Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth causal-cone collar barrier with screen directions

Statement

Consider either (i) the selected ingoing RN model with M>0, Q2>0, M2≥Q2, and rH=M+M2−Q2, or (ii) the selected ingoing KN model with M>0, M2≥a2+q2>0, and rH=M+M2−a2−q2. In each case rH>0. There is δ>0 and a collar C=Rv×(rH−δ,rH+δ)×S2 on which τ:=v−r is a smooth temporal function in the sense of Chronology, causality, strong causality, global hyperbolicity and time functions: its gradient is past timelike and dτ(Z)>0 for every nonzero future causal vector Z. There is a finite C≥0 such that dr(Z)≤C∣r−rH∣ dτ(Z) for every future causal Z over the collar. On r=rH one also has dr(Z)≤0. This is a local cone estimate on the two specified metrics; it is not an event-horizon theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact ingoing RN or KN metric and its global future timelike orientation field, with the parameter conditions in the Statement.

[F1]

Selected ingoing RN extension and time orientation: g=−f dv2+2 dv dr+r2γ, N=∂v+(f/2−1)∂r is a global future timelike field, and the metric coefficients are independent of v.

[F2]

Regular ingoing KN metric, field and sphere axes: the KN metric and field are smooth on Rv×(0,∞)r×S2, the signature is (−,+,+,+), N=∂v−(1+f02)∂r/2 is a global future timelike field, and all coefficients are independent of v. Its field-equation continuation is conditional, but only its smooth metric and orientation are used here.

[F3]

The inverse metric, musical isomorphisms and index raising: the gradient is ∇τ=(dτ)♯ and g(∇τ,∇τ)=g−1(dτ,dτ).

[F4]

Chronology, causality, strong causality, global hyperbolicity and time functions: a smooth temporal function has past-timelike gradient, equivalently g(∇τ,∇τ)<0 and dτ(N)>0.

[F5]

Classification of future and past causal vectors by a timelike field: for a nonzero causal Z, future-directedness is equivalent to g(Z,N)<0.

[F6]

Existence of a smooth future-directed tetrad field near every event: near each point of a time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold there is a smooth future orthonormal tetrad. Its tangent-bundle convention inherits only ACω from The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω).

[F7]

Explicit rational and real power regimes supplies the unique positive square root for a positive real. Choice-free smooth inverse function theorem in Euclidean space gives smoothness of a local inverse when the derivative is nonzero.

[F10]

The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a): for a real function continuous on a closed interval and differentiable in its interior, its increment equals its derivative at an interior point times the interval length.

[A1]

Choose δ with rH−δ>0 and compact radial closure. The angular base is the compact unit sphere S2. In KN, Ψ=X∂Y−Y∂X denotes the smooth global rotation field, equal to ∂ψ on polar charts.

[A2]

Only the published tetrad supplier's inherited ACω background is used; this proof uses no full axiom of choice or dependent choice.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4F5F6F9A1algebra

In RN, dτ=dv−dr and the inverse v,r block of [F1] gives g−1(dτ,dτ)=f−2, which equals −2 at rH. After shrinking a radial collar it remains negative, and dτ(N)=2−f/2>0. In KN, direct inversion of [F2] gives g−1(dτ,dτ)=a2sin⁡2θ−2R+ΔΣ. At rH, Δ=0, R=rH2+a2, and the numerator satisfies a2sin⁡2θ−2R≤−2rH2−a2<0. Compactness of S2 and continuity therefore give a uniform radial collar where this norm stays negative. There dτ(N)=1+(1+f02)/2>0. Thus ∇τ is past timelike in either case by [F3-F4]. In a local future orthonormal tetrad, write −∇τ=(T0,T) and a future causal Z=(Z0,Z). Then T0>∥T∥ and Z0≥∥Z∥, with Z0>0, by the signature and selected cone. By [F9], g(−∇τ,Z)=−T0Z0+T⋅Z≤−(T0−∥T∥)Z0<0. Therefore dτ(Z)=g(∇τ,Z)>0.

1.2F1F2F5F9A1algebra

At an RN root, ξ=∂v satisfies ξ♭=−f dv+dr=dr, and g(ξ,N)=−1<0 there, so it is future null by [F5]. At a KN root put RH=rH2+a2 and χ=∂v+aRHΨ. Substitution in the metric of [F2] gives χ♭=(ΣH/RH)dr, where ΣH=rH2+a2cos⁡2θ>0. Also dr(N)=−(1+f02)/2<0, so g(χ,N)=χ♭(N)<0 and χ is future null. In both cases dr on the root is a positive multiple of the covector of a future null generator. In an orthonormal frame, if future null K=(K0,K) and future causal Z=(Z0,Z), then K0=∥K∥, Z0≥∥Z∥, and g(K,Z)=−K0Z0+K⋅Z≤−K0Z0+∥K∥∥Z∥≤0. Consequently dr(Z)≤0 on r=rH.

2.1F1F2F3F5F6F7step 1.1A1A2algebra

Put u:=−g−1(dτ,dτ)>0 on the collar by step 1.1. The unique positive root u is smooth: at every u0>0 the map s↦s2 has derivative 2u0≠0, so [F7] gives a smooth local inverse; uniqueness makes these local inverses agree. Hence nτ:=−∇τ/u is a smooth future unit timelike field. At v=0, cover the compact sphere section at r=rH by finitely many relatively compact neighborhoods on which [F6] supplies smooth future orthonormal tetrads (E0,E1,E2,E3). Shrink δ so the closed radial collar over each smaller patch stays in its tetrad neighborhood. Extend these tetrads to all v by the isometric translations of [F1-F2]; both metrics and dτ are v-translation invariant. On each neighborhood set Pi:=Ei+g(Ei,nτ)nτ for i=1,2,3. Then dτ(Pi)=0. If ∑iciPi=0, then ∑iciEi is a multiple of nτ; its squared norm is nonnegative, while a nonzero multiple of nτ has negative squared norm. Hence all ci=0. The kernel of dτ is positive definite, so finite Gram-Schmidt gives a smooth orthonormal screen (e1,e2,e3) after shrinking each neighborhood. Its normalization roots are smooth by the same inverse argument. Every future causal vector with dτ(Z)=1 has Z=nτ+b1e1+b2e2+b3e3dτ(nτ),b12+b22+b32≤1. Indeed, write Z=snτ+W with W⊥nτ. Since nτ is future timelike and Z is future causal, [F5] gives g(nτ,Z)<0, so s=−g(nτ,Z)>0. Causality gives g(W,W)≤s2, and dτ(Z)=su=1.

3.1F8F10step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

On each finite coordinate patch of step 2.1, the function G(r,ω,b):=dr(Z) for the displayed normalized vector is smooth in the radial variable, the compact sphere-coordinate subset and the closed unit ball b∈R3. Their products with the closed radial interval and unit ball are closed bounded Euclidean sets, hence compact by [F8]. Applying the extreme-value theorem [F8] to ∣∂rG∣ on each product and taking the largest of finitely many bounds gives one finite C≥0, uniform in v. At r=rH, step 1.2 gives G(rH,ω,b)≤0. The one-variable mean-value theorem [F10] therefore gives, throughout the collar, G(r,ω,b)≤G(rH,ω,b)+C∣r−rH∣≤C∣r−rH∣. For any nonzero future causal Z, step 1.1 gives dτ(Z)>0; apply the normalized estimate to Z/dτ(Z) and multiply back. The zero vector is trivial. This proves the asserted cone bound including all angular screen directions.

Remarks

The local geometric estimate is proved from the exact metrics and selected orientations. No event-horizon identification or principal-null-direction shortcut is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources