Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two explicit free-rotation models checked: principal-axis spins, a non-uniform symmetric-top motion with its invariants, and the linearized frequencies of an asymmetric top

Physical scope

Worked checks inside the torque-free branch of the rigid-material model of Adoption of the rigid-material model branch: reference mass distribution, rigid placements, orientation and scope on the declared time window I0=R for both models and two declared inertia matrices: a symmetric model with body inertia matrix diag(1,1,2) and an asymmetric model with diag(1,2,3). The checks verify principal-axis spins and their invariants, an explicit non-uniform symmetric-top motion with conserved angular momentum and energy, and the linearized frequencies at the principal-axis spins of the asymmetric model. No measured value, no concrete body and no experiment is asserted; the numerical data are declared model parameters under the explicit numerical SI convention dimensionless t = T / (one second) in the Example.

Example

Numerical SI convention. Let T denote physical elapsed time and fix T∗=1 s, M∗=1 kg and D∗=1 m. Below t:=T/T∗ is dimensionless and all quantities are numerical SI values: inertia is divided by M∗D∗2, angular velocity and its perturbations by T∗−1, angular momentum by M∗D∗2/T∗, and energy by M∗D∗2/T∗2. Primes differentiate with respect to t. Restore physical angular velocity by ωphys(T)=ω(T/T∗)/T∗ and angular momentum by lphys(T)=(M∗D∗2/T∗)l(T/T∗). The displayed numerical rates 1, 2, 1/3 mean physical rates 1/T∗, 2/T∗, 1/(3T∗); λj is restored by λj,phys=λj/T∗2. Thus cos⁡t, sin⁡t, cos⁡(t/3) and the hyperbolic functions have dimensionless arguments; t=π/2 means T=πT∗/2. For the reconstructed motion use xphys(T,ρphys)=D∗x(T/T∗,ρphys/D∗); the chain rule restores RphysTdRphys/dT=[ωphys]× and the dimensioned torque-free equation. This convention uses Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework and reports no measurement.

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), inherited for finite mass moments and inertial integrals through the rigid-material and torque-balance suppliers, and for the double-cover surjectivity used in the quaternion constructions below. Consider two declared models of the rigid-material branch Adoption of the rigid-material model branch: reference mass distribution, rigid placements, orientation and scope, each with body inertia matrix diagonal in the declared positively oriented orthonormal basis (e1,e2,e3) and no other inertia data, each with time window I0=R (equivalently all physical times T∈R), each used in the torque-free branch of Adoption of the external-torque branch of the rigid-material model: declared torque data and the balance of angular momentum about the centre of mass clause (iv):

Verify the following.

  1. Principal-axis spins. For each model, each j and each Ω∈R, the constant path ω≡Ωej is the body angular velocity of a torque-free motion; along it l=ΩIjej is constant, C=Ω2Ij2 and E=12Ω2Ij. In Model S with j=3 and Ω=2 this gives l=4e3, C=16, E=4; in Model A with j=1 and Ω=1 it gives l=e1, C=1, E=12.
  2. A non-uniform symmetric-top motion. For Model S the path ω(t)=(12cos⁡t, 12sin⁡t, 1)(t∈R) satisfies the torque-free Euler equations l′=l×(I−1l) and is the body angular velocity of a torque-free motion of Model S; along it l(t)=(12cos⁡t, 12sin⁡t, 2),C=174,E=98,∥ω(t)∥22=54, and ω is not constant: ω(π2)−ω(0)=(−12,12,0).
  3. Linearization of Model A at its principal-axis spins. At the spin Ωe1 with Ω=1 the linearized system of Linearization of the torque-free spin of the rigid-material model at a principal-axis spin: the oscillatory/exponential dichotomy and linear stability has λ1=−13, κ1=1/3, and the pair (δ2,δ3)=(cos⁡(t/3), −13sin⁡(t/3)) solves the transverse equations; at the intermediate spin e2 with Ω=1 the linearized system has λ2=13>0 and the solution with δ1(0)=1, δ3(0)=0 has δ1(t)=cosh⁡(t/3), which is unbounded on [0,∞); at the extreme spin e3 with Ω=1 one has κ3=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two models S and A of the Example with time window I0=R and their declared diagonal inertia matrices, the torque-free branch, and the data j, Ω of each claim.

[L1]

Model data and nondegeneracy: for each model the body inertia matrix I=∫(∥ρ∥22I3−ρρT) dν is diagonal with the displayed positive entries in the declared basis, and the model is nondegenerate (Inertia matrix, spatial inertia tensor, inertia tensor about a point and moment of inertia about an axis of a rigid-material model clauses (a) and (d)-(e), Principal axes and principal moments of the inertia data of a rigid-material model, axis moments and extremal values clauses (a) and (d), The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn).

[L2]

Principal-axis spins: for a nondegenerate torque-free model, every axis j, rate Ω and initial orientation there is a torque-free motion with constant body angular velocity Ωej, and along the motions l=ΩIjej, C=Ω2Ij2, E=12Ω2Ij (Principal-axis uniform rotations of the torque-free rigid-material model: existence, a fixed spatial direction, the invariants, and the converse classification clauses 1-3).

[L3]

Torque-free equations and invariants: Lc=Rl, and l=Iω satisfies l′=l×(I−1l), and ⟨l,l⟩ and 12⟨l,I−1l⟩ are constant along solutions; the latter is E=12ωTIω (Torque-free motion of the rigid-material model: conservation of the angular momentum about the centre of mass, the energy-momentum invariants, the principal-axis equations and global existence of the spin dynamics clauses 2-3, Euler's equations with torque for the rigid-material model, the rotational power identity, the torque-free reduction and frame covariance clause 4).

[L4]

Realisability: for every continuous ω:R→R3 there is a C2 rotation path with body angular velocity ω if ω is C1; and a C2 rotation path with any prescribed initial orientation exists by the surjectivity of the quaternion cover (The quaternion lift of a prescribed continuous angular velocity: q′=12q φ(ω(t)) keeps S3 invariant, its rotation path has body angular velocity ω, and the initial value problem has a unique solution on the whole interval clauses 1-2, The quaternion rotation map ρ: conjugation on the imaginary quaternions, the unit sphere S3, and quaternion lifts and its second remark).

[L5]

Linearization: the derivative of the torque-free spin field at Ωej and the dichotomy with λj=Ω2(Ia−Ij)(Ij−Ib)/(IaIb) and κj=∣λj∣, with the explicit cos⁡,sin⁡ and cosh⁡,sinh⁡ solutions (Linearization of the torque-free spin of the rigid-material model at a principal-axis spin: the oscillatory/exponential dichotomy and linear stability clauses 1-2).

[L7]

Quarter-turn values: π=2γ>0 for the smallest positive cosine zero γ, and sin⁡(π/2)=1, cos⁡(π/2)=0 (Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine, Cosine has a smallest positive zero, lying strictly between zero and two, Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi); square roots denote unique nonnegative roots (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}).

Proof

technique · direct; instantiate the general statements on the declared diagonal data and check the displayed formulas by differentiation and expansion
1.1givenL1L2algebra

By [L2] applied to each model, each j and each Ω there is a torque-free motion with constant body angular velocity Ωej, and l=ΩIjej, C=Ω2Ij2, E=12Ω2Ij along it; for Model S with I3=2, j=3, Ω=2 this gives l=4e3, C=(2⋅2)2=16, E=12⋅4⋅2=4, and for Model A with I1=1, j=1, Ω=1 it gives l=e1, C=1, E=12, which is claim 1.

1.2givenL1L3L6algebra

For the path ω of claim 2 in Model S, l=Iω=(12cos⁡t,12sin⁡t,2) by [L1], so l′=(−12sin⁡t,12cos⁡t,0) by [L6], while l×(I−1l)=l×(12cos⁡t,12sin⁡t,1) has components (12sin⁡t⋅1−2⋅12sin⁡t, −(12cos⁡t⋅1−2⋅12cos⁡t), 12cos⁡t⋅12sin⁡t−12sin⁡t⋅12cos⁡t)=(−12sin⁡t,12cos⁡t,0) by the coordinate formula for the cross product in [L6]; hence l′=l×(I−1l), so l solves the torque-free equations and ω satisfies the Euler equations by [L3].

1.3givenL5L6algebra

For claim 3, [L5] gives λj=Ω2(Ia−Ij)(Ij−Ib)/(IaIb); for Model A and j=1, with a=2, b=3: λ1=(2−1)(1−3)2⋅3=−13 and κ1=1/3; for j=2, with the cyclic choice a=3, b=1: λ2=(3−2)(2−1)3⋅1=13 and κ2=1/3; for j=3, with a=1, b=2: λ3=(1−3)(3−2)1⋅2=−1 and κ3=1. In the first case the linearized field of [L5] satisfies Ae2=−13e3 and Ae3=e2, and the pair δ2(t)=cos⁡(t/3), δ3(t)=−13sin⁡(t/3) satisfies δ2′=δ3 and δ3′=−13δ2 by [L6], so it solves the transverse linearized equations.

2.1step 1.2givenL1L6L7algebra

The quantities of claim 2: ∥ω(t)∥22=14cos⁡2t+14sin⁡2t+1=14+1=54 and C=⟨l,l⟩=14cos⁡2t+14sin⁡2t+4=174 by the Pythagorean identity in [L6]; and E=12ωTIω=12(14cos⁡2t+14sin⁡2t+2⋅1)=12(14+2)=98. The difference ω(π2)−ω(0)=(−12,12,0)≠0 has norm 22, so ω is not constant.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1givenL3L4L6

Since ω is C∞, hence C1, [L4] supplies a C1 rotation path R:R→SO(3) with body angular velocity ω and any prescribed initial orientation; then R′=R[ω]× is C1, so R is of class C2, and x:I0×R3→R3, x(t,ρ):=R(t)ρ (that is, c≡0), is a motion of Model S on its declared window I0=R by Adoption of the rigid-material model branch: reference mass distribution, rigid placements, orientation and scope clause (ii) with body angular velocity ω and l as in step 1.2. Its balance holds: Lc=Rl by [L3], so (Rl)′=R′l+Rl′=R(ω×l+l′)=0 because l′=l×(I−1l)=l×ω=−ω×l from step 1.2 and the alternation of the cross product in [L6]; hence the motion is torque-free and realizes claim 2.

4.1step 1.3givenL5L6algebra∎

In the intermediate case j=2, the same formulas give Ae1=−13e3 and Ae3=−e1, so the transverse system is δ1′=−δ3, δ3′=−13δ1; with δ1(0)=1, δ3(0)=0 the cosh⁡,sinh⁡ solution of [L5] is δ1(t)=cosh⁡(t/3), δ3(t)=−13sinh⁡(t/3), and δ1 is unbounded on [0,∞) by [L6]; hence the linearized system at the intermediate spin of Model A has an unbounded solution, which is claim 3.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources