Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Constant noncommuting potentials with nonzero curvature

Example

Let M=R2 with coordinates (x,y), let G=SU(2), let P=M×G carry the right action (z,g)h=(z,gh), and take the admitted sector set to be Σ={[P]}. Use the defining representation ρ:SU(2)→U(C2,h) for the standard positive-definite Hermitian form h(v,w)=v∗w. With the Pauli matrices σ1=(0110), σ2=(0−ii0), and σ3=(100−1), set Ta=−i2σa∈su(2) and A=T1dx+T2dy. The form

ω(z,g)(X,ξ)=Ad⁡g−1Az(X)+(θL)g(ξ)

is a principal connection form whose canonical-section potential is A. Its curvature is F=T3 dx∧dy. On the associated bundle with fibre C2, every smooth section represented by ψ:M→C2 has ∇∂xψ=(∂x+T1)ψ and ∇∂yψ=(∂y+T2)ψ; the commutator operator is [∇∂x,∇∂y]=T3. Thus the exterior-derivative part of the curvature vanishes, while its nonzero value is the Lie-bracket contribution.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, M=R2, the right-principal product bundle P=M×SU(2), its defining representation, and the constant potential A=T1dx+T2dy.

[A1]

A non-Abelian gauge datum uses a compact noncommutative Lie group, a smooth right principal bundle, and specified unitary representations. Non-Abelian gauge data and bundle sectors

[A2]

ACω is the axiom of countable choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

SU(2) is a finite-dimensional Lie group with tangent Lie algebra given by the traceless anti-Hermitian matrices. Unitary and special unitary Lie groups

[F3]

A right-principal connection form reproduces fundamental vectors, is right-equivariant, and determines its horizontal kernel. Principal connection 1-form from a horizontal distribution

[F4]

The graded bracket convention gives 12[A∧A](X,Y)=[A(X),A(Y)] for a Lie-algebra-valued 1-form. Graded bracket of Lie-algebra-valued differential forms

[F5]

The local Cartan curvature is F=dA+12[A∧A]. Principal curvature, Cartan structure equation, and Bianchi identity

[F6]

For SU(2), su(2) consists of traceless anti-Hermitian matrices, and the defining inclusion is unitary. Unitary and special unitary Lie groups

[F7]

In a local section of the associated bundle, ∇ψ=dψ+ρ∗(A)ψ. Covariant derivative on an associated representation bundle

[F8]

The left Maurer–Cartan form is smooth and for matrices is (θL)g(ξ)=g−1ξ. Left Maurer--Cartan form

[F9]

The adjoint maps obey Ad⁡gh=Ad⁡gAd⁡h. Adjoint is a smooth Lie-group representation

[F10]

A smooth principal bundle has a smooth projection and right action and equivariant local product charts. Smooth principal G-bundle

Verification

1.1A1A2F1F2F6algebra

Regard M2(C) as R8. The conditions g∗g=I and det⁡g=1 defining SU(2) are closed equations in the matrix entries, so SU(2) is closed. Each column of a unitary matrix has norm one, hence all entries have modulus at most one, so SU(2) is bounded. By [F2], it is compact. The matrices D=(i00−i) and J=(01−10) are unitary with determinant one, but DJ=(0ii0)≠(0−i−i0)=JD. Thus SU(2) is noncommutative, and [F1] supplies its Lie-group structure. This verifies the group conditions in [A1]. The declared axiom base is ACω by [A2], while [F2] uses no choice. Each Pauli matrix is Hermitian and traceless, so each Ta is anti-Hermitian and traceless; [F6] puts them in su(2). Direct multiplication gives σ1σ2=iσ3 and σ2σ1=−iσ3, hence [T1,T2]=(−i/2)2[σ1,σ2]=−(1/4)(2iσ3)=T3. Since T3≠0, this also verifies that T1 and T2 do not commute.

2.1F3F8F9F10step 1.1algebra

The product P=M×SU(2) with right multiplication on its second coordinate is smooth, free, and transitive on each fibre, and the product chart is equivariant; [F10] therefore makes it a smooth right principal bundle. By [F8], the displayed ω is smooth. A fundamental vertical vector generated by Z∈su(2) at (z,g) is (0,gZ), and (θL)g(gZ)=Z, so ω(ZP)=Z. For a fixed h∈SU(2), the right-translated tangent is (X,ξh); [F8] gives (θL)gh(ξh)=h−1(θL)g(ξ)h=Ad⁡h−1((θL)g(ξ)), and [F9] gives Ad⁡(gh)−1=Ad⁡h−1Ad⁡g−1. Therefore ω(z,gh)(X,ξh)=Ad⁡h−1ω(z,g)(X,ξ). Together with reproduction, [F3] shows it is a principal connection form. Its pullback along s(z)=(z,e) is A.

2.2F4F5step 1.1

The coefficients of A are constant, so dA=0. Evaluating the bracket on (∂x,∂y), [F4] gives 12[A∧A](∂x,∂y)=[T1,T2]=T3 by step 1.1. Since a 2-form on R2 is determined by this value on the coordinate basis, F=T3dx∧dy.

3.1F5F7step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

For the defining representation, the differential ρ∗ sends each tangent matrix T∈su(2) to the same endomorphism T of C2, since ρ is the matrix inclusion. Applying [F7] to a smooth ψ:M→C2 gives the two displayed covariant derivatives. The constant matrices commute with the coordinate derivatives, and ∂x∂yψ=∂y∂xψ; expansion gives [∇∂x,∇∂y]ψ=(T1T2−T2T1)ψ=T3ψ. This verifies the stated operator commutator for every smooth section in the global trivialization.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources