ϕ∈C1(S).

In a chart X:V⊆R2→S, write K=K1∂1X+K2∂2X and let JX=det⁡(∂aX⋅∂bX)a,b=12 be its surface-area density. The representative satisfies

g(X(u))=JX(u)−1∑a=12∂a(JX(u)Ka(u)).

This unique continuous representative is denoted div⁡SK.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, the surface S, its surface measure, the tangential C1 field K, and the definition of Div⁡SK.

[F1]

A compact embedded C2 hypersurface has finitely many regular C2 charts covering it, the surface measure is finite and independent of the chosen charts, and each chart area density JX is positive and C1. Surface distributions and interfacial jumps Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces Chart and partition independence of surface measure

[F2]

The tangent plane has the Euclidean inner product; the coordinate tangent vectors ∂1X,∂2X are linearly independent. The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn Surface distributions and interfacial jumps

[F3]

Compactly supported C1 functions in a coordinate chart satisfy ordinary integration by parts on a rectangle containing their support, with iterated integrals justified by Fubini. If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product

[F4]

If a compact set lies in an open set of Euclidean space, there is a smooth compactly supported cutoff in that open set, with values in [0,1], equal to one on a neighborhood of the compact set. Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization

[F5]

A continuous density on S whose pairing with every ambient smooth compactly supported test vanishes is zero pointwise. Surface densities with vanishing test pairings vanish

Proof

technique · compute the weak divergence in one chart, patch the local continuous densities with a finite partition of unity, and use surface-density localization for uniqueness
1.1F1F2givenalgebra

Fix a chart X:V→S. Its coordinate tangent vectors are independent by [F2], so there are unique functions Ka with K=Ka∂aX; their C1 regularity is part of the stated tangent-field convention. The chart area density JX is positive and C1 by [F1]. Therefore gX(X(u)):=JX(u)−1∑a=12∂a(JXKa)(u) is continuous on the chart.

2.1step 1.1F1F3givenalgebra

Let ϕ∈C1(S) have compact support in this chart. By the definition of the surface gradient, K⋅∇Sϕ=Ka∂a(ϕ∘X). The surface-area formula and [F3] give −∫SK⋅∇Sϕ dS=−∫VJXKa∂a(ϕ∘X) du=∫V∂a(JXKa)(ϕ∘X) du=∫SgXϕ dS. Here the repeated a is summed over 1,2; compact support lets each product JXKa(ϕ∘X) extend by zero as a C1 function, and integration by parts on a rectangle containing the support has no boundary term. Thus gX from step 1.1 represents Div⁡SK on this chart.

3.1F1F4step 2.1givenalgebra

If S is empty, the unique empty function is the asserted density and every chart assertion is vacuous; hence assume S is nonempty. Write the finite chart cover in [F1] as S∩Oj, with Oj⊂R3 open and S∩Oj the corresponding chart image. All balls B(x,r) with x∈S and B‾(x,2r)⊂Oj for some j cover S. Take a finite subcover, assign a chart to each of its finitely many balls, and apply [F4] to each closed inner ball in its assigned Oj. This gives finitely many nonnegative ambient cutoffs; group their sums as bj by chart and put b=∑jbj. Then b>0 on a neighborhood of S, and χj=bj/b there restricts to a C1(S) function, with support compactly contained in its chart, such that ∑jχj=1. Each χjgj extends continuously by zero off its chart, so g:=∑jχjgj is continuous on S. For every ϕ∈C1(S), applying step 2.1 to χjϕ and summing gives ∫Sgϕ dS=−∑j∫SK⋅∇S(χjϕ) dS=−∫SK⋅∇Sϕ dS, because ∑j∇Sχj=0. Thus g represents Div⁡SK. The construction makes only finitely many choices.

4.1F4F5step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Fix any chart image U=S∩O and x∈U. By [F4], choose η∈Cc∞(O) equal to one near x. The function h=η(gX−g) on U, extended by zero to S∖U, is continuous on S, since its support is compactly contained in U. For every ambient test ψ∈Cc∞(R3), the restriction of ηψ has compact support in U. Steps 2.1 and 3.1 therefore give ∫Shψ dS=∫U(gX−g)ηψ dS=0. By [F5], h=0 on S, and η(x)=1 gives gX(x)=g(x). Since the chart and point were arbitrary, the global density has the stated formula in every chart.

5.1F5step 3.1step 4.1givenalgebra∎

If g1,g2 are continuous representatives, then ∫S(g1−g2)ϕ dS=0 for every ϕ∈C1(S), hence for every restriction of an ambient test in Cc∞(R3). Applying [F5] to g1−g2 gives pointwise equality. Together with step 4.1 this proves uniqueness and chart independence of the asserted continuous representative.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources