Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reciprocal port normalization gives symmetric scattering

Physical scope

A conditional fixed-frequency consequence for the reciprocal phasor model on a bounded C1 device with the reciprocal port-pairing convention of emx-port-scattering-model. It uses ordinary transpose for reciprocity and a separate Hermitian power pairing for energy. The symmetric-unitary conclusion requires zero operational net cycle-averaged material transfer, passive-wall outward power, and unlisted outgoing power for every input of the same port map. Smooth periodic finite Lorentz and Drude branches with matching harmonic coefficients and zero branch losses remain explicit sufficient cases. It asserts no time-reversal theorem, local passivity for arbitrary coefficients, existence of a scattering solution, or empirical realization.

Statement

Assume ACω and the finite port model at a fixed real ω>0. Let S(ω)∈CN×N be its unique scattering matrix. Suppose the continuous device phasor coefficient maps ε,μ:Ω‾→C3×3 obey ε(x)T=ε(x) and μ(x)T=μ(x) pointwise, and for every pair of incoming vectors the corresponding source-free scattering solutions lie in C1(Ω‾;C3) and have reciprocal port modes satisfying the exact bilinear pairing stipulated in the model definition. Then

S(ω)T=S(ω).

For A∈CN×N, define its conjugate transpose by A†:=A‾ T, where the overline is componentwise conjugation and a superscript T is ordinary transpose; A is Hermitian when A†=A and unitary when A†A=AA†=IN, with IN the identity on CN. The transpose relation above uses the unconjugated Lorentz pairing; the unitary relation below uses the separate conjugated Hermitian power pairing. No time-reversal claim follows.

For each incoming vector a, define the operational net cycle-averaged material power transferred from the fields in this source-free phasor model by

Pbulk(a):=ω2∫ΩIm⁡(E~†εE~+H~†μH~) dV.

Here v†=v‾ T for a complex column vector, and this power has units W. It is a signed net transfer, not an assumption of local passivity or a definition of a material realization. Let P∂(a) and Pother(a) be the nonnegative outward wall and unlisted-channel powers of the same finite-port model, whose total outward boundary power is ∥Sa∥22−∥a∥22+P∂(a)+Pother(a). Then

∥a∥22−∥Sa∥22=Pbulk(a)+P∂(a)+Pother(a).

Consequently, if all three powers vanish for every incoming vector a∈CN, then S†S=SS†=IN, so S is symmetric and unitary. Pointwise Hermitian ε and μ suffice to make Pbulk(a)=0 for every input, since their quadratic forms are real; Hermitian symmetry is distinct from the ordinary transpose symmetry required for reciprocity. No constitutive branch beyond the stated phasor model is required for this operational zero-power conclusion.

The following full finite-port contraction hypotheses give additional Lorentz and Drude sufficient cases on this same port map. For every incoming vector, its real field maps E,H,D,B:Ω‾×R→R3 and its material-state maps on that domain are jointly C∞ and T-periodic, where T=2π/ω, and satisfy the smooth source-free macroscopic Maxwell equations with ρf=Jf=0.

The material closure is one of these two homogeneous, constant-coefficient branches. In the finite Lorentz branch, choose finite M≥1 and maps Pℓ:Ω‾×R→R3 for 1≤ℓ≤M. They satisfy

D=ε∞E+∑ℓ=1MPℓ,B=μH,∂t2Pℓ+γℓ∂tPℓ+ωℓ2Pℓ=aℓE,

with constant ε∞,μ,aℓ,ωℓ>0 and γℓ≥0. In the Drude branch, take maps P,V:Ω‾×R→R3. They satisfy

D=ε∞E+P,B=μH,∂tP=V,∂tV+γV=aE,

with constant ε∞,μ,a>0 and γ≥0. Their SI units are those specified in the finite-port contraction model.

For each input, require the real fields and material states to have only this frequency: let E~,H~,D~,B~:Ω‾→C3 be their phasor amplitudes with E(x,t)=Re⁡(E~(x)e−iωt), and analogously for H,D,B. In the Lorentz branch also write Pℓ(x,t)=Re⁡(P~ℓ(x)e−iωt) with P~ℓ:Ω‾→C3; in the Drude branch write P,V in the same form with amplitudes P~,V~:Ω‾→C3. Substitution into the closure equations gives

εL(ω)=(ε∞+∑ℓ=1Maℓωℓ2−ω2−iγℓω)I3,εD(ω)=(ε∞−aω2+iγω)I3,

where every Lorentz denominator is required nonzero, I3 is the 3×3 identity, and the magnetic coefficient is μI3 in either branch. Require these harmonic coefficient maps to be the continuous coefficients of this same reciprocal-phasor port model. The matrices are symmetric under ordinary transpose. The branch loss density is ℓ=∑j=1M(γj/aj)∣∂tPj∣2 in the Lorentz branch and ℓ=(γ/a)∣V∣2 in the Drude branch, using the real vector norm ∣v∣2=v⋅v. For the solution with incoming vector a, define Pmat(a):=T−1∫0T∫Ωℓ dV dt, and let P∂(a) and Pother(a) be its nonnegative passive-wall and unlisted-outgoing powers under the finite-port model's bookkeeping. The field, material-state, and parameter units are exactly those specified in that model.

In either harmonic branch, Pbulk(a)=Pmat(a). Thus Pmat(a)=P∂(a)=Pother(a)=0 for every incoming vector a is a sufficient case of the operational zero-power criterion, also supplied by the contraction result. These branch hypotheses are sufficient cases, not restrictions on the general phasor power identity above.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a unique finite scattering matrix S, two source-free C1 phasor solutions in the same reciprocal device, and reciprocal incoming/outgoing mode phases satisfying the bilinear pairing in the definition.

[A1]

ACω is the countable-choice axiom required by the bounded-domain reciprocity supplier. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

The reciprocal port convention is ∫∂Ωn⋅(E~1×H~2−E~2×H~1) dS=a1Tb2−b1Ta2; the products are complex-bilinear and contain no conjugation. Finite propagating-port scattering map

[L1]

For C1 phasor solutions on a bounded C1 domain, common continuous coefficients with ordinary transpose symmetry and ACω, the source-free Lorentz boundary pairing is zero. The identity does not assume Hermitian coefficients or losslessness. Reciprocity in reciprocal linear media

[L2]

Under the additional smooth T-periodic, source-free field assumptions, the finite homogeneous Lorentz or Drude closure equations, and the branchwise loss and port bookkeeping stated for the unitary conclusion above, the contraction theorem gives S†S=IN when Pmat(a)=P∂(a)=Pother(a)=0 for every input a. Passivity gives a contractive scattering matrix

[F2]

For real C1 vector fields F,G on an open subset of R3, div⁡(F×G)=G⋅curl⁡F−F⋅curl⁡G. The complex-bilinear version follows by expanding real and imaginary parts. The divergence and curl of a cross product

[F3]

Under ACω, on a bounded C1 domain Ω⊂R3, each real C1(Ω‾) vector field has finite volume-divergence and boundary-flux integrals, and these integrals agree. Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain

Proof

technique · apply the source-free Lorentz identity to two independently chosen incoming vectors, rewrite its boundary term with the reciprocal port pairing, and test the resulting bilinear matrix identity on coordinate vectors
1.1givenA1L1

Choose arbitrary a1,a2∈CN, and let (E~j,H~j) be their unique source-free scattering solutions. The coefficient transpose equalities and the hypotheses in [L1] imply ∫∂Ωn⋅(E~1×H~2−E~2×H~1) dS=0.

1.2givenA1F1F2F3algebra

For any input a, abbreviate its phasors by e=E~ and h=H~. The source-free equations are curl⁡e=iωμh and curl⁡h=−iωεe. Expanding [F2] into real and imaginary parts and then substituting these equations gives div⁡(e×h‾)=iω(h†μh−e†εe‾). Therefore the real C1 field Π=12Re⁡(e×h‾) satisfies div⁡Π=−ω2Im⁡(h†μh+e†εe). The bounded C1 domain and field regularity required by [F3] are precisely those in the port model. Its finite-integral conclusion applies to this identity and yields ∫∂Ωn⋅Π dS=−Pbulk(a). Substituting the model's outward-power convention proves ∥a∥22−∥Sa∥22=Pbulk(a)+P∂(a)+Pother(a), with no unlisted incoming term.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

Substitute [F1] and bj=Saj into step 1.1. Since (Sa1)T=a1TST, the result is a1T(S−ST)a2=0 for every a1,a2∈CN.

3.1step 2.1algebra

For any coordinate vectors ej,ek, step 2.1 gives ejT(S−ST)ek=Sjk−Skj=0. This holds for every pair j,k, hence every entry of S−ST is zero and ST=S. No complex conjugation is introduced.

4.1givenstep 3.1step 1.2algebra

If these three powers vanish for every a, step 1.2 gives a†Qa=0 for every a, where Q=IN−S†S is Hermitian. Taking a=ej gives Qjj=0. For j≠k, taking a=ej+ek and a=ej+iek gives respectively 2Re⁡Qjk=0 and −2Im⁡Qjk=0, so Q=0. Thus S†S=IN. Its N columns are orthonormal and hence linearly independent; in the N-dimensional space they form a basis. For x=Sy this gives SS†x=SS†Sy=Sy=x, so also SS†=IN. Combining with step 3.1 proves the symmetric-unitary conclusion. For Hermitian coefficients, e†εe‾=e†ε†e=e†εe and likewise for h, so their imaginary parts and Pbulk vanish. No time-reversal conclusion is used.

5.1givenL2step 4.1algebra∎

In the stated Lorentz sufficient case, set dj=ωj2−ω2−iγjω≠0; the harmonic closure gives P~j=aje/dj. Hence Im⁡(e†εLe)=∑jajγjω∣e∣2/∣dj∣2, while the magnetic quadratic form is real. Direct averaging of the real sinusoid gives T−1∫0T∣∂tPj∣2dt=ω2∣P~j∣2/2. Thus its loss density average equals ω2Im⁡(e†εLe). For the Drude case, V~=ae/(γ−iω) gives T−1∫0T∣V∣2dt=a2∣e∣2/[2(γ2+ω2)], and Im⁡(e†εDe)=aγ∣e∣2/[ω(γ2+ω2)]. Multiplication by γ/a gives the same equality with ω/2 times this imaginary part. The formulas remain valid at zero damping, and the Lorentz nonzero-denominator condition is retained. Integrating in space proves Pmat=Pbulk in both branches. Their stipulated smooth periodic fields make these finite integrals legitimate, as also assured by their contraction power balance. Consequently their all-input zero-loss case satisfies step 4.1, consistently with [L2].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources