Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Entropy increase in an idealized adiabatic compression

Physical scope

A conditional one-mole monatomic ideal-gas model with positive initial temperature and volume, a sudden constant-load compression to a stated final volume, dissipative settling, and no empirical claim.

Example

This is a conditional model calculation, not a report of an observed compression. The gas is taken to have one mole, n=1 mol, of a model whose state variables are a positive temperature T in kelvins, volume V in cubic metres, and uniform pressure p in pascals. The model is monatomic and ideal in the explicit sense that its molar constant-volume heat capacity is CV=3R/2, its internal energy is U=nCVT, and its equation of state is pV=nRT. Its entropy difference is

S(T,V)−S(T0,V0)=nCVln⁡(T/T0)+nRln⁡(V/V0),

for positive reference values T0 in K and V0 in m3. At initial equilibrium let Ti>0 and Vi>0. A piston protocol suddenly raises the external pressure from the initial value pi to a constant final load pf, compresses the gas adiabatically to Vf=(9/10)Vi, and dissipatively settles it to a final equilibrium state. The protocol admits no reverse record, so it is irreversible by Reversible thermodynamic process record. The idealization assumes no change in the included load's entropy; all numerical behavior is a model assumption and deduction, not an empirical measurement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The process and sign conventions of Thermodynamic process records and transfer conventions, the closed-record first-law postulate First-law energy balance for closed process records, and the stated ideal-gas model.

[F1]

A process record is adiabatic exactly when HPin(t)=HPout(t)=0 for every t∈IP: no thermal energy crosses its selected outer boundary throughout the record. This implies Q[P]=0; Won>0 denotes work done on the system (Thermodynamic process records and transfer conventions).

[F2]

For every admitted closed record in the stated class, U(xP+)−U(xP−)=Q[P]+Won[P] (First-law energy balance for closed process records).

[F3]

The adopted entropy is a finite scalar state function with values measured in J K−1 (Concave macroscopic fundamental entropy).

[L1]

log⁡ is strictly increasing, log⁡1=0, and log⁡(xy)=log⁡x+log⁡y for positive x,y (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

[A1]

The ideal-gas equations and entropy difference are exactly those stated in the Example; R>0 has units J mol−1 K−1 and CV=3R/2.

[A2]

The gas is the system inside the declared outer boundary: no matter crosses it, its material constitution is fixed, and its mechanical model supplies a total mass M>0 and center-of-mass velocities in the fixed chart of Thermodynamic process records and transfer conventions. The gas center of mass is at rest at both endpoint preparations, so ΔKcm=0; no separately tracked external-field potential energy changes (the model may take that term to be absent), so ΔUext=0. Thus the admitted record is in Pcl(s) as defined by Thermodynamic process records and transfer conventions. Its protocol has HPin(t)=HPout(t)=0 for every t∈IP, hence Q[P]=0, a constant external load pf during compression, and Won[P]=pf(Vi−Vf). The final equilibrium obeys pfVf=nRTf, and the initial equilibrium obeys piVi=nRTi. The apparatus is stipulated to dissipatively settle and to have zero entropy change.

Verification

Given: n=1 mol, Vf/Vi=9/10, the premises [F1]–[F3], the logarithm laws [L1], and the model/protocol assumptions [A1]–[A2].

1.1givenF1F2A1A2algebra

Put λ:=pf/pi. The equilibrium equations give Tf/Ti=λ(9/10). The first-law balance gives nCV(Tf−Ti)=pf(Vi−Vf), hence (3/2)(λ(9/10)−1)=λ(1/10). Solving yields λ=6/5 and Tf/Ti=27/25.

2.1givenF3L1A1step 1.1algebra∎

The entropy difference is therefore ΔS=nR[(3/2)ln⁡(27/25)+ln⁡(9/10)]. By [L1], 2ΔS/(nR)=ln⁡ ⁣((27/25)3(9/10)2)=ln⁡(1594323/1562500)>0, since 1594323>1562500 and log⁡ is strictly increasing with log⁡1=0. Since nR>0, ΔS>0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources