Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Mean, mean-square and covariance bounds for second-order linearization error

Statement

Let m≥1, let U⊆Rm be open and convex, let h:U→R be of class C2, and let B∈[0,+∞) satisfy ∥Hh(x)∥≤B for every x∈U (A uniform Hessian bound controls the second-order Taylor remainder). Let X:Ω→Rm be a random element with X(ω)∈U for every ω, with E[X]=μ∈U and E∣X−μ∣2<+∞, and put R:=h(X)−h(μ)−∇h(μ)⋅(X−μ). Then R is integrable and ∣E[R]∣≤E∣R∣≤B2 E∣X−μ∣2. If moreover E∣X−μ∣4<+∞, then R2 is integrable and E[R2]≤B24 E∣X−μ∣4.

Vector covariance error. Let f=(f1,…,fd):U→Rd, d≥1, have C2 components satisfying ∥Hfi(x)∥≤Bi on U, Bi≥0. Keep the same input hypotheses and assume M4:=E∣X−μ∣4<∞. Put A=Df(μ), L=f(μ)+A(X−μ), S=ACov⁡(X)AT and qi=Bi2M4/4. Then f(X) is square-integrable and for every 1≤i,j≤d, ∣Cov⁡(f(X))ij−Sij∣≤Siiqj+Sjjqi+qiqj. In particular, for the scalar function h above, writing s2=Var⁡(h(μ)+∇h(μ)⋅(X−μ)) and q=B2M4/4 gives ∣Var⁡(h(X))−s2∣≤2s2q+q=Bs2M4+B24M4. No independence of input coordinates or remainders is assumed. These covariance bounds require the fourth moment; the second-moment mean bound alone does not control a covariance difference.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Objects and hypotheses as in the Statement.

[L1]

Under the stated convexity and Hessian bound, every y∈U satisfies ∣h(y)−h(μ)−∇h(μ)⋅(y−μ)∣≤B2∣y−μ∣2. (A uniform Hessian bound controls the second-order Taylor remainder)

[L2]

A continuous real-valued map on an open subset of Rm is Borel measurable, composition of a Borel map with a random element is a random variable, and sums, differences and real multiples of measurable real-valued functions are measurable. (A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets, A measurable function between measurable spaces, Random elements and real random variables, Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral)

[L3]

A measurable real-valued function g with ∣g∣≤cf pointwise, where c≥0 and f is integrable with f≥0, is integrable: monotonicity and homogeneity of the nonnegative integral give ∫∣g∣≤c∫f<+∞. (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral)

[L4]

For integrable random variables, ∣E[G]∣≤E[∣G∣], and 0≤G≤H almost surely with G,H integrable gives E[G]≤E[H]. (Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation)

[L5]

Square-integrable covariance is symmetric and bilinear, with Var⁡(Z)=E[Z2]−E[Z]2≤E[Z2]. The affine linearization has covariance ACov⁡(X)AT. (Variance and covariance identities for random variables, The covariance of the linearization is AΣAT, Mean vector and covariance matrix of a square-integrable random vector)

[L6]

Coordinatewise measurability is equivalent to measurability into Rd. (A map into Rn is measurable exactly when its coordinates are measurable)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL2

The function h is continuous because it is C2, hence Borel measurable, so h∘X is a random variable; the function x↦∇h(μ)⋅(x−μ) is an affine map, hence Borel measurable, so its composition with X is a random variable too. Therefore R, their difference, is a random variable.

1.2L4L5algebra

For any square-integrable real variables V,W, center them as V0=V−E[V], W0=W−E[W], and write a=E[V02], b=E[W02], c=E[V0W0]. Products are integrable by 2∣V0W0∣≤V02+W02. Monotonicity and linearity give 0≤E[(V0+tW0)2]=a+2tc+t2b for every real t. If b>0, take t=−c/b to obtain c2≤ab; if b=0, the affine expression a+2tc is nonnegative for all t, forcing c=0. Consequently ∣Cov⁡(V,W)∣≤Var⁡(V)Var⁡(W), including zero variances.

2.1givenstep 1.1L1algebra

Applying [L1] at y=X(ω) for every ω gives the pointwise bound ∣R∣≤B2∣X−μ∣2, and squaring gives R2≤B24∣X−μ∣4.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L3L4algebra

The function ∣X−μ∣2 is integrable by hypothesis, so step 2.1 with g=R, c=B/2 and f=∣X−μ∣2 makes R integrable by [L3], and [L4] applied to R and to the pair (0,∣R∣) gives ∣E[R]∣≤E∣R∣≤B2E∣X−μ∣2.

3.2step 1.1step 2.1givenL3L4algebra

If E∣X−μ∣4<+∞, then step 2.1 with g=R2, c=B2/4 and f=∣X−μ∣4 makes R2 integrable by [L3], and [L4] gives E[R2]≤B24E∣X−μ∣4.

4.1givenstep 1.1step 3.2L5L6algebra

In the vector case apply steps 1.1–3.2 componentwise to fi and put Ri=fi(X)−Li. Each Ri is measurable and E[Ri2]≤qi. Each Li is square-integrable as a finite linear combination of the square-integrable coordinates of X: (∑k=1makvk)2≤(∑k=1mak2)∣v∣2. Thus fi(X)=Li+Ri is square-integrable by (u+v)2≤2u2+2v2. Coordinatewise measurability gives a random vector f(X), and [L5] gives Cov⁡(L)=S and Var⁡(Ri)≤qi.

5.1step 4.1step 1.2L5algebra

By covariance bilinearity, Cov⁡(fi(X),fj(X))−Sij=Cov⁡(Li,Rj)+Cov⁡(Ri,Lj)+Cov⁡(Ri,Rj). Apply step 1.2 to these three terms and use Var⁡(Li)=Sii and Var⁡(Ri)≤qi from step 4.1. The triangle inequality yields ∣Cov⁡(f(X))ij−Sij∣≤Siiqj+Sjjqi+qiqj.

6.1step 3.1step 3.2step 5.1algebra∎

Steps 3.1 and 3.2 establish the scalar mean and mean-square conclusions; step 5.1 proves the full vector covariance conclusion, and setting d=1 with B1=B gives 2s2q+q=Bs2M4+B2M4/4.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources