Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The piecewise constant cylinder field e31{ρ<a}: distributional curl on the cylinder

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (ACω), with the exact meaning of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). Let a>0, write x=(x1,x2,x3) and ρ=x12+x22, let S:={x∈R3:ρ=a} be the circular cylinder of radius a about the third coordinate axis, with unit normal eρ=ρ−1(x1,x2,0) pointing from the interior region {ρ<a} to the exterior region {ρ>a}, and let eφ=ρ−1(−x2,x1,0) and e3=(0,0,1). Let g:R3→R3 be the piecewise constant field g(x):={e3,ρ<a,0,ρ>a, extended arbitrarily on the three-dimensional Lebesgue-null set S, and let Tg be its regular distribution (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions). For an R3-valued distribution T=(T1,T2,T3) whose components are scalar distributions of Distribution, a scalar test φ∈Cc∞(R3) and a vector test ψ∈Cc∞(R3;R3), the pairings used below are the componentwise readings of Distributional derivative: ⟨div⁡T,φ⟩:=−∑i=13⟨Ti,∂iφ⟩,⟨curl⁡T,ψ⟩:=∑i=13⟨Ti,(curl⁡ψ)i⟩. Then for every vector test ψ and every scalar test φ, ⟨curl⁡Tg,ψ⟩=∫Seφ⋅ψ dS,⟨div⁡Tg,φ⟩=0, that is, curl⁡Tg=eφ δS and div⁡Tg=0 in the distributional sense of Distributional derivative. The surface integral is that of Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces; since ψ has compact support it equals the integral over any compact cylinder segment containing supp⁡ψ∩S. Equivalently, with g± the one-sided values and the normal eρ from the minus to the plus side, g+−g−=−e3, eρ×(g+−g−)=eφ and eρ⋅(g+−g−)=0. No product of distributions is formed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω; let a>0; let ψ∈Cc∞(R3;R3) and φ∈Cc∞(R3); let S, eρ, eφ, e3, g and Tg be as in the Statement.

[F1]

Cc∞(R3) and its finite componentwise variant Cc∞(R3;R3) are the test spaces of Test function space d of an open set: their members are smooth and compactly supported, and every pairing below is against such a test.

[F2]

The regular distribution Th of a locally integrable function acts by ⟨Th,χ⟩=∫h χ and depends only on the almost-everywhere class of h; locally integrable functions embed into distributions (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions).

[F3]

Distributional derivatives act by signed differentiation of the test, ⟨∂αu,χ⟩=(−1)∣α∣⟨u,∂αχ⟩ (Distributional derivative), and a vector distribution is a triple of scalar distributions in D′(R3) (Distribution).

[F4]

Under ACω, Tonelli applies to the σ-finite Euclidean Lebesgue products; λm×λn agrees with λm+n on Borel sets for m,n≥1, and every finite subset of R is λ1-null (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}, Every at most countable subset of Rn is Lebesgue null; in particular λ1(Q)=0).

[F5]

Assuming ACω, Lebesgue measure is finite on every bounded Lebesgue measurable set, so a bounded Borel function on R3 is locally integrable (Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure). Lebesgue measure is complete (Assuming countable choice, L(Rn) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λn is a complete measure extending elementary volume); hence arbitrary finite changes of a measurable function on a null set remain measurable, because each changed preimage differs by a subset of that null set.

[F6]

The cylinder V={ρ<a, ∣x3∣<R}, R>a, has the finite piecewise C1 presentation of Specified finite piecewise C1 boundary presentations given by the two planar disc caps and four lateral faces X([jπ/2,(j+1)π/2]×[−R,R]), j=0,1,2,3, where X(θ,z)=(acos⁡θ,asin⁡θ,z). Each angular interval lies inside an open interval of length less than 2π, on which X is an injective regular chart of Gram density a. The edge set consists of the four vertical seams and the two rim circles. In a lateral chart these have parameter sets contained in finitely many horizontal or vertical lines, which are planar-null by [F4], so the edges are surface-null; they are null in each planar cap as well, by applying [F4] to the at-most-two-point sections of its rim circle. The actual outward normals are eρ on the lateral faces and ±e3 on the caps.

[F7]

Under that presentation the divergence theorem of Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations holds: for every C1 field F on a neighborhood of the compact closure V‾, ∫Vdiv⁡F dλ3=∑j∫SjF⋅νj dS, each face counted once off the edge set.

[F8]

For u=(ux,uy,uz) and v=(vx,vy,vz) one has u×v=(uyvz−uzvy, uzvx−uxvz, uxvy−uyvx); in particular A×e3=(A2,−A1,0), e3×eρ=eφ, (ψ×e3)⋅eρ=ψ⋅eφ, eρ×(−e3)=eφ and eρ⋅(−e3)=0 (The cross product in R3).

[F9]

On a C1 field F the operators are div⁡F=∂1F1+∂2F2+∂3F3 and curl⁡F=(∂2F3−∂3F2, ∂3F1−∂1F3, ∂1F2−∂2F1) (Divergence and curl of a C1 vector field).

[F10]

The surface integral over a compact Borel face contained in a regular patch of a compactly supported integrand is the chart-defined integral of Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, and it does not depend on the choice of a larger compact band containing the support of the integrand.

[F11]

ACω is the countable-choice principle invoked by the measure, surface and distribution interfaces above (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct; the nullity of the cylinder surface, the divergence theorem on the cylinder, and two coordinate computations
1.1givenF4

The cylinder S={x:x12+x22=a2} is closed, hence Borel. For each (x2,x3)∈R2, its section S(x2,x3):={x1∈R:(x1,x2,x3)∈S} consists of at most the two values ±a2−x22 when ∣x2∣≤a, and is empty otherwise. Each section is λ1-null by [F4]. Tonelli and product-measure agreement [F4] give λ3(S)=∫R2λ1(S(x2,x3)) dλ2=0.

2.1givenF1F2F3F5step 1.1

The bounded Borel function g0:=e31{ρ<a} agrees with g off the null set S of step 1.1, so completeness [F5] makes g Lebesgue measurable with the same almost-everywhere class as g0; by [F5] this class is locally integrable. Hence Tg:=Tg0 is a well-defined distribution by [F2], and for the tests of [F1] the componentwise pairings of [F3] read ⟨curl⁡Tg,ψ⟩=∫R3g0⋅curl⁡ψ dλ3 and ⟨div⁡Tg,φ⟩=−∫R3g0⋅∇φ dλ3, where the componentwise sums against the vector tests are the ordinary finite sums of the stated integrals.

3.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1

Choose R>a with supp⁡ψ∪supp⁡φ⊂W:={ρ<R, ∣x3∣<R} and put V:={ρ<a, ∣x3∣<R}. Since curl⁡ψ and ∇φ are supported in W, and g0 equals e3 on V, equals 0 on the open set W∖V‾, and the remaining part W∩∂V lies in the null set S of step 1.1, the two integrals of step 2.1 reduce to integrals over V: ∫R3g0⋅curl⁡ψ dλ3=∫Ve3⋅curl⁡ψ dλ3 and ∫R3g0⋅∇φ dλ3=∫Ve3⋅∇φ dλ3.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F6F7F8F9

The field F0:=φe3 is C1 on R3, hence on a neighborhood of V‾, and by [F9] its divergence is div⁡F0=∂3φ=e3⋅∇φ. The divergence theorem [F7] on the presentation [F6] gives ∫Ve3⋅∇φ dλ3=∫∂Vφ e3⋅ν dS. On the lateral face ν=eρ and e3⋅eρ=0 by [F8]; on the two disc caps x3=±R the test φ vanishes because supp⁡φ⊂{∣x3∣<R}; hence ∫Ve3⋅∇φ dλ3=0. With steps 2.1 and 3.1 this proves ⟨div⁡Tg,φ⟩=0 for every scalar test.

4.2step 2.1step 3.1F6F7F8F9F10

The field G0:=ψ×e3 is C1 on R3, and by [F8] its coordinates are G0=(ψ2,−ψ1,0), so by [F9] div⁡G0=∂1ψ2−∂2ψ1=(curl⁡ψ)3=e3⋅curl⁡ψ. The divergence theorem [F7] on the presentation [F6] gives ∫Ve3⋅curl⁡ψ dλ3=∫∂VG0⋅ν dS. The disc caps carry ψ=0 by the support condition, while on the lateral face ν=eρ and G0⋅eρ=(ψ×e3)⋅eρ=ψ⋅eφ by [F8]; therefore ∫Ve3⋅curl⁡ψ dλ3=∫ρ=a, ∣x3∣<Reφ⋅ψ dS, and by [F10] the last integral equals ∫Seφ⋅ψ dS because eφ⋅ψ is compactly supported and vanishes off the compact band {ρ=a, ∣x3∣≤R}. With steps 2.1 and 3.1 this is ⟨curl⁡Tg,ψ⟩=∫Seφ⋅ψ dS for every vector test, which is the claimed identification curl⁡Tg=eφ δS.

5.1step 4.1step 4.2F2F4F8F10F11∎

The one-sided values of g across S are g+=0 and g−=e3, so g+−g−=−e3 and, by [F8], eρ×(g+−g−)=eρ×(−e3)=eφ and eρ⋅(g+−g−)=eρ⋅(−e3)=0, which is the stated equivalence. The two distributional identities of steps 4.1 and 4.2 involve only integrals of locally integrable functions against smooth tests, so no product of two distributions is formed anywhere; the only multiplication on S is that of the compactly supported function eφ⋅ψ with the surface measure of [F10]. Countable Choice is used in step 1.1 through the product-measure and finite-null-set suppliers [F4] and is inherited only through the cited measure, surface and distribution interfaces [F11]; no stronger choice principle occurs.

Source notes

Tong, Section 3.1.2, printed pp. 43-46, and Chew, Lecture 4 Section 4.3.3, printed pp. 46-48, present the current-sheet jump with exactly the pillbox bookkeeping carried out above at the distributional level; Griffiths, Section 5.3.3, printed pp. 226-228, computes the uniform-surface-current and infinite-solenoid fields whose interface content this lemma records as the identity curl⁡Tg=eφδS. The lemma itself is a pure distributional computation on the declared piecewise constant field and uses no physical assumption.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources