Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The scaled Newtonian comparison system for the quadratic potential: explicit harmonic solutions, a compact convex containing ball and the hypotheses of the scaled trajectory theorem

Example

Work on the flat model with inertial chart x, let L>0 be a length, Ω=R×B2L(0) with spatial base U=B2L(0), and K=B‾L/2(0)⊂U. Set C:=1, ε0:=1/16, r≡0 and

φ(x):=∣x∣22L2,Φ=εc2φ.

Every unmarked norm ∣⋅∣ of a vector in R3 below means ∥⋅∥2 from the Euclidean inner product (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn). The gradient is the coordinate vector of partial derivatives (The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case), and the Hessian bound below uses the induced operator norm ∥D2ψ∥op of Scaled trajectory limit: weak-field geodesics converge to the Newtonian system, with rate O(epsilon) for identical initial data.

These are stationary weak-field data (Stationary weak-field data: the diagonal ansatz, its bounds, stationarity and the Einstein-family condition). The scaled spatial base is UL=B2(0) and the scaled potential is

ψ(X)=φ(LX)=12∣X∣2,∇ψ(X)=X,D2ψ=I3.

For any S∗>0 and initial vectors X0,W0∈R3 satisfying R0:=∣X0∣+∣W0∣<2, the Newtonian comparison system of Scaled trajectory limit: weak-field geodesics converge to the Newtonian system, with rate O(epsilon) for identical initial data

X∗′(S)=W∗(S),W∗′(S)=−∇ψ(X∗(S))=−X∗(S)

has the solution

X∗(S)=cos⁡S X0+sin⁡S W0,W∗(S)=−sin⁡S X0+cos⁡S W0.

Its spatial range is contained in B‾R0(0):={X:∥X∥2≤R0}, with B‾0(0)={0}. Set R′:=max⁡{1/2,R0}<2 and K′:=B‾R′(0). This is a compact convex subset of UL containing the comparison trajectory. For the trajectory estimate take 0<ε≤ε∗ from Scaled trajectory limit: weak-field geodesics converge to the Newtonian system, with rate O(epsilon) for identical initial data. If (H1) holds, then Xε(S)∈B‾1/2(0)⊆K′ as well, so (H2) and (H3) hold with K2=1. With matched scaled initial data, the conclusion (ii) of the scaled trajectory theorem gives sup⁡[0,S∗]D(S)≤C3εS∗e2S∗=O(ε).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The flat model with inertial chart x, L>0, Ω=R×B2L(0), U=B2L(0), K=B‾L/2(0), C=1, ε0=1/16, the functions φ and r≡0 above, and c>0.

[L1]

The metric coefficients factor through U and are Lorentzian for 0<ε≤1/16: on U, 0≤φ<2, so 1−2εφ>3/4>0 and 1+2εφ>0. On K, ∣φ∣≤1/8, ∣∂iφ∣≤1/(2L) and ∣∂i∂jφ∣≤1/L2; r=0 satisfies the remainder bounds (Stationary weak-field data: the diagonal ansatz, its bounds, stationarity and the Einstein-family condition clause (a)).

[L2]

Under X↦LX, the chain rule gives ∂iψ(X)=L ∂iφ(LX) and D2ψ(X)=L2D2φ(LX); for the stated potential, ∇ψ(X)=X and D2ψ=I3 (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder).

[L3]

Sine and cosine derivatives and bounds: (cos⁡S)′=−sin⁡S, (sin⁡S)′=cos⁡S, and ∣cos⁡S∣,∣sin⁡S∣≤1 (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine).

[L4]

Closed Euclidean balls are compact and convex; for v,w in the closed ball of radius R′, ∣(1−t)v+tw∣≤(1−t)∣v∣+t∣w∣≤R′ for 0≤t≤1 (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn, For n≥1, every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact, A convex subset of Rm contains every line segment between two of its points, The inner-product norm is definite, homogeneous, and satisfies the triangle inequality).

[L5]

The scaled trajectory theorem requires K′⊆UL to be compact and convex, to contain every Xε(S) and the range of a C1 comparison solution, and to satisfy ∥D2ψ∥op≤K2 on K′; under (H1) and matched initial data it yields the stated O(ε) bound (Scaled trajectory limit: weak-field geodesics converge to the Newtonian system, with rate O(epsilon) for identical initial data).

[L6]

The norm ∥⋅∥2 is induced by the Euclidean inner product, the gradient is the coordinate vector of first partial derivatives, and for a totally differentiable map the total derivative has those partials as its coordinate entries (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian).

Verification

technique · verify the metric and derivative bounds on the stated spatial domain, solve the harmonic comparison system explicitly, and construct a compact convex subset of the scaled spatial domain containing both paths when (H1) holds
1.1L1L2L6algebra

(Data and scaled potential.) For every x∈U, the metric is diagonal with entries −(1+2εφ) and (1−2εφ)δij; by [L1] it is Lorentzian on Ω for 0<ε≤ε0. The spatial derivative bounds on K follow from [L1], so the tuple is stationary weak-field data. By [L2], ψ(X)=∣X∣2/2, ∇ψ(X)=X and D2ψ=I3 on UL=B2(0).

1.2L2L3algebra

(The comparison solution.) Define X∗,W∗ by the displayed formulas. Differentiating with [L3] gives X∗′=−sin⁡S X0+cos⁡S W0=W∗ and W∗′=−cos⁡S X0−sin⁡S W0=−X∗=−∇ψ(X∗) by [L2]. Since cos⁡0=1 and sin⁡0=0, the initial values are X∗(0)=X0 and W∗(0)=W0. These formulas are smooth on R; the range check below verifies that the position range stays in UL, where the comparison equation is defined.

1.3L2L3L4L5L6algebra

(Compact convex containing ball.) By [L3], ∣X∗(S)∣≤∣X0∣+∣W0∣=R0 for every S. Thus its range lies in B‾R′(0); by [L4] this is compact and convex. As R′<2, K′⊂UL. If (H1) holds, then ∣Xε(S)∣≤1/2 because xε(t)∈K=B‾L/2(0), so Xε(S)∈K′. Moreover ∥D2ψ∥op=1 on K′ by [L2]. Hence (H2)-(H3) hold with K2=1 under (H1).

2.1step 1.2step 1.3L5algebra∎

(Conclusion and limitation.) For 0<ε≤ε∗, if (H1) holds for the geodesic family with scaled initial data matching (X0,W0), then D(0)=0. The scaled theorem's conclusion (ii) gives sup⁡0≤S≤S∗D(S)≤C3εS∗e2S∗=O(ε). The example verifies the Newtonian trajectory and the domain hypotheses conditional on (H1); it asserts neither existence of such geodesics nor a physical orbit.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources