Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth composition, difference, coefficient product and commutator estimates on bounded H^s data

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let s≥5 be an integer, let O⊆Rm be open, let I be an open time interval, let I0⊆I be a compact interval, and let F:I×T3×O→Rm′ and A:I×T3×O→Mm′(R) be smooth. Fix compact K⊆O and R≥0. Constants below depend on these data and are uniform in t∈I0. For u,v∈Hs with values in K and norms at most R:

(a) ∥F(t,⋅,u)∥Hj≤C(1+∥u∥Hs) for 0≤j≤s.

(b) ∥F(t,⋅,u)−F(t,⋅,v)∥Hs−1≤C∥u−v∥Hs−1. The same bound holds at order zero.

(c) For 1≤j=∣α∣≤s−1, ∥[Dα,A(t,⋅,u)]w∥2≤C∥w∥Hj−1. For ∣α∣=s, ∥[Dα,A(t,⋅,u)]w∥2≤C∥w∥Hs−1. Commutators are interpreted distributionally by their Leibniz expansion, even if the two individual order-j terms are not separately in L2.

(d) For 0≤j≤s−1, ∥A(t,⋅,u)w∥Hj≤C∥w∥Hj.

(e) Let n≥6 be an integer, ρ≥0 and z∈Hn with values in K and ∥z∥Hn−1≤ρ. Then ∥F(t,⋅,z)∥Hn≤Cρ(1+∥z∥Hn). Moreover for w∈Hn−1 and ∣α∣≤n, ∥[Dα,A(t,⋅,z)]w∥2≤Cρ(∥w∥Hn−1+(1+∥z∥Hn)∥w∥Hn−2). The same estimates apply to any smooth coefficient obtained from F,A by differentiation or by a smooth matrix inverse where that inverse exists on a neighborhood of I0×T3×K.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the smooth coefficient maps, compact time and value sets, and the stated norm bounds.

[L3]

Fourier truncation gives smooth density in every Hq (The Galerkin projection is self-adjoint, commutes with derivatives, is a contraction in every H^r, converges to the identity and has the sharp Fourier-tail bound); Smooth maps are totally differentiable with their partial-derivative matrices (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative), and D(G∘f)=DG(f)Df (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)). The one-variable Leibniz rule holds at every order (The general Leibniz rule for the n-th derivative of a product). Applying it successively in each coordinate gives Dα(av)=∑γ≤α(αγ)Dγa Dα−γv: each coordinate splits its derivatives independently, multiplying the binomial coefficients. Iterating the first-order chain rule gives the finite chain expansions used below, with the sum of orders on the field factors at most ∣α∣.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

(Localize coefficients without convexity.) Cover K by finitely many balls whose doubled closed balls lie in O. In each doubled ball choose a smooth bump equal to 1 on the inner ball and zero outside the doubled ball; such a radial bump is constructed from η(r)=e−1/r for r>0 and 0 otherwise, whose derivatives at zero vanish since exponential decay dominates every polynomial. If these bumps are ϕl, put χ=1−∏l(1−ϕl). Then χ=1 on a neighborhood of K and has compact support in O. Extend χF and χA by zero in the value variable outside O. They are smooth and equal to the original coefficients near K. On I0 times the torus times the compact convex hull of any fixed compact neighborhood of K, all their required derivatives are bounded. This permits line-segment arguments even when O is nonconvex.

2.1step 1.1L1L3algebra

(Composition (a).) For a smooth u, the order-j chain expansion consists of bounded coefficient derivatives times products ∏lDβlu with total order at most j≤s. At most one factor has order at least s−1, since 2(s−1)>s; all others have order at most s−2 and are bounded in L∞ by [L1]. The possible exceptional factor has L2 norm bounded by ∥u∥Hs; if there is no exceptional factor, use finite volume. Thus each term is at most CR(1+∥u∥Hs), proving the asserted bound. For a general Sobolev field, Fourier truncations have bounded Hs norms and converge uniformly to u, with values eventually in a fixed compact neighborhood of K. Apply the smooth bound to the extension of step 1.1. Fourier coefficients of the compositions converge by uniform convergence; finite weighted Fourier sums give the same Hs bound for the limit. This also identifies the weak derivative expansion by testing the smooth approximations.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2algebra

(Differences (b).) With the extended coefficient and uθ=v+θ(u−v), the pointwise identity F(u)−F(v)=∫01Fu(uθ)(u−v) dθ holds. The maps uθ have Hs norm at most R and take values in the compact convex hull of K. Step 2.1 applied to the extended derivative bounds Fu(uθ) in Hs−1 uniformly. The algebra estimate [L2] gives the Hs−1 difference bound after integration. At order zero bounded Fu gives the pointwise Lipschitz estimate and hence its L2 version.

3.2step 2.1L1L3algebra

(Homogeneous commutators (c).) Expand [Dα,A(u)]w=∑0<γ≤α(αγ)Dγ(A(u))Dα−γw. For ∣γ∣≤s−2, step 2.1 and [L1] bound the first factor in L∞; the second has at most j−1 derivatives. For j≤s−1 the only remaining case is j=∣γ∣=s−1, where the first factor is L2 bounded and w is L∞ bounded by its Hs−2 norm. For j=s and ∣γ∣≥s−1, at most one derivative falls on w, which is L∞ bounded by its Hs−1 norm. These cases give precisely (c), without an additive constant. Density gives the distributional identity and bounds for general w.

3.3step 2.1L1L3algebra

(Multipliers (d).) In the Leibniz expansion at order j≤s−1, coefficient derivatives at most s−2 are L∞ bounded. The only remaining case is a coefficient derivative of order s−1, with no derivative on w and j=s−1; its L2 norm is bounded and w has the required L∞ bound. Summation gives (d). Smooth approximation proves the claimed product membership for general Sobolev w.

4.1step 1.1L1L3algebra∎

(Lower-norm-controlled high estimates (e).) With ∥z∥Hn−1≤ρ, derivatives of z of order at most n−3 are L∞ bounded. In the order-n chain expansion at most one factor has order at least n−2, since 2(n−2)>n. Its L2 norm is bounded by ρ unless its order is n, in which case it is bounded by ∥z∥Hn. This proves the high composition bound. In a commutator with ∣α∣≤n, a coefficient derivative of order at most n−3 is bounded in L∞, and the remaining derivative of w has order at most n−1. A coefficient derivative of order at least n−2 has L2 bound Cρ(1+∥z∥Hn), and at most two derivatives land on w; their L∞ bound follows from w∈Hn−2, since n−4≥2. Sum the finite expansion. Density extends the bound as in step 2.1. All smooth derived coefficients are covered by the same argument. This proves (e).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources