Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite continuous surface integrals on compact C1 boundaries

Statement

Let Ω⊂R3 be a nonempty bounded open set whose boundary is locally, after a rigid coordinate change, a C1 graph with Ω on one side. Put S=∂Ω. Then S is compact and has a finite cover by graph charts Xj:Uj⊂R2→S∩Oj that are C1 homeomorphisms onto S∩Oj, have derivative of rank two everywhere, and have C1 coordinate transitions and a finite subordinate nonnegative smooth ambient partition χj with supports compactly contained in Oj and sum one on S. For every continuous f:S→R, define ∫Sf dS:=∑j∫R2gj(y) dy,gj(y)={χj(Xj(y))f(Xj(y))det⁡(DXj(y)TDXj(y)),y∈Uj,0,y∉Uj. The right-hand integrals are Riemann integrals of continuous compactly supported functions, and the finite sum is independent of the charts and partition. In graph coordinates X(y)=(y,h(y)) the area density is 1+∣Dh∣2. The outward unit normal is (−Dh,1)/1+∣Dh∣2 for the subgraph side, transported by the rigid chart, and is continuous and independent of charts. Vector and tensor surface integrals are componentwise; flux means ∫SF⋅n dS for continuous F. All these integrals are finite. The empty surface has zero integral. If additionally the Axiom of Countable Choice is assumed, meaning that every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function, then these same continuous-field surface integrals agree with the finite-chart Lebesgue surface integrals with the same Gram density.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The bounded open set with locally one-sided C1 graph boundary and continuous scalar or vector fields on its boundary.

[F2]

The standard smooth step σ is smooth, takes values in [0,1], equals zero on (−∞,0], and equals one on [1,∞). (The standard smooth step function)

[F3]

Let n≥1, let V⊆Rn be open, and let T:V→Rn be injective and C1 with invertible derivative. If p:Rn→R is compactly supported Riemann integrable and supp⁡p⊆T(V), then h=(p∘T)∣det⁡DT∣ on V, extended by zero off V, is compactly supported Riemann integrable and ∫Rnp=∫Rnh. (A compactly supported Riemann integrand admits the global change-of-variables formula from a diffeomorphism near the relevant compact preimage)

[F6]

Borel Darboux integrands in finite dimension: assuming ACω, a bounded Borel Riemann-integrable function on a nondegenerate box in Rn, n≥1, is Lebesgue integrable there with the same integral. Here Countable Choice means that every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)); this extra premise is used only for the conditional agreement assertion.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2

The boundary is closed and bounded, hence compact by F1. Consider the family of all available local one-sided graph neighborhoods and all smaller ambient chart neighborhoods whose compact closures lie inside such neighborhoods. This family covers S; compactness retains finitely many smaller neighborhoods and their corresponding charts, without selecting a chart separately for every point. The partition is constructed explicitly in the next two steps. Each graph chart is a homeomorphism onto its image, has rank two, and has C1 transitions: on an overlap the inverse of the second graph chart is its rigid-coordinate projection onto the two base coordinates.

2.1step 1.1F1F2algebra

Consider all rational centers a∈Q3 and positive rational radii r<R for which B‾R(a) lies inside one original chart neighborhood Oj. Assign each pair to the least such index j. Their inner balls Br(a) cover S, since every point has a small ball inside one chart neighborhood, and rational centers and radii can be chosen with a strict margin around that point. F1 retains finitely many inner balls covering S. For each retained pair put sl=(rl+Rl)/2 and bl(x)=σ ⁣(sl2−∣x−al∣2sl2−rl2). By F2 each bl is smooth, between zero and one, equals one on B‾rl(al) and has support in B‾sl(al)⋐Oj(l). This is a finite explicit selection from one covering family, with no countable-choice premise.

2.2step 1.1F3F4F5

For graph charts X:UX→S∩OX and Y:UY→S∩OY, put E=S∩OX∩OY, V=X−1(E) and W=Y−1(E). These parameter domains are open, and T=Y−1∘X:V→W is a C1 diffeomorphism with X=Y∘T. F4 gives DX=(DY∘T)DT and hence JX=(JY∘T)∣det⁡DT∣, with JX=det⁡(DXTDX); rank two makes both Gram densities positive. Let w:S→R be continuous with compact support C⊂E. The function p(z)=w(Y(z))JY(z) on W, extended by zero to R2, is continuous with support contained in the compact set Y−1(C)⊂W=T(V), so it is Riemann integrable by F5. Apply F3 with n=2 and this T,p. Its pulled-back integrand on V is w(X(y))JX(y), so the two zero-extended coordinate integrals agree.

3.1step 2.1F2algebra

Put s=∑lbl and θ=σ(4s−1). Then s≥1 on S and θ=1 on the neighborhood {s>1/2} of S. For s>0 define cl=θbl/s, and extend it by zero on s=0. Since θ=0 where s≤1/4, this extension is smooth. Each cl is nonnegative with compact support inside Oj(l). Put χj=∑l:j(l)=jcl, using zero for an empty index set. Then each support is a finite union of compact subsets of Oj, and ∑jχj=θ=1 near S.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1F5

For each j, S∩supp⁡χj is compact and contained in S∩Oj. Its inverse under Xj is compact inside Uj. Thus gj vanishes outside a compact subset of Uj, its extension by zero is continuous on R2, and F5 makes its integral finite and independent of the containing rectangle.

5.1step 4.1step 2.2F5

Given two chart partitions χj and ηk, insert ∑kηk=1 in each integral of the first sum. The support on S of each χjηk is compact inside both chart neighborhoods, so step 2.2 transfers this continuous overlap integrand to the second chart. Finite linearity in F5 and ∑jχj=1 recover exactly the second sum, proving chart and partition independence.

6.1step 5.1F4F5algebra

The graph derivative has columns (ei,∂ih), so its Gram matrix has entries Gij=δij+∂ih ∂jh for i,j∈{1,2}, and det⁡G=(1+(∂1h)2)(1+(∂2h)2)−(∂1h)2(∂2h)2=1+∣Dh∣2. The vector (−Dh,1) is perpendicular to both tangent columns and points out of the subgraph. On overlaps both graph descriptions have the same tangent plane; of its two unit normals the exterior side selects the same one. For the upper-side region the outward normal is the negative of the displayed subgraph normal. Rigid coordinate maps transport the chosen exterior-side vector, including orientation-reversing maps, by their orthogonal linear part; the exterior-side criterion still gives agreement on overlaps. The graph formula is continuous. Componentwise finite linearity and the continuous dot product give all vector, tensor and flux assertions.

7.1givenF6step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

For the conditional agreement assertion only, assume Countable Choice. By step 4.1 each zero-extended gj is continuous and compactly supported in R2, hence bounded and Borel on a containing nondegenerate closed rectangle and Riemann integrable there. Apply F6 with n=2 to this rectangle. Its Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree, and it vanishes outside the rectangle. Equality term by term in the finite chart sum gives equality of the continuous-field surface integrals; step 5.1 already makes the Riemann sum independent of the chosen charts and partition. This imports no Countable Choice premise into the preceding construction or independence proof, and asserts no extension to arbitrary measurable surface fields.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources