Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The 2 pi-periodic three-torus, its normalized measure, test functions and the Sobolev spaces H^s

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) for the quotient, product-measure and integration clauses below, as in The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral.

(a) The 2 pi-periodic torus. Let T2π:=R/2πZ carry the quotient topology, and let T2π3:=T2π×T2π×T2π with the product topology; write q:R3→T2π3 for the quotient map and [x]:=(x1+2πZ,x2+2πZ,x3+2πZ). The map [0,2π)3→T2π3, x↦[x], is a bijection. The normalized product measure μ is μT⊗μT⊗μT, where μT is the normalized measure of The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral transported by t↦2πt; it is a probability measure on the Borel sets of T2π3 and ∫f dμ=(2π)−3∫[0,2π)3f∘q dλ3 for bounded measurable f (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

(b) Test functions and continuous classes. For N≥1 let C∞(T2π3;RN) be the set of maps u:T2π3→RN whose pullbacks u~:=u∘q:R3→RN are smooth; these are the smooth test functions (real-valued when N=1). Equivalently every smooth map u~:R3→RN that is 2π-periodic in each coordinate descends to the unique map u([x])=u~(x), since periodicity makes this value independent of x in its equivalence class. For an integer m≥0, define Cm(T2π3;RN) similarly by requiring u~∈Cm(R3;RN) (Cr and smooth maps between smooth manifolds), and define Dαu([x]):=Dαu~(x) for ∣α∣≤m. Derivatives of a periodic Cm map are periodic, so these values are well-defined, with ∥u∥Cm:=max⁡∣α∣≤m sup⁡x∈T2π3∣(Dαu)(x)∣, where the multi-index derivative is that of Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space.

(c) The Hilbert space L2. For N≥1 let L2(T2π3;RN) be the quotient of the set of measurable u with ∫∣u∣2 dμ<∞ by the μ-a.e. zero functions (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, The Lp norm descends to the quotient and makes Lp a normed space for 1≤p≤∞), with inner product ⟨u,v⟩2=∫u⋅v dμ and norm ∥u∥2=⟨u,u⟩21/2; it is a real Hilbert space (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space). For u∈L2(T2π3;RN) and k∈Z3 the k-th Fourier coefficient is the vector u^(k):=∫T2π3u(x) e−ik⋅x dμ(x)∈CN, where e−ik⋅x:=χ−k with χk([x]):=exp⁡(i k⋅x); here u is read through any representative. Write χk:T2π3→C, k∈Z3, for these characters; under the identification x=2πy they are the characters exp⁡(2πi k⋅y) of The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus, so (χk)k∈Z3 is an orthonormal basis of the complex space L2(T2π3;C).

(d) Weak derivatives and the periodic Sobolev spaces. For u,v∈L1(T2π3;R) and α∈N03 say that v is the weak derivative Dαu if ∫T2π3u Dαφ dμ=(−1)∣α∣∫T2π3v φ dμ for every φ∈C∞(T2π3;R), where Dαφ is the multi-index derivative of the periodic representative (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function records the Euclidean analogue). For an integer s≥0 let Hs(T2π3;RN):={u∈L2(T2π3;RN): for every ∣α∣≤s there is vα∈L2(T2π3;RN) with vα=Dαu}, the vector-valued weak derivative being componentwise, and put ∥u∥Hs:=(∑∣α∣≤s∥Dαu∥22)1/2. The classes L2⊆L1 on the probability space, so the integrals in the test identity are finite: ∣∫u Dαφ dμ∣≤∥u∥2∥Dαφ∥2 by Cauchy--Schwarz. The definition asserts neither that the weak derivative exists nor that the two norms compared in the next item are equivalent; those are proved in Periodic Fourier differentiation identity and equivalence of the derivative and Fourier-weight Sobolev norms.

(e) Conventions. O⊆Rm open, I⊆R an interval and maps F:I×T2π3×O→Rm′ are called smooth when the representative G(t,x,u):=F(t,q(x),u) is locally the restriction of a smooth Euclidean map: for every (t,x,u)∈I×R3×O there are an open neighborhood V⊆R4+m and G~∈C∞(V;Rm′) with G~=G on V∩(I×R3×O). For open I this is the ordinary Euclidean definition. For nonopen I it is the local extension convention at included endpoints, also admitting a singleton interval. On a nondegenerate interval endpoint time derivatives are the limits of interior derivatives; on a singleton no time derivative is specified without choosing an extension. Throughout this page the torus is always this 2π-periodic one; a statement "for every x" means for every point of T2π3, and "a.e." means μ-a.e.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources