Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unconstrained massless periodic Gaussian has infinite normalizer

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω. Let d,L≥1 be integers, let Λd,L=(Z/LZ)d have N=Ld sites, and let κ>0. Define the zero-mass precision K:=κ(−Δ) on RΛd,L, with the periodic Laplacian convention of Fourier spectrum and positivity of the periodic lattice Laplacian. Then the unrestricted Lebesgue normalizer diverges:

∫RΛd,Lexp⁡ ⁣(−12zTKz) dλN(z)=+∞.

Thus this quadratic weight does not define a probability density on the full coordinate space. A finite-volume massless Gaussian must first restrict the field, for example to {z:∑x∈Λd,Lzx=0}, before inverting the Laplacian.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, integers d,L≥1, the periodic site set Λd,L with N=Ld, and κ>0.

[F1]

The periodic operator −Δ is real symmetric and annihilates the constant vector 1; the r=0 function χ0(x)=1 for every x is that constant vector (Fourier spectrum and positivity of the periodic lattice Laplacian).

[F2]

Under ACω, a C1 diffeomorphism changes a nonnegative Lebesgue integral by its absolute Jacobian (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F3]

Euclidean Lebesgue measure is the product of its coordinate measures on Borel rectangles; the coordinate measures are sigma-finite, and Tonelli identifies the integral of a nonnegative measurable function with its iterated integral (Lebesgue measurable sets, the family L(Rn), and the restricted set function λn, The nonnegative Lebesgue integral, On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F4]

Boxes have their side-length product as Lebesgue measure, and increasing nonnegative functions pass to their limit under the integral (A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included, Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F5]

The nonnegative Lebesgue integral is monotone (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

By [F1], K1=0 and K is symmetric. Hence the quadratic form is unchanged by adding any constant multiple of 1: for every z and t∈R, (z+t1)TK(z+t1)=zTKz.

2.1givenF4F5step 1.1algebra

If N=1, then K=0 by step 1.1, and the integrand is identically 1 on R. Its integral is infinite because the intervals [−M,M] have measure 2M for every integer M≥1 by [F4], and [F5] bounds the full integral below by each of these unbounded values.

2.2givenF2step 1.1algebra

Suppose N≥2 and enumerate the lattice sites as x1,…,xN. Define the linear map T:RN−1×R→RN by T(w,t)=(w1+t,…,wN−1+t,t). Its matrix is triangular with all diagonal entries 1, so it is a C1 diffeomorphism with determinant 1. For w~=(w1,…,wN−1,0), one has T(w,t)=w~+t1. By step 1.1, T(w,t)TKT(w,t)=w~TKw~, which is independent of t. Applying [F2] changes the original integral to ∫RN−1×Rf(w) dλN(w,t),f(w):=exp⁡ ⁣(−12w~TKw~).

3.1F3F4F5step 2.2algebra∎

The function f is continuous and positive. On [−1,1]N−1, ∣w~TKw~∣≤M, where M:=∑i,j=1N−1∣Kij∣<∞; hence f(w)≥e−M/2 there. By [F4] and [F5], ∫RN−1f(w) dλN−1(w)≥2N−1e−M/2>0. By [F3], Tonelli factors the nonnegative integral in step 2.2 as ∫f(w) dw∫R1 dt. The second factor is infinite because each interval [−M′,M′] has measure 2M′ for integer M′≥1 by [F4], and [F5] bounds the full-line integral below by each such value. Thus the original normalizer is infinite, proving the claim.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources