How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Reciprocal port normalization gives symmetric scattering
A conditional fixed-frequency consequence for the reciprocal phasor model on a bounded C1 device with the reciprocal port-pairing convention of emx-port-scattering-model. It uses ordinary transpose for reciprocity and a separate Hermitian power pairing for energy. The symmetric-unitary conclusion requires zero operational net cycle-averaged material transfer, passive-wall outward power, and unlisted outgoing power for every input of the same port map. Smooth periodic finite Lorentz and Drude branches with matching harmonic coefficients and zero branch losses remain explicit sufficient cases. It asserts no time-reversal theorem, local passivity for arbitrary coefficients, existence of a scattering solution, or empirical realization.
Statement
Assume and the finite port model at a fixed real . Let be its unique scattering matrix. Suppose the continuous device phasor coefficient maps obey and pointwise, and for every pair of incoming vectors the corresponding source-free scattering solutions lie in and have reciprocal port modes satisfying the exact bilinear pairing stipulated in the model definition. Then
For , define its conjugate transpose by , where the overline is componentwise conjugation and a superscript is ordinary transpose; is Hermitian when and unitary when , with the identity on . The transpose relation above uses the unconjugated Lorentz pairing; the unitary relation below uses the separate conjugated Hermitian power pairing. No time-reversal claim follows.
For each incoming vector , define the operational net cycle-averaged material power transferred from the fields in this source-free phasor model by
Here for a complex column vector, and this power has units W. It is a signed net transfer, not an assumption of local passivity or a definition of a material realization. Let and be the nonnegative outward wall and unlisted-channel powers of the same finite-port model, whose total outward boundary power is . Then
Consequently, if all three powers vanish for every incoming vector , then , so is symmetric and unitary. Pointwise Hermitian and suffice to make for every input, since their quadratic forms are real; Hermitian symmetry is distinct from the ordinary transpose symmetry required for reciprocity. No constitutive branch beyond the stated phasor model is required for this operational zero-power conclusion.
The following full finite-port contraction hypotheses give additional Lorentz and Drude sufficient cases on this same port map. For every incoming vector, its real field maps and its material-state maps on that domain are jointly and -periodic, where , and satisfy the smooth source-free macroscopic Maxwell equations with .
The material closure is one of these two homogeneous, constant-coefficient branches. In the finite Lorentz branch, choose finite and maps for . They satisfy
with constant and . In the Drude branch, take maps . They satisfy
with constant and . Their SI units are those specified in the finite-port contraction model.
For each input, require the real fields and material states to have only this frequency: let be their phasor amplitudes with , and analogously for . In the Lorentz branch also write with ; in the Drude branch write in the same form with amplitudes . Substitution into the closure equations gives
where every Lorentz denominator is required nonzero, is the identity, and the magnetic coefficient is in either branch. Require these harmonic coefficient maps to be the continuous coefficients of this same reciprocal-phasor port model. The matrices are symmetric under ordinary transpose. The branch loss density is in the Lorentz branch and in the Drude branch, using the real vector norm . For the solution with incoming vector , define , and let and be its nonnegative passive-wall and unlisted-outgoing powers under the finite-port model's bookkeeping. The field, material-state, and parameter units are exactly those specified in that model.
In either harmonic branch, . Thus for every incoming vector is a sufficient case of the operational zero-power criterion, also supplied by the contraction result. These branch hypotheses are sufficient cases, not restrictions on the general phasor power identity above.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a unique finite scattering matrix , two source-free phasor solutions in the same reciprocal device, and reciprocal incoming/outgoing mode phases satisfying the bilinear pairing in the definition.
is the countable-choice axiom required by the bounded-domain reciprocity supplier. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The reciprocal port convention is ; the products are complex-bilinear and contain no conjugation. Finite propagating-port scattering map
For phasor solutions on a bounded domain, common continuous coefficients with ordinary transpose symmetry and , the source-free Lorentz boundary pairing is zero. The identity does not assume Hermitian coefficients or losslessness. Reciprocity in reciprocal linear media
Under the additional smooth -periodic, source-free field assumptions, the finite homogeneous Lorentz or Drude closure equations, and the branchwise loss and port bookkeeping stated for the unitary conclusion above, the contraction theorem gives when for every input . Passivity gives a contractive scattering matrix
For real vector fields on an open subset of , . The complex-bilinear version follows by expanding real and imaginary parts. The divergence and curl of a cross product
Under , on a bounded domain , each real vector field has finite volume-divergence and boundary-flux integrals, and these integrals agree. Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain
Proof
Choose arbitrary , and let be their unique source-free scattering solutions. The coefficient transpose equalities and the hypotheses in [L1] imply .
For any input , abbreviate its phasors by and . The source-free equations are and . Expanding [F2] into real and imaginary parts and then substituting these equations gives . Therefore the real field satisfies . The bounded domain and field regularity required by [F3] are precisely those in the port model. Its finite-integral conclusion applies to this identity and yields . Substituting the model's outward-power convention proves , with no unlisted incoming term.
Substitute [F1] and into step 1.1. Since , the result is for every .
For any coordinate vectors , step 2.1 gives . This holds for every pair , hence every entry of is zero and . No complex conjugation is introduced.
If these three powers vanish for every , step 1.2 gives for every , where is Hermitian. Taking gives . For , taking and gives respectively and , so . Thus . Its columns are orthonormal and hence linearly independent; in the -dimensional space they form a basis. For this gives , so also . Combining with step 3.1 proves the symmetric-unitary conclusion. For Hermitian coefficients, and likewise for , so their imaginary parts and vanish. No time-reversal conclusion is used.
In the stated Lorentz sufficient case, set ; the harmonic closure gives . Hence , while the magnetic quadratic form is real. Direct averaging of the real sinusoid gives . Thus its loss density average equals . For the Drude case, gives , and . Multiplication by gives the same equality with times this imaginary part. The formulas remain valid at zero damping, and the Lorentz nonzero-denominator condition is retained. Integrating in space proves in both branches. Their stipulated smooth periodic fields make these finite integrals legitimate, as also assured by their contraction power balance. Consequently their all-input zero-loss case satisfies step 4.1, consistently with [L2].
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Weng Cho Chew, Theory of Microwave and Optical Waveguides, Purdue lecture notes, complete 362-page text
- Roger B. Marks and Dylan F. Williams, A General Waveguide Circuit Theory, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 97(5) (1992), pp. 533–562
- Niklas Beisert, Elektrodynamik, ETH Zurich 2024 FS complete lecture script, 176 pages