Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Periodic Sobolev embedding: H^s on the three-torus controls C^m when s minus m exceeds three halves

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let integers s≥m≥0 satisfy s−m>3/2, and let u∈Hs(T2π3;RN) with the objects and notation of The 2 pi-periodic three-torus, its normalized measure, test functions and the Sobolev spaces H^s. Then:

(a) There is a unique representative u∗∈Cm(T2π3;RN) of the class u, and for every ∣α∣≤m the series ∑k∈Z3(ik)αu^(k)χk converges absolutely and uniformly on T2π3 to Dαu∗; moreover there is C=C(s,m,N) with ∥u∗∥Cm≤C ∥u∥Hs.

(b) Writing d(x,y):=min⁡{ ∣x−y+2πl∣:l∈Z3 } for the induced metric on T2π3 and fixing 0<θ≤min⁡{1,s−m−32}, there is C′=C′(s,m,N,θ) with ∣Dαu∗(x)−Dαu∗(y)∣≤C′ ∥u∥Hs d(x,y)θ(x,y∈T2π3, ∣α∣≤m).

(c) The assignment u↦u∗ is linear; and if (uj) is a sequence in Hs with uj→u in Hs, then uj∗→u∗ uniformly together with all derivatives of order at most m.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, integers s≥m≥0 with s−m>3/2, and u∈Hs(T2π3;RN).

[L1]

Differentiation identity and norm equivalence: for v∈Hs and ∣α∣≤s, Dαv∈Hs−∣α∣ and Dαv^(k)=(ik)αv^(k); and Ns(v)2≤4s∥v∥Hs2 with Ns(v)2:=∑k(1+∣k∣2)s∣v^(k)∣2, while ∥v∥Hs2≤(s+1)3Ns(v)2 (Periodic Fourier differentiation identity and equivalence of the derivative and Fourier-weight Sobolev norms).

[L2]

Characters and coefficients: (χk) is the orthonormal basis of L2 from the finite torus theorem and v^(k)=∫v χ−k dμ (The 2 pi-periodic three-torus, its normalized measure, test functions and the Sobolev spaces H^s).

[L3]

Sums over an arbitrary index set: for a nonnegative family (ck)k∈Z3 the sum over the finite-subset net is a supremum of finite subsums; it is finite exactly when these are bounded; if finite, for every ε>0 there is a finite F0 with tail sum <ε; finite subsums are monotone under inclusion. Absolutely summable complex families are summable, and finite Cauchy--Schwarz bounds pass to the supremum over finite subsets (Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ℓ2(I)).

[L4]

Finite-dimensional Cauchy--Schwarz: ∣∑i∈Faibi∣≤(∑i∈Fai2)1/2(∑i∈Fbi2)1/2 for real lists indexed by a finite set F (Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨u,v⟩∣≤∥u∥∥v∥, with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors, The standard formulas ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn and ∑k<nxkyk‾ on Cn are inner products).

[L5]

Uniform differentiation on an interval: if fj are C1 on [a,b], fj(c) converges for some c∈[a,b], and fj′→g uniformly, then fj→f uniformly for a differentiable f with f′=g (If continuously differentiable functions converge at one point and their derivatives converge uniformly on a closed interval, then the functions converge uniformly to a differentiable function whose derivative is the derivative limit, Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space); a uniform limit of continuous complex functions is continuous (A uniform limit of continuous complex-valued functions is continuous).

[L6]

The Euclidean mean value bound ∣χk(x)−χk(y)∣≤min⁡{2,∣k∣ d(x,y)} holds for the characters and the metric d of the statement, because ∣∇χk∣=∣k∣ pointwise and the torus metric is induced by the Euclidean metric on representatives.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L3L4algebra

(Absolute convergence bound.) For ∣α∣≤m, finite Cauchy--Schwarz gives ∑k∈F∣kα∣∣u^(k)∣≤(∑k∈F∣kα∣2(1+∣k∣2)−s)1/2Ns(u)≤(∑k(1+∣k∣2)−(s−m))1/2Ns(u). Finite-subset suprema preserve this inequality.

2.1step 1.1L1algebra

(The weight sum is finite.) For θ>3/2, ∑k∈Z3(1+∣k∣2)−θ<+∞: the ball ∣k∣≤1 contributes at most 27 terms, and the dyadic shell 2j≤∣k∣<2j+1 (j≥0) contains at most C323j lattice points each weighted by at most 2−2jθ, so the shell sum is at most C32−j(2θ−3) and ∑j2−j(2θ−3)<∞ by the geometric series. Hence with θ:=s−m step 1.1 gives ∑k∣kα∣∣u^(k)∣≤Cs,mNs(u)≤Cs,m′∥u∥Hs by [L1].

3.1step 2.1L2L3L5

(The limit series gives a Cm representative.) For finite F put SF:=∑k∈Fu^(k)χk, a C∞ function. If F,G are finite then ∥SF−SG∥Cm≤max⁡∣α∣≤m∑k∈F△G∣kα∣∣u^(k)∣, and the tail sums tend to zero along the finite-subset net by [L3] and step 2.1; hence the derivative series for every ∣α∣≤m satisfies the uniform Cauchy property on T2π3. Applying the interval differentiation theorem [L5] successively along each coordinate direction and for each order gives a Cm function u∗ with Dαu∗=∑k(ik)αu^(k)χk for every ∣α∣≤m, the series converging absolutely and uniformly by step 2.1; and ∥u∗∥Cm≤C∥u∥Hs by step 2.1. Since SF→u in L2 by [L2] and SF→u∗ uniformly, u∗ represents the class u; two continuous representatives of one L2 class agree everywhere, giving uniqueness. This proves (a).

4.1step 2.1step 3.1L1L4L6algebra

(The Hölder endpoint.) Put d=d(x,y) and q=s−m, an integer at least 2. Cauchy--Schwarz and [L6] bound the square of the derivative difference by Ns(u)2S(d), where S(d)=∑k(1+∣k∣2)−qmin⁡{4,∣k∣2d2}. For 0<d≤1 split at ∣k∣=d−1. A dyadic shell of radius L≥1 has at most CL3 points. If q=2, its low-frequency contribution is at most Cd2L; summing shells up to d−1 gives at most Cd, while high shells contribute at most CL−1 and sum to at most Cd. If q≥3, the entire series ∑k∣k∣2(1+∣k∣2)−q converges by the same shell estimate, so S(d)≤Cd2. Thus the endpoint exponent is 1/2 for q=2 and 1 for q≥3, exactly min⁡{1,q−3/2}. Smaller positive exponents follow since dθ0≤max⁡{1,diam⁡(T3)θ0−θ}dθ; for d>1 use the sup norm from (a), and for d=0 the claim is immediate. This proves (b) with all its stated endpoints.

5.1step 3.1algebra∎

(Linearity and convergence (c).) Dα is linear and the series representation is linear in the coefficients, so u↦u∗ is linear; and for uj→u in Hs, applying (a) to the difference gives ∥uj∗−u∗∥Cm≤C∥uj−u∥Hs→0, which is uniform convergence of all derivatives of order at most m.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources