Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Localization of a continuous function by axis-parallel cube integrals

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω, the ambient convention under which the Lebesgue measure and integration interface used below is stated (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let n≥1, let U⊆Rn be open, and let g:U→R be continuous.

For a closed axis-parallel cube Q=∏i<n[ai,ai+ℓ]⊆U with ℓ>0, the restriction g∣Q is continuous on the compact nondegenerate rectangle Q, hence bounded and Borel and Riemann integrable; denote by ∫Qg dλn the Lebesgue integral of g over Q with respect to the restriction of Lebesgue measure, which by the comparison of the Riemann and Lebesgue integrals equals the Riemann integral of g over Q. Suppose that

∫Qg dλn=0

for every closed axis-parallel cube Q⊆U with side ℓ>0. Then g=0 on U.

In particular, for n=2, a continuous function on an open subset of the plane whose integral over every closed axis-parallel square contained in its domain vanishes is identically zero.

The hypothesis requires every closed axis-parallel cube, with every centre and every positive side length. A single cube does not suffice, and neither do the cubes centred at one fixed point: on U=Rn the nonzero continuous function g(x)=x0−p0 has ∫Qg dλn=0 for every closed cube Q centred at p, by cancellation in its first coordinate. This family also differs from the family of closed cubes that merely contain p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω. A natural number n≥1, an open set U⊆Rn, a continuous g:U→R, and the hypothesis that ∫Qg dλn=0 for every closed axis-parallel cube Q⊆U of positive side length, the integral being interpreted as in the Statement. Throughout, Rn carries the Euclidean metric d2 (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn) and subsets carry the subspace metric (Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset).

[F1]

U is open: for every x∈U there is a real r>0 with B(x,r)⊆U (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space). The map g is continuous, that is, continuous at every point of U: for every a∈U and every ε>0 there is a real δ>0 such that ∣g(x)−g(a)∣<ε for every x∈U with d2(x,a)<δ (Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the ε-δ form).

[F2]

For n≥1 the Euclidean metric is d2(x,y)=∑i<n(xi−yi)2 (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn).

[F3]

For reals ai≤bi the box { x∈Rn:ai≤xi≤bi for every i<n } is a compact subset of (Rn,d2) (Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line).

[F4]

A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).

[F5]

Every set R with R∘⊆R⊆R‾ determined by reals ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable with λn(R)=∏i<n(bi−ai); in particular a closed cube of side ℓ>0 has measure ℓn>0 (A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included).

[F6]

A continuous map between topological spaces has Borel preimages of Borel sets (A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets).

[F7]

Every continuous real function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle Q⊆Rm, m≥1, is Riemann integrable (Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable).

[F8]

Assume ACω. For m≥1 and reals ai<bi, if a bounded Borel real function f on the box Q=∏i<m[ai,bi] is Riemann integrable, then f is Lebesgue integrable on Q and its Lebesgue and Riemann integrals agree (Riemann–Lebesgue comparison for distribution test integrands).

[F9]

For integrable f≤h on a nondegenerate rectangle the Riemann integrals satisfy ∫Qf≤∫Qh, and Riemann integrals are linear in the integrand (Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm).

[F10]

Lower and upper Darboux sums of a bounded f over a grid P are L(f,P)=∑imivol⁡(Qi) and U(f,P)=∑iMivol⁡(Qi), with mi=inf⁡f[Qi] and Mi=sup⁡f[Qi]; the cells Qi of a grid partition have ∑ivol⁡(Qi)=vol⁡(Q); and the Darboux integrals are the suprema and infima of these sums, the function being Riemann integrable when they agree (Lower and upper Darboux sums over a grid partition in Rm, Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm, their cells, refinements and mesh, The lower and upper Darboux integrals over a nondegenerate rectangle in Rm).

[F11]

If a grid P′ refines a grid P, then L(f,P)≤L(f,P′)≤U(f,P′)≤U(f,P) (Refinement raises multidimensional lower sums and lowers upper sums, with a quantitative boundary-slab estimate).

[F12]

For every real η>0 there is a natural number k≥1 with 1/k<η (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

Proof

1.1givenF8F9algebra

Suppose that g(p)≠0 for some p∈U. Replacing g by −g if necessary, assume g(p)>0: the replacement preserves the hypothesis, because for every admissible cube the two Riemann integrals satisfy ∫Q(−g)=−∫Qg and the Lebesgue integrals equal them by [F8], so ∫Q(−g) dλn=−∫Qg dλn=0, and it preserves the conclusion g=0; both g and −g are continuous.

1.2F1F2choosealgebra

By continuity of g at p with ε=g(p)/2>0 there is δ1>0 with ∣g(x)−g(p)∣<g(p)/2 for every x∈U with d2(x,p)<δ1; by openness of U there is δ2>0 with B(p,δ2)⊆U. Put δ:=min⁡{δ1,δ2}>0 and ℓ:=δ/n>0, and consider the closed axis-parallel cube Q:=∏i<n[pi−ℓ/2, pi+ℓ/2]. For x∈Q we have d2(x,p)2=∑i<n(xi−pi)2≤n(ℓ/2)2=δ2/4, so d2(x,p)≤δ/2<δ≤δ1 and x∈B(p,δ2)⊆U; thus Q⊆U and g(x)>g(p)−g(p)/2=g(p)/2 for every x∈Q.

1.3F2F10constructalgebra

It remains to verify the sharpness clause. Fix p∈Rn, put a=ℓ/2>0 and Q=∏i<n[pi−a,pi+a], and let h(x)=x0−p0 on Rn. Let Φ(x):=(2p0−x0,x1,…,xn−1); then Φ maps Q onto Q, Φ∘Φ is the identity, and for each cell A of a grid whose first-coordinate partition is symmetric about p0 the mirror cell Φ(A) has vol⁡(Φ(A))=vol⁡(A), inf⁡h[Φ(A)]=−sup⁡h[A] and sup⁡h[Φ(A)]=−inf⁡h[A].

2.1F3F4F5F6F7F8step 1.2

The set Q is a nonempty compact subset of Rn and the restriction g∣Q is continuous for the subspace metric, so it is bounded and attains its extrema; its Borel measurability is [F6] applied to the continuous map g∣Q, and continuity on the closed nondegenerate rectangle gives Riemann integrability. By [F8] the Lebesgue integral ∫Qg dλn exists and equals the Riemann integral of g∣Q, and by [F5] λn(Q)=ℓn>0.

2.2F5F8F10step 1.2algebra

The constant c:=g(p)/2>0 has Riemann integral c ℓn over Q: for every grid P of Q every cell satisfies mi=Mi=c, so L(c,P)=U(c,P)=c∑ivol⁡(Qi)=cvol⁡(Q)=c ℓn by [F10]; hence the Darboux integrals of c equal c ℓn, the function is Riemann integrable, and by [F8] its Lebesgue integral over Q is c ℓn>0.

2.3F10F11step 1.3algebra

Let P be any grid of Q and let P′′ be the grid with first-coordinate partition the union of the first-coordinate breakpoints of P with their reflections t↦2p0−t, and with the remaining coordinate partitions those of P; then P′′ refines P and its first-coordinate partition is symmetric about p0, so its cells fall into mirror pairs and self-mirrored cells, and summing the identities of step 1.3 over those classes gives L(h,P′′)=−U(h,P′′), whence L(h,P′′)≤0≤U(h,P′′); by [F11], L(h,P)≤L(h,P′′)≤0 and U(h,P)≥U(h,P′′)≥0 for every grid P.

3.1step 2.2step 1.2step 2.1F9givencontradiction

Since g(x)>c for every x∈Q by step 1.2 and both g∣Q and the constant c are Riemann integrable on Q, monotonicity [F9] gives ∫Qg dλn≥c ℓn>0, where step 2.1 identifies the Lebesgue integral of g with its Riemann integral and step 2.2 evaluates the constant. This contradicts the hypothesis ∫Qg dλn=0 for the admissible cube Q⊆U constructed in step 1.2. Hence g(p)=0 for every p∈U, and the planar clause is the case n=2.

3.2F7F8F12step 2.3algebra

For each integer m≥1 let Pm be the grid with first-coordinate breakpoints p0+ka/m for −m≤k≤m and single intervals of length 2a in the remaining coordinates. Its first-coordinate partition is symmetric about p0, so L(h,Pm)=−U(h,Pm) by step 2.3, and direct summation over the 2m cells of first-coordinate length a/m gives L(h,Pm)=−U(h,Pm)=−a2(2a)n−1/m, a quantity tending to 0; hence sup⁡PL(h,P)≥L(h,Pm) for every m forces sup⁡PL(h,P)≥0, and together with step 2.3 this gives sup⁡PL(h,P)=0, while inf⁡PU(h,P)=0 likewise. Therefore h is Riemann integrable over Q with ∫Qh=0, and by [F8], using that h∣Q is continuous hence bounded and Borel, the Lebesgue integral is ∫Qh dλn=0.

4.1givenstep 3.2step 3.1∎

The function g(x)=x0−p0 is continuous and nonzero on Rn, and step 3.2 shows ∫Qg dλn=0 for the cube Q of step 1.3 centred at p; every closed cube centred at p is of that form, so the family of cubes with the single centre p does not satisfy the localizing hypothesis although g≠0, and a single cube plainly cannot either. Thus the all-cubes hypothesis of the Statement is exactly what the argument of steps 1.1-3.2 uses.

Source notes

The localization statement is standard: a continuous function that is orthogonal to every axis-parallel cube integral vanishes. The proof above is written in the library's own measure and Darboux interfaces, using the multidimensional Darboux integral of The lower and upper Darboux integrals over a nondegenerate rectangle in Rm and the comparison with the Lebesgue integral of Riemann–Lebesgue comparison for distribution test integrands; the sharpness witness is the coordinate-cancellation computation, proved directly by mirror-symmetric grid refinements rather than by a separate symmetry or change-of-variables theorem.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources