How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Worked E0 check: constant-coefficient transport on the three-torus, explicit solution and conserved energy
Example
On take , , , , , so the system of Periodic first-order symmetric hyperbolic systems: coefficients, admissible values, data classes and solutions reads , with real-valued and integer . This example exhibits the explicit solution on the periodic domain, , verifies that it is the E0 solution, and checks the weighted energy identity for the energy directly.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the torus data and the system with real datum , integer .
The periodic torus, its characters and the spaces are those of The 2 pi-periodic three-torus, its normalized measure, test functions and the Sobolev spaces H^s; for a periodic function the translate is again in with the same norm, by the derivative rule and the periodicity of the Fourier representation (Periodic Fourier differentiation identity and equivalence of the derivative and Fourier-weight Sobolev norms, Periodic Sobolev embedding: H^s on the three-torus controls C^m when s minus m exceeds three halves supplies the representative since ).
E0 existence and uniqueness for this system: the data with values in any compact interval and finite norm admit a classical Sobolev solution, unique by Uniqueness of classical solutions and continuous dependence in H^{s-1} for periodic symmetric hyperbolic systems, with ; the solution is found by the Galerkin/limit construction (Local existence of Sobolev and classical solutions of a periodic symmetric hyperbolic system, uniform on bounded H^s data). [L2]
The metric measure is translation invariant on the torus and for every smooth periodic (the fundamental theorem of calculus on one period, as in Periodic Fourier differentiation identity and equivalence of the derivative and Fourier-weight Sobolev norms step 1.1). [L3]
The finite Fourier projection and its range are Fourier modes on the periodic three-torus and the Galerkin projection P_N; commutes with spatial derivatives and maps into (The Galerkin projection is self-adjoint, commutes with derivatives, is a contraction in every H^r, converges to the identity and has the sharp Fourier-tail bound). For , the weighted Galerkin energy of Equivalence of the weighted Galerkin energy with the H^s norm and its Gronwall inequality is .
Verification
(The explicit function solves the system.) Define . Then and , so pointwise; , and is classical because integer and inherits the -bound of at every time, with higher smoothness whenever is smooth.
(Energy identity.) by translation invariance [L3]; equivalently, differentiating under the integral and using the equation and [L3], .
(Identification with the E0 solution.) By [L2] there is a unique solution through ; the explicit function of step 1.1 is one, so the E0 solution is and its energy is conserved. For the actual Galerkin energy, set , equivalently . By [L4] this smooth finite Fourier polynomial solves with datum , hence its projected equation. Each Fourier coefficient obeys , so this is exactly the Galerkin trajectory. Every is the translate of ; translation invariance gives and . Thus the actual energy inequality is verified with , at every cutoff , as well as the zero-order identity of step 2.1.
Depends on
Fourier modes on the periodic three-torus and the Galerkin projection P_N
The Galerkin projection is self-adjoint, commutes with derivatives, is a contraction in every H^r, converges to the identity and has the sharp Fourier-tail bound
Periodic Sobolev embedding: H^s on the three-torus controls C^m when s minus m exceeds three halves
The 2 pi-periodic three-torus, its normalized measure, test functions and the Sobolev spaces H^s
Periodic first-order symmetric hyperbolic systems: coefficients, admissible values, data classes and solutions
Local existence of Sobolev and classical solutions of a periodic symmetric hyperbolic system, uniform on bounded H^s data
Periodic Fourier differentiation identity and equivalence of the derivative and Fourier-weight Sobolev norms
Uniqueness of classical solutions and continuous dependence in H^{s-1} for periodic symmetric hyperbolic systems
Equivalence of the weighted Galerkin energy with the H^s norm and its Gronwall inequality
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- H. Friedrich and A. D. Rendall, The Cauchy Problem for the Einstein Equations, Living Reviews in Relativity 3 (2000), article 1 (arXiv:gr-qc/0002074), Section 3.1 (Symmetric Hyperbolic Systems): the definition of a quasilinear symmetric hyperbolic system, the finite-dimensional mollifier approximation (3.1) solved by ODE theory, the energy and Moser product/composition estimates, the higher-order energy inequality, uniqueness, the Rellich/Ascoli compactness step and the passage to a classical solution, with Remarks 1-6 on smooth persistence, the continuation criterion, Cauchy stability and the non-identity time matrix
- M. E. Taylor, Fourier Analysis, Distributions, and Constant-Coefficient Linear PDE (UNC lecture notes, 2018), Section 1 (Fourier series on the torus T^n): characters, Fourier coefficients, the Parseval identity and convergence of the coefficient series