Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular but not hyperregular: the Lagrangian ev, its branch H(p)=pln⁡p−p on p>0 and the absent inverse at nonpositive momenta

Example

Take n=1, J=U=R, and consider the fibre-full C2 chart Lagrangian

L:R×R×R⟶R,L(t,q,v):=ev

(The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity, A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations). Then:

  1. L is regular on the chart: Lv(t,q,v)=ev and Lvv(t,q,v)=ev>0 for every (t,q,v), so the velocity Hessian is nonsingular at every state and the Legendre map is a local C1 diffeomorphism at every state (Nonsingular velocity Hessian is equivalent to invertibility of the Legendre derivative, hence gives a local C^1 inverse).
  2. L is not hyperregular on the chart: the fibre velocity map v↦ev has image (0,∞) and is not a bijection of R onto R, so there is no inverse branch defined on the whole momentum line; a momentum p≤0 is not the fibre derivative of any velocity, and no Hamiltonian of a branch is defined there (The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity).
  3. on the momentum half-line p>0 the inverse branch is v(p)=ln⁡p, the unique real number with ev(p)=p (The exponential is a continuous bijection from R onto (0,∞)), and the Hamiltonian of that branch is

H:(0,∞)⟶R,H(p)=p v(p)−ev(p)=pln⁡p−p,

with H′(p)=ln⁡p=v(p) for every p>0; in particular the differential identity Hp=v of The Hamiltonian on an inverse Legendre branch: differential, equivalence with the Euler-Lagrange equation, and the energy identity clause 1 holds on this branch even though the chart is not hyperregular. 4. for every nonempty open interval I and every C2 curve q:I→R with p(t):=eq′(t) one has: q˙=H′(p) and p˙=0 hold for all t∈I if and only if the Euler-Lagrange expression of L vanishes, EL(q)(t)=0, for all t∈I.

The example is a pure chart computation: L=ev is not of the natural mechanical form 12vTGv+A⋅v−V, and no physical interpretation of it is claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The fibre-full C2 chart Lagrangian L(t,q,v)=ev on R×R×R, its Legendre map and velocity Hessian, the momentum half-line p>0, and a C2 curve q:I→R with p(t)=eq′(t).

[F1]

Legendre map and regularity (The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity, Nonsingular velocity Hessian is equivalent to invertibility of the Legendre derivative, hence gives a local C^1 inverse, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, Invertible Euclidean linear maps): the Legendre map of a fibre-full C2 chart is F(t,q,v)=(t,q,Lv(t,q,v)), it is regular at a state exactly when the velocity Hessian there is nonsingular, and a nonsingular velocity Hessian then yields a local C1 diffeomorphism onto the image.

[F3]

Exponential range (The exponential is a continuous bijection from R onto (0,∞)): the exponential is a bijection of R onto (0,∞); consequently every p>0 has exactly one logarithm v(p)∈R and no real v satisfies ev=p for p≤0.

[F4]

Branch identities (The Hamiltonian on an inverse Legendre branch: differential, equivalence with the Euler-Lagrange equation, and the energy identity, The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity): on a hyperregular chart the branch Hamiltonian satisfies Hp=v, Hq=−Lq and Ht=−Lt, while hyperregularity is the global-in-the-fibre condition of the cited definition, requiring the fibre map to be a bijection onto the whole momentum fibre; the local computations of step 1.3 therefore do not presuppose it.

[F5]

Euler-Lagrange data (A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations, Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length): the Euler-Lagrange expression of a chart Lagrangian is EL(q)=Lq(t,q,q′)−ddt(Lv(t,q,q′)), and C2 curves on an open interval are differentiated in the usual sense.

Verification

technique · direct; differentiate $e^{v}$, identify the image of the fibre map from the range of the exponential, invert on the positive half-line, and compare the two evolution equations
1.1F1F2algebra

The velocity derivatives are Lv(t,q,v)=ev and Lvv(t,q,v)=ev by [F2], and ev>0 at every state by [F2]; hence det⁡Lvv≠0 everywhere and [F1] makes L regular on the chart with a local C1 inverse at every state, which is clause 1.

1.2F1F3

By [F3] the map v↦ev has image (0,∞) and is injective, so it is not a bijection of R onto R; by [F1] the chart is hyperregular only if each fibre velocity map is a bijection onto the whole momentum fibre, hence L is not hyperregular, no inverse branch exists over p≤0, and over p>0 the inverse is the unique v(p) with ev(p)=p; this is clause 2.

1.3F2F3algebra

For p>0 set v(p):=ln⁡p, the unique inverse of e at p by [F3]; differentiating the identity ev(p)=p by the chain rule gives ev(p)v′(p)=1, so v′(p)=1/p>0; the branch Hamiltonian is H(p)=p v(p)−ev(p)=pln⁡p−p and its derivative is H′(p)=v(p)+p v′(p)−ev(p)v′(p)=v(p)+(p−p)v′(p)=ln⁡p, using ev(p)=p and the product rule of [F2].

1.4F2F3F5algebra

Clause 4: with p(t)=eq′(t) the inverse relation gives q′(t)=v(p(t))=ln⁡p(t)=H′(p(t)), so the first Hamilton equation is automatic; the second, p˙=0, is equivalent to ddteq′=eq′q′′=0, i.e. to q′′=0 because eq′>0; by [F5] the Euler-Lagrange expression of L is EL(q)=−ddteq′=−eq′q′′, so p˙=0 is equivalent to EL(q)=0; this is clause 4 in both directions.

2.1F4step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4∎

Collecting steps 1.1-1.4 proves clauses 1-4; by [F4] the branch identity used in clause 3 is the local instance of the general differential identity, while clause 2 shows that the global hypothesis of that proposition fails here, so no global Hamiltonian on the whole momentum line is asserted.

Remarks

  • Where the global structure stops. The failure is exactly surjectivity of the fibre map: injectivity of v↦ev holds and gives the unique branch v(p)=ln⁡p over the image, but momentum zero and negative momenta are not fibre derivatives of any velocity of the chart. The example thus separates the two hypotheses of The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity — nonsingular velocity Hessian and bijectivity onto the momentum fibre — and shows that a local branch at every state need not assemble into a global one.

  • Not a natural mechanical Lagrangian. The chart Lagrangian ev is not of the form 12vTGv+A⋅v−V with positive definite G; the regular non-hyperregular separation exhibited here therefore does not contradict the hyperregularity of natural mechanical charts, which rests on the positivity of the kinetic matrix.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources