Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A total-derivative Lagrangian on explicit data: the endpoint term and the unchanged equations

Physical scope

A worked gauge check on the free one-label model in three-dimensional configuration space: adding the total time derivative of F(t,x)=alphatx_1 to the free Lagrangian changes the action by endpoint values and leaves the Euler-Lagrange expression equal to the original one, hence leaves stationary curves and the model equation unchanged. The position is a vector of length dimension, time has time dimension, alpha has force dimension, and F has action dimension. The potential normalization U + gammat is the special case F = -gammat^2/2, with gamma of energy-per-time dimension. The values are exact model values of a declared computation.

Example

Declare a one-label model of the force branch of Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with N=1, mass m>0, time window I0=R, configuration domain Q=R3 and zero force map; the mechanical Lagrangian is L(t,x,v)=12m∣v∣22 (The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions). Let t0>0 be a time scale, fix the interval [t0,2t0], a dimensioned parameter α with [α]=μℓτ−2, and the C2 function

F(t,x):=α t x1,L′(t,x,v):=L(t,x,v)+Ft(t,x)+Fx(t,x)⋅v=12m∣v∣22+αx1+αt v1,

so that L′ is the Lagrangian L plus the total time derivative of F (Total-derivative Lagrangians, the potential representative and scaling: invariant stationary curves with endpoint terms). Under Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework, [m]=μ, [x]=ℓ, [t]=[t0]=τ, and [F]=[S]=μℓ2τ−1. Fix a unit vector e1=(1,0,0) and a velocity v0 with [v0]=ℓτ−1, and consider the dimensionally consistent affine curve x∗(t):=v0(t−t0) on [t0,2t0].

Then:

  1. for every C2 curve x:[t0,2t0]→R3 one has EL′(x)(t)=EL(x)(t)=−mx′′(t) at every t∈[t0,2t0], and the stationary curves of S and S′ coincide;
  2. for the curve x∗ the actions satisfy S′(x∗)−S(x∗)=F(2t0,x∗(2t0))−F(t0,x∗(t0))=2αt02(e1⋅v0), with S(x∗)=12m∣v0∣22t0 and S′(x∗)=S(x∗)+2αt02(e1⋅v0);
  3. for the reference-unit choice m=1 kg, t0=1 s, v0=(1 m s−1)e1 and α=1 kg m s−2, these values are S=0.5 kg m2 s−1, S′=2.5 kg m2 s−1 and endpoint term 2 kg m2 s−1, all of dimension μℓ2τ−1, while the equation of motion and stationary curves are unchanged.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The model and functions of the Example, the curve x∗, and a C2 curve x:[t0,2t0]→R3.

[F1]

The gauge theorem (Total-derivative Lagrangians, the potential representative and scaling: invariant stationary curves with endpoint terms): for the mechanical Lagrangian L and the C3 function F defined throughout the chart time-configuration domain with action dimension, the Lagrangian L′=L+Ft+∇xF⋅v is C2, satisfies EL′=EL and S′(x)=S(x)+F(b,x(b))−F(a,x(a)) for every C2 admissible curve, and has the same stationary curves; a potential normalization U~=U+γt uses F(t,x)=−γt2/2, where [γ]=μℓ2τ−3.

[F2]

Stationarity criterion (The stationary-action criterion and the potential-part Euler-Lagrange equation, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions): a C2 curve is stationary for the action of a mechanical Lagrangian if and only if it satisfies mx′′=−∇xU; for the free model this is x′′=0, whose solutions on [t0,2t0] are the affine vector curves.

[F3]

Calculus facts (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a), The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0, Integrable functions on [a,b] form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and ∫ab(λf+μg)=λ∫abf+μ∫abg, A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded f on [a,b] as sup⁡PL(f,P) and inf⁡PU(f,P), Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation ∫abf, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn, The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral, The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set, Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length): for this F one has Ft=αx1 and ∇xF=αte1, so ddtF(t,x(t))=Ft+∇xF⋅x′; its integral over [t0,2t0] is the endpoint difference. Also S(x∗)=∫t02t012m∣v0∣22dt=12m∣v0∣22t0.

Verification

technique · direct; compute the two Euler-Lagrange expressions on a general curve and evaluate the endpoint term and both actions on explicit data
1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

The displayed F(t,x)=αtx1 is a polynomial, hence C∞ (in particular C3), throughout the chart projection R×R3. For a C2 curve x on [t0,2t0], ∇xL′=αe1 and Lv′=mx′+αte1, so EL′(x)(t)=αe1−ddt(mx′(t)+αte1)=−mx′′(t)=EL(x)(t) pointwise; hence the vanishing sets on this interval coincide and, by [F2], so do the stationary curves.

1.2F1F3givenalgebra

Endpoint term on the explicit curve: x∗(t0)=0 and x∗(2t0)=v0t0, so F(t0,x∗(t0))=0 and F(2t0,x∗(2t0))=2αt02(e1⋅v0). By [F1] this is S′(x∗)−S(x∗).

2.1F1F3step 1.2algebra

Actions: S(x∗)=12m∣v0∣22t0 by [F3], and step 1.2 gives S′(x∗)=S(x∗)+2αt02(e1⋅v0).

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Reference-unit data: substituting the specified m,t0,v0,α into step 2.1 gives S=(1/2) kg m2 s−1 and S′=(5/2) kg m2 s−1, differing by endpoint term 2 kg m2 s−1. Their numerical values in that SI action unit are 0.5, 2.5 and 2, respectively; the dimension is μℓ2τ−1. The curve x∗ is affine, hence stationary for both actions by [F2], and the model equation x′′=0 is the same for both.

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1F1∎

Clauses 1-3 are verified: the total-derivative modification changes the action by the endpoint value of F and leaves the Euler-Lagrange expression, the stationary curves and the model equation unchanged; the potential normalization is the case F=−γt2/2 by [F1].

Remarks

  • The endpoint value 2αt02(e1⋅v0) is not the difference of a physical energy: it depends on the chosen F and the endpoints. The illustration complements the gauge theorem of this page, which licenses reading the potential's arbitrary c(t) as such a total derivative.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources