Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rectangular PEC reflection class: Fourier completeness, weak solutions and energy conservation

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let Q=∏j=13(0,Lj) with Lj>0 and let ε,μ>0 be constants. Define the reflection boundary class by extending E1 evenly across the x1-walls and oddly across the x2,x3-walls, and cyclically for E2,E3; extend B1 oddly across x1 and evenly across x2,x3, cyclically for B2,B3. Work on the rectangular torus ∏jR/(2LjZ) in the real L2 fields with these parities and distributional div⁡E=div⁡B=0. For smooth fields the parity class gives n×E=0 and n⋅B=0 on ∂Q. Then: (i) the finite separated Fourier modes are dense in this class, and the class is complete for the L2 pairing (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases); (ii) for every initial datum in the class there is a unique C(R;L2) weak solution of ∂tE=(εμ)−1curl⁡B, ∂tB=−curl⁡E in the same class (Distributional derivative); (iii) the energy 12∫Q(ε∣E∣2+∣B∣2/μ) dx is constant along the solution. This is an explicit weak PEC model; it supplies neither trace regularity for arbitrary H(curl⁡) fields nor completeness in lossy, open or non-rectangular guides.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive constants L1,L2,L3,ε,μ; the box Q=(0,L1)×(0,L2)×(0,L3); the torus T:=R/(2L1Z)×R/(2L2Z)×R/(2L3Z) with its normalized product measure ν and the complex Hilbert space L2(T;C) of L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space; and the parity conventions of the statement.

[L1]

Torus characters and Fourier expansion. Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Under the scaling identification of R/(2LjZ) with the unit-period torus, the characters xj↦eiπnjxj/Lj, nj∈Z, form an orthonormal basis of the one-dimensional complex L2 space (The trigonometric system is complete in L2 of the torus, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases), and the Fourier partial sums converge in mean square (Fourier series converge in mean square). Hence the product characters Φn(x):=∏j=13eiπnjxj/Lj, n∈Z3, form an orthonormal basis of L2(T;C) and Parseval's identity holds for every f in that space.

[L2]

Product integration. Fubini and Tonelli for σ-finite product spaces (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product) permit iterated integration and interchange of the order of integration for nonnegative and integrable functions, and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality of Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2 bounds L2 pairings by the product of the norms.

[L3]

Ordinary differential equations. Every initial-value problem z′=F(t,z) with continuous globally state-Lipschitz F has a unique global solution (A globally state-Lipschitz vector field on R×Rn has global solutions); the maximal-solution theorem (Every Picard–Lindelöf initial value problem has one maximal solution on an open interval) is the local existence and uniqueness input.

[L4]

Distributional derivatives. The distributional derivative is defined by ⟨∂αu,φ⟩=(−1)∣α∣⟨u,∂αφ⟩ (Distributional derivative), and distributional differentiation commutes; a Ck function is a regular distribution whose distributional derivatives are its classical ones (Distributional differentiation is continuous and commutes). A distribution on the connected open set R with all first derivatives zero is a constant (A distribution with zero derivatives on a connected open set is constant). Moreover continuous functions on compact intervals are Riemann integrable (A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion), their oriented integral functions are C1 with the integrand as derivative (The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F′(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive), and a differentiable function with integrable derivative is recovered from its derivative (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)).

Proof

Use the coordinate cross product of The cross product in R3 and the coordinate divergence and curl of Divergence and curl of a C1 vector field, extended distributionally by [L4]. Throughout, "the class" means the closed subspace C⊆L2(T;R3)×L2(T;R3) of pairs (E,B) that are real vector fields with the parity patterns of the statement and satisfy div⁡E=div⁡B=0 in the distributional sense. For these parities, the squared magnitudes are even in each coordinate, so ∫Q∣E∣2=L1L2L3∫T∣E∣2dν, and likewise for B; this fixed positive norm conversion shows that preservation of ε∥E∥2+∥B∥2/μ is equivalent to (iii).

1.1L1L4

A smooth field on R3 satisfying the parity pattern of the statement restricts to Q as a tangential-electric and normal-magnetic perfect-conductor field: at the wall x1=0 (and x1=L1), E1 is even in x1 while E2,E3 are odd, so E2=E3=0 there, which is n×E=0; B1 is odd and B2,B3 even, so B1=0 there, which is n⋅B=0; the cyclic coordinates are identical. The parity conditions are closed linear conditions in L2(T;R3) because a sign change of a torus coordinate preserves L2 convergence and distributional derivatives, and div⁡E=0 is the closed condition ∫E⋅∇φ dν=0 for every smooth periodic scalar test φ, and likewise for B, so C is a closed real subspace of the Hilbert space L2(T;R3)2. The weak formulation used below is: (E,B)∈C(R;C) is a weak solution when for every pair of smooth periodic vector fields Ψ,Θ compactly supported in t, ∬E⋅∂tΨ dν dt+(εμ)−1∬B⋅curl⁡Ψ dν dt=0 and ∬B⋅∂tΘ dν dt−∬E⋅curl⁡Θ dν dt=0, which is exactly the statement that the two equations hold for ∂t and curl⁡ in the sense of Distributional derivative (the spatial sign convention in curl⁡ is the distributional one, and for smooth periodic fields the pairing identities of the definition reduce to the displayed ones).

2.1step 1.1L1L2

The characters Φn of [L1] are orthonormal in L2(T;C): orthogonality factors as a product of one-dimensional character pairings, and the jth factor is 1 for equal coordinate indices and 0 otherwise by the one-dimensional orthonormality of [L1]. They are complete: if f∈L2(T;C) is orthogonal to every Φn, fix n2,n3∈Z and set g(x1):=∫f(x1,x2,x3)e−iπ(n2x2/L2+n3x3/L3) dν2dν3, an L2 function of x1 by Cauchy-Schwarz; its one-dimensional character coefficients all vanish, since they are the Φn pairings of f with n1 varying, so g=0 a.e. by the one-dimensional completeness of [L1]; applying this for all n2,n3 and iterating in the other two coordinates, with a countable union of exceptional null sets, gives f=0 a.e., so the closed span is all of L2(T;C). Parseval and mean-square convergence of finite partial sums follow from [L1] applied componentwise to the six real components of a pair of fields.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2L4algebra

Group the character indices into the disjoint reflection orbits Op={n∈Z3:∣nj∣=pj (j=1,2,3)} indexed by p∈N03. Let Pp be the finite-dimensional real space of Fourier coefficient arrays (vn,wn)n∈Op satisfying reality, the stated parities, and kn⋅vn=kn⋅wn=0, where kn=(πn1/L1,πn2/L2,πn3/L3). The divergence constraints are equivalent to these equations: testing against each character gives necessity, and an orbit sum with these equations has zero divergence pointwise. Projection onto a whole orbit commutes with coordinate reflections and reality. Thus whole-orbit truncations lie in C and converge in L2 by step 2.1, proving density. The corresponding real products are the stated even-coordinate cosines and odd-coordinate sines, with zero-index sine terms absent. Parseval gives ε∥E∥22+∥B∥22/μ=∑pQp, where Qp=∑n∈Op(ε∣vn∣2+∣wn∣2/μ). The mode equations are vn′=i(εμ)−1kn×wn, wn′=−ikn×vn. Curl sends the magnetic parity pattern to the electric pattern and conversely: differentiating changes the parity of exactly the differentiated coordinate; the two terms in each curl component have the required pattern. These equations preserve reality and divergence, so define a real linear map on Pp. For real kn, put C=v‾n⋅(kn×wn). The scalar triple product gives w‾n⋅(kn×vn)=−C‾, hence the energy derivative is (2/μ)Re⁡(iC+iC‾)=0. Therefore each Qp is conserved.

4.1step 3.1step 1.1L3algebra

Enumerate p∈N03 by increasing p1+p2+p3, then lexicographically within each finite level, writing p(1),p(2),…. Every coefficient belongs to exactly one Pp(m); let Am be the real matrix of the orbit operator of step 3.1 in the real basis obtained by Gaussian elimination on its finite linear constraints, with the coordinates in lexicographic order and the first available pivot chosen each time. This defines all bases without a countable choice of bases. Each Am is bounded, so the finite-dimensional linear system zm′=Amzm has a unique global solution through every real initial vector zm(0), by the global Lipschitz corollary of [L3]; no choice is needed for one system. For M≥1 let (EM,BM) be the sum of the first M modal solutions with the initial amplitudes inherited from the given initial datum (E0,B0)∈C. Each (EM,BM) is a finite sum of smooth modes, hence smooth and in C, solves the two equations pointwise, and satisfies ε∥EM(t)∥2+∥BM(t)∥2/μ=∑m≤MQp(m)(0) for all t by the modal invariance of step 3.1. The omitted modes carry the nonnegative initial partial energies RM:=∑m>MQp(m)(0), which decrease to 0 because the total initial energy ∑mQp(m)(0)=ε∥E0∥2+∥B0∥2/μ is finite. For M<M′ and every t∈R, ε∥(EM′−EM)(t)∥2+∥(BM′−BM)(t)∥2/μ=∑M<m≤M′Qp(m)(t)≤RM, because each omitted modal energy is constant; hence (EM,BM) is Cauchy uniformly in t in L2(T;R3)2, and its uniform limit (E,B)∈C(R;L2) exists and takes values in the closed subspace C of step 1.1, with ε∥E(t)∥2+∥B(t)∥2/μ=lim⁡M(ε∥EM(t)∥2+∥BM(t)∥2/μ)=∑mQp(m)(0) for every t.

4.2step 3.1step 1.1L4L3

Let (E,B)∈C(R;C) be any weak solution in the sense of step 1.1, and fix a mode index m together with a real mode function φ in the finite-dimensional space of modes belonging to the orbit Op(m) (a smooth periodic vector field). Testing the two weak equations with ψ(t)φ(x), where ψ∈Cc∞(R) is arbitrary, gives, in the sense of distributions on R, the scalar equations cφ′=(the corresponding finite linear combination of the other modal coefficients), where cφ(t)=⟨φ,(E,B)(t)⟩ is the coefficient pairing; these are continuous functions of t because (E,B) is continuous into L2 and the pairing is continuous. Assembling the finitely many coefficients belonging to Op(m) into a real vector Zm(t) gives a finite linear system ∂tZm=AmZm with continuous right-hand side; applying the primitive construction componentwise on a compact interval [a,b], every component of AmZm is continuous, hence Riemann integrable [L4], its oriented primitive G is C1 with G′=g [L4], and the regular-distribution compatibility clause of [L4] (whose use here is covered by the standing ACω) transfers this to distributional derivatives; subtracting the primitive from Zm shows that the difference has zero distributional derivative, hence is constant on the connected set R [L4]; continuity makes the equality pointwise. Therefore every modal coefficient is a classical C1 solution of its finite linear system. Since Zm solves a linear constant-coefficient ODE, its value at every time is determined by Zm(0) by the global uniqueness part of [L3]; hence the weak solution (E,B) is uniquely determined by its initial datum (E(0),B(0)), because the modal coefficients determine the fields by the completeness in step 3.1.

5.1step 4.1step 4.2step 3.1algebra

The energy of the constructed solution is constant. By step 4.1, for every t one has ε∥E(t)∥2+∥B(t)∥2/μ=∑mQp(m)(0), the same value at every t; and ∑mQp(m)(0)=ε∥E0∥2+∥B0∥2/μ by the Parseval identity of step 3.1, while the normalized torus measure and Lebesgue measure on Q have the norm conversion ∫Q∣E∣2=L1L2L3∥E∥L2(ν)2 and likewise for B. Hence the energy 12∫Q(ε∣E∣2+∣B∣2/μ) dx of the constructed solution equals its initial value at every time. By the uniqueness of step 4.2, every C(R;L2) weak solution in the class with the same initial datum is this solution, so energy conservation holds for every weak solution.

5.2step 4.1step 1.1step 3.1algebra

The limit (E,B) of step 4.1 is a weak solution in the sense of step 1.1. Indeed, each truncation (EM,BM) solves the equations pointwise, hence also in the pairing formulation, because for smooth periodic fields the distributional pairings coincide with the integral pairings and the cur sign convention is the same. For a smooth periodic test pair (Ψ,Θ) compactly supported in t, the differences satisfy ∣∬(EM−E)⋅∂tΨ dν dt∣≤sup⁡t∥(EM−E)(t)∥L2⋅∫∥∂tΨ(t)∥L2 dt, and ∫∥∂tΨ(t)∥ dt<∞ because Ψ is compactly supported in time and continuous, so the bound tends to 0 by the uniform convergence of step 4.1; the pairings with curl⁡Ψ and curl⁡Θ, and the corresponding pairings of BM, are handled identically. Passing to the limit in the two displayed identities therefore shows that (E,B) is a weak solution. The divergence constraints hold in the limit because the class C is closed, as recorded in step 1.1.

6.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2step 5.1step 5.2∎

Collecting the results: step 3.1 proves claim (i), namely that the finite separated Fourier modes are dense in the class and that the class is complete for the L2 pairing; steps 4.1 and 5.2 construct, for every initial datum in the class, a C(R;L2) weak solution in the class, and step 4.2 proves that it is the only one, which is claim (ii); step 5.1 proves the energy constancy of claim (iii) for every weak solution. Countable Choice is used exactly through the torus-character, Fourier-convergence, Hilbert-space and regular-distribution suppliers of [L1] and [L4]; the finite-dimensional modal systems and the energy identity use no further choice. This proves every assertion of the statement.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources