Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Symbolic two-input propagation of a period–length model

Example

Consider the model function h:R2⊇U⟶R,h(T,l):=4π2lT2,U:={(T,l)∈R2:T>0}, where T represents a duration and l a length in an adopted unit convention; the definition here is purely formal and no physical model, period, length or measurement is asserted. The set U is open and convex in R2, and h is C∞ there. Fix a nominal input μ=(T0,l0)∈U with T0>0, and let (T,l):Ω→U be a square-integrable random vector with E[(T,l)]=(T0,l0),Cov⁡(T,l)=(σT2σTlσTlσl2). Then the linearization of h at μ has slope Dh(μ)=(−8π2l0T03, 4π2T02), and the propagated covariance of the linearization is the 1×1 matrix Dh(μ)Cov⁡(T,l)Dh(μ)T=64π4l02T06 σT2−64π4l0T05 σTl+16π4T04 σl2. This is a symbolic computation in a declared model; it neither supplies values for T0,l0,σT2,σTl,σl2 nor asserts that any apparatus realizes the model. A physical reading in which T is a period and l a length, and in which a pendulum protocol with a small-angle model is used to estimate a gravitational parameter, belongs to a separate physical item that states the protocol, the small-angle idealization and its remaining error; no such reading is made here.

Explicit bounded nonlinearity correction. In addition suppose X=(T,l) takes values in the open convex box UB=(T0−ρT,T0+ρT)×(l0−ρl,l0+ρl), where 0<ρT<T0 and ρl>0. The coordinates are fixed numerical coordinates (no addition of physical durations and lengths is intended). Write t−=T0−ρT, l+=∣l0∣+ρl, and Hh(T,l)=(24π2l/T4−8π2/T3−8π2/T30),B=(24π2l+/t−4)2+2(8π2/t−3)2. Then ∥Hh∥≤B on UB. For R=h(X)−h(μ)−Dh(μ)(X−μ), Mk=E∣X−μ∣k and the propagated variance s2=Dh(μ)Cov⁡(X)Dh(μ)T computed above, ∣R∣≤B2∣X−μ∣2,∣E[R]∣≤B2M2,E[R2]≤B24M4,∣Var⁡(h(X))−s2∣≤Bs2M4+B24M4.

The box makes M4≤(ρT2+ρl2)2<∞. This correction is mathematical; physical small-angle and apparatus discrepancies are additional inputs of a physical consumer.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The function h(T,l)=4π2lT−2 on the open convex set U={T>0}, a nominal input μ=(T0,l0)∈U, and a square-integrable random vector (T,l):Ω→U with mean μ and covariance matrix as displayed.

[L1]

If h:U→R is Borel measurable and totally differentiable at μ and (T,l) is square-integrable with mean μ and covariance matrix Σ, then the linearization x↦h(μ)+Dh(μ)(x−μ) has mean h(μ) and covariance matrix Dh(μ)ΣDh(μ)T. (The covariance of the linearization is AΣAT)

[L2]

The covariance matrix of a square-integrable random vector is Σij=E[(Xi−μi)(Xj−μj)] with Σ11=σT2, Σ22=σl2 and Σ12=Σ21=σTl. (Mean vector and covariance matrix of a square-integrable random vector)

[L4]

The Jacobian matrix of a totally differentiable map is the matrix of its total derivative in the standard bases, and matrix multiplication in the 1×2 and 2×2 case gives the displayed quadratic form. (The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn)

[L5]

On an open convex domain with ∥Hh∥≤B, the Taylor remainder has ∣R∣≤B∣X−μ∣2/2; its mean and mean-square obey the stated bounds, and its variance differs from the linearized variance by at most Bs2M4+B2M4/4 when M4<∞. (A uniform Hessian bound controls the second-order Taylor remainder, Mean, mean-square and covariance bounds for second-order linearization error)

[L6]

The matrix action Hv and operator norm ∥H∥ are those of A uniform Hessian bound controls the second-order Taylor remainder. For a 2×2 matrix H and vector v, applying Euclidean Cauchy–Schwarz to each row gives ∣Hv∣2≤(∑0≤i,j<2Hij2)∣v∣2, so its operator norm is at most the square root of the sum of squared entries. (The Hessian matrix and critical points of a scalar field, Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs)

[L7]

If h is continuous, it has Borel preimages of Borel sets; if every first partial derivative exists on a neighbourhood of μ and is continuous at μ, then h is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative. The Ck convention is continuity of the iterated coordinate derivatives through order k. (A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets, If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms)

Verification

technique · direct computation
1.1givenL3L4L7

The formula h(T,l)=4π2lT−2 is continuous on U={T>0}, and its first partial derivatives in [L3] are continuous there. Thus h is Borel measurable by [L7], and [L7] gives total differentiability at μ with Jacobian matrix Dh(μ)=(−8π2l0T0−3, 4π2T0−2); its entries agree with the partial derivatives of [L3] by [L4].

1.2givenL3L6L8algebra

Differentiating [L3] once more gives hTT=24π2l/T4, hTl=hlT=−8π2/T3 and hll=0, hence the displayed Hessian by [L6]. On UB, T>t−>0 and ∣l∣<l+; the sum of squared entries is at most (24π2l+/t−4)2+2(8π2/t−3)2, so [L6] gives ∥Hh∥≤B. The formulas of [L8] verify continuity of every iterated partial derivative on U, as asserted in the Example.

2.1step 1.1L1L2algebra

By [L1] and [L2] the propagated covariance is the single entry ∑k,l=12a1ka1lΣkl with a11=−8π2l0T0−3, a12=4π2T0−2, Σ11=σT2, Σ22=σl2 and Σ12=Σ21=σTl: a112σT2+2a11a12σTl+a122σl2=64π4l02T06σT2−64π4l0T05σTl+16π4T04σl2.

2.2givenstep 1.2L5algebra

Under the additional box hypothesis, ∣X−μ∣2<ρT2+ρl2 pointwise, so M4≤(ρT2+ρl2)2<∞. The box is open and convex and contains μ and all values of X, so [L5] with step 1.2 gives the pointwise, mean, mean-square and scalar covariance-error bounds displayed in the Example.

3.1step 2.1algebra

The three coefficients computed in step 2.1 are exactly those displayed in the Example: a112=64π4l02T0−6, 2a11a12=−64π4l0T0−5 and a122=16π4T0−4.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 1.2step 2.2∎

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 establish the exact propagated covariance of the linearization for the initial square-integrable model; steps 1.2 and 2.2 establish its explicit Hessian correction under the additional box hypothesis.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources