Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Formal nonnormalizable solution

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let g0(y)=π−1/4e−y2/2 (Hermite recurrence(a)) and define

F(y):=∫0yet2 dt,u2(y):=e−y2/2F(y)(y∈R).

Then:

(a) F is C1 with F′=ey2, and u2 is C2 and solves the ground-state eigenvalue equation

u2′′(y)=(y2−1)u2(y)(y∈R),

which is the equation (−∂y2+y2)u=u satisfied by g0 (Hermite orthogonality(b));

(b) the Wronskian is constant and nonzero,

W:=g0u2′−g0′u2=π−1/4,

so g0 and u2 are linearly independent solutions;

(c) u2∉L2(R,dy): for y≥1 one has ∣u2(y)∣2≥ey2−4y+2, which is not integrable, so ∫R∣u2∣2dy=+∞;

(d) every C2 function u:R→C (with complex smoothness and derivatives understood componentwise as in Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions) that belongs to L2(R,dy) and solves u′′=(y2−1)u is a constant multiple of g0: the quantity W(u):=g0u′−g0′u is constant for such u; if this constant is nonzero then u(y)=g0(y)(C+cπ1/2F(y)) for some constants with c≠0, which satisfies ∣u(y)∣≥Key2/2−2y+1 for some K>0 and all sufficiently large y, and is not in L2; hence the constant is zero and u/g0 is constant.

Thus u2 is the classical formal second solution of the ground-state equation, and its failure to be square-integrable is what forces the L2 eigenfunction to be the Gaussian.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: g0(y)=π−1/4e−y2/2, F(y)=∫0yet2dt, u2=e−y2/2F, and, in part (d), a componentwise C2 function u:R→C with u∈L2(R,dy).

[F2]

F(y)=∫0yet2 dt uses oriented limits (The integral with oriented limits: ∫aaf:=0 and ∫baf:=−∫abf). For each y0∈R, choose a<min⁡(0,y0) and b>max⁡(0,y0) and put G(x)=∫axet2 dt on [a,b]. Oriented additivity gives F(x)=G(x)−G(0) on this interval, and the first FTC applied to the continuous integrand gives F′(y0)=G′(y0)=ey02 (For a<c<b: f is integrable on [a,b] if and only if it is integrable on [a,c] and on [c,b], and then ∫abf=∫acf+∫cbf; with the oriented form for arbitrary a,b,c, The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F′(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive); hence F∈C1(R). For t∈R, et2≥e0=1 by strict increase and the defining series at zero (The exponential function is strictly increasing, The complex exponential by its power series), so F(y)≥y≥0 for y≥0.

[F5]

For every real x, ex>0 and e−x=1/ex (The exponential is positive and satisfies exp⁡(−x)=1/exp⁡(x)); the real exponential is strictly increasing (The exponential function is strictly increasing). The complex exponential extends the real one and satisfies ez+w=ezew for all z,w∈C (exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential).

[F3]

If G is differentiable with integrable derivative on [a,b], then ∫abG′=G(b)−G(a) (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)). If a nonnegative measurable h satisfies h≥1 on [a,∞) for some real a, then for every integer N≥1, 1[a,a+N]≤h; monotonicity of the nonnegative integral and the identity ∫1E dλ=λ(E) for indicators (from the simple-integral definition and its agreement with the nonnegative integral) give ∫h dλ≥λ([a,a+N])=N, so h is not integrable (The nonnegative Lebesgue integral, The integral of a nonnegative simple function, The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included).

[F4]

For a complex-valued function, C2 means its real and imaginary parts are C2, with derivatives taken componentwise (Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions).

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

[(a) the formal solution] By [F2], F∈C1 with F′=ey2, so u2 is C2 with, using the product rule and [F1], u2′=e−y2/2(F′−yF)=e−y2/2(ey2−yF) and u2′′=e−y2/2(2yey2−F−yF′−y(ey2−yF))=(y2−1)u2 because the ey2 terms cancel. Since (−∂y2+y2)g0=g0 by [F1], the equation u′′=(y2−1)u is exactly the ground-state eigenvalue equation.

1.2givenF2F3F5algebra

[(c) nonintegrability] For y≥1, F(y)=∫0yet2dt≥∫y−1yet2dt≥e(y−1)2 because t≥y−1≥0 on the interval and the exponential is increasing by [F5]. Hence ∣u2(y)∣2=e−y2F(y)2≥e−y2e2(y−1)2=ey2−4y+2 for y≥1; the lower bound exceeds 1 for y≥4, so [F3] implies ∫R∣u2∣2dy=+∞. Hence u2∉L2(R,dy).

2.1step 1.1F1F5algebra

[(b) the Wronskian] Using g0′=−yg0 from [F1] and the first formula of step 1.1, W=g0u2′−g0′u2=π−1/4e−y2/2⋅e−y2/2(ey2−yF)+yπ−1/4e−y2/2⋅e−y2/2F=π−1/4(1−yFe−y2+yFe−y2)=π−1/4, a nonzero constant; hence g0,u2 are linearly independent (if ag0+bu2=0, applying W(g0,v):=g0v′−g0′v gives bπ−1/4=0, hence b=0, and then a=0 because g0>0).

3.1step 1.1step 1.2F1F3F4F5algebra∎

[(d) all complex L2 solutions are multiples of g0] Let u:R→C be componentwise C2 by [F4] and solve u′′=(y2−1)u. Put W(u):=g0u′−g0′u. Applying the real product rule to the real and imaginary parts gives W(u)′=g0u′′−g0′′u=g0(y2−1)u−(y2−1)g0u=0 using [F1]. Applying [F3] to the real and imaginary parts on any finite interval gives W(u)(y)=W(u)(0)=c, so W(u) is constant. Since g0>0 on all of R, (u/g0)′=W(u)/g02=c/g02, and 1/g02=π1/2ey2 is continuous; applying [F3] separately to the real and imaginary parts and integrating from 0 to y gives u(y)=g0(y)(C+cπ1/2F(y)) for C=u(0)/g0(0). If c≠0, choose Y≥1 so large that ∣c∣πF(y)≥2∣C∣ for all y≥Y; such Y exists by step 1.2. The reverse triangle inequality gives ∣C+cπF(y)∣≥12∣c∣πF(y), hence for y≥Y, ∣u(y)∣≥12∣c∣π1/2g0(y)e(y−1)2=12∣c∣π1/4ey2/2−2y+1 by the lower bound on F, which tends to +∞; hence ∣u(y)∣2≥1 on some half-line [a,∞), and [F3] gives u∉L2. Therefore if u∈L2 then c=0 and u=Cg0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources