Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Elementary zero-boundary L6 and L4 interpolation

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let Ω⊂R3 be bounded and open, and let H,V be the closure spaces defined above when Ω≠∅. If Ω=∅, use the same closure formulas: take the finite product of scalar W1,2 spaces as H1, let H01 be the H1 closure of Cc∞(Ω;R3), let Dσ={a∈Cc∞(Ω;R3):div⁡a=0}, and let H and V be the L2 and H01 closures of Dσ. All these spaces are then {0}. There is a constant C independent of Ω and a such that every a∈H01(Ω;R3) satisfies ∥a∥L6(Ω)≤C∥∇a∥L2(Ω),∥a∥L4(Ω)≤∥a∥L2(Ω)1/4∥a∥L6(Ω)3/4. For T>0, if u∈L∞(0,T;H)∩L2(0,T;V), then u∈L8/3(0,T;L4(Ω)). Here the time-dependent Lp notation means strong measurability and integrability of the displayed norm; the continuous embedding V→L4(Ω) carries strongly measurable V-valued maps to strongly measurable L4-valued maps. Let V∗ be the continuous real-linear dual of V with its operator norm. Choose any strongly measurable representative u~:(0,T)→V of the L2(0,T;V) class of u; through the embedding V→H, it represents the same H-valued class almost everywhere. For almost every t∈(0,T) define bu(t)(ϕ)=−∫Ωu~i(t,x)u~j(t,x)∂jϕi(x)dx,ϕ∈V, and assign bu(t)=0 on any exceptional null set. Then bu(t)∈V∗ for almost every t, t↦bu(t) is strongly measurable, and its equivalence class is independent of the chosen representative u~. This class belongs to L4/3(0,T;V∗) and satisfies ∥bu(t)∥V∗≤∥u~(t)∥L4(Ω)2for almost every t∈(0,T).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a bounded open Ω⊂R3, a∈H01(Ω;R3), and u∈L∞(0,T;H)∩L2(0,T;V) for the closure spaces defined above.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; the basis/separability input below is used under this hypothesis.

[F1]

Bounded no-slip solenoidal closure spaces: H01 is the closure of compactly supported smooth fields in the H1 norm; V embeds continuously into H01.

[F2]

Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases: Hölder's inequality includes Cauchy–Schwarz for the integrable products below.

[F3]

Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product: the coordinate-line integrals below may be iterated and reordered.

[F4]

The indefinite integral of an L1 function is differentiable almost everywhere: under Countable Choice, the indefinite integral of an L1 function has derivative equal to its integrand almost everywhere. The smooth endpoint identity needed below is derived directly in step 1.1.

[F5]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice selects a Sobolev-approximating sequence from the closure definition of H01.

[F6]

Countable smooth solenoidal basis for bounded closure spaces: V is a separable Hilbert space and its finite smooth solenoidal span is dense in V.

[F7]

Weak time continuity and energy spaces: for a separable Hilbert target, Lp(0,T;X) means strong measurability and an integrable pth-power norm.

[F8]

Separability and Hilbert structure of the no-slip dual: the Riesz map is a surjective isometry from V onto V∗, so V∗ is a separable Hilbert space and the Bochner convention in [F7] applies.

[F9]

Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms and Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure: scalar W1,2 and its test-function closure are defined on every open set, including the empty one, where they contain only the zero class.

Proof

1.1givenA1F7F9algebra

If Ω=∅, [F9] and the local closure formulas in the Statement give H01=H=V={0}. The only linear functional on V is zero, so V∗={0} as well; each zero space is a separable real Hilbert space (the singleton {0} is dense). Every spatial Lp class and every time-dependent map with one of these zero targets is zero, with the constant zero simple map proving strong measurability. Thus both spatial inequalities, time integrability, representative independence, the defining formula for bu, and the V∗ norm bound all hold with zero on both sides, for the same positive universal constant as in the nonempty case. No basis, approximation sequence or zero-extension theorem for a nonempty domain is applied here. Henceforth assume Ω≠∅; all uses of [F1], [F6] and [F8] below are in that case.

1.2givenF2F3F4algebra

For real g∈C1([a,b]), put G(t)=∫atg′(s)ds. The difference between its difference quotient at an interior t and g′(t) is bounded by sup⁡∣s−t∣≤∣h∣∣g′(s)−g′(t)∣, which tends to zero. Hence (G−g)′=0 everywhere inside the interval; the mean value theorem and endpoint continuity give g(b)−g(a)=∫abg′. For h∈Cc∞(R3) define A1(x2,x3)=∫R∣∂1h(x1,x2,x3)∣dx1, and define A2(x1,x3) and A3(x1,x2) analogously. Applying the endpoint identity along each coordinate line from a point outside the support gives ∣h(x)∣≤Ai(xi^) for each i, hence ∣h∣3/2≤(A1A2A3)1/2. Put B2(x3)=∫A2(x1,x3)dx1 and B3(x2)=∫A3(x1,x2)dx1. Cauchy–Schwarz in x1 gives ∫(A2A3)1/2dx1≤(B2B3)1/2; applying Cauchy–Schwarz in (x2,x3) to the remaining A11/2(B2B3)1/2 gives ∫R3∣h∣3/2≤(∫R2A1)1/2(∫RB2)1/2(∫RB3)1/2=∏i=13(∫R3∣∂ih∣)1/2. The changes of integration order are justified by [F3]. Raising to the power 2/3 yields ∥h∥3/2≤∏i∥∂ih∥11/3.

2.1givenF2step 1.2

For a smooth compactly supported vector field w, set h=∣w∣4, which is smooth, and note ∣∂ih∣≤4∣w∣3∣∂iw∣. Hölder gives ∥∂ih∥1≤4∥w∥63∥∂iw∥2. Substitution into step 1.2 yields ∥w∥64≤4∥w∥63∏i∥∂iw∥21/3≤4∥w∥63∥∇w∥2. Divide when ∥w∥6>0; if it is zero the inequality is immediate.

3.1givenF1F2F5step 2.1

By [F1] and [F5], choose wn∈Cc∞(Ω;R3) converging to a in H1. The inequality of step 2.1 applied to differences makes (wn) Cauchy in L6; on bounded Ω, convergence in L6 also implies convergence in L2, so its L6 limit is the given L2 class a. Passing to the limit proves the first inequality. Finally, ∫∣a∣4≤(∫∣a∣2)1/2(∫∣a∣6)1/2 by Cauchy–Schwarz, which proves the interpolation inequality. For almost every t, raising it to power 8/3 gives ∥u(t)∥48/3≤∥u(t)∥22/3∥u(t)∥62≤C∥u(t)∥H2/3∥u(t)∥V2. Integrating and using u∈Lt∞H∩Lt2V proves the stated Lt8/3Lx4 bound.

4.1givenA1F2F6F7F8step 1.1step 3.1∎

Fix the strongly measurable representative u~ chosen in the Statement. For almost every time, Hölder gives ∣bu(t)(ϕ)∣≤∥u~(t)∥42∥∇ϕ∥2, so bu(t)∈V∗ and its norm is at most ∥u~(t)∥42. The map a↦ba is continuous from L4 to V∗ because ∥ba−bc∥V∗≤(∥a∥4+∥c∥4)∥a−c∥4. Composing simple-map approximations to u~ with the continuous embedding V→L4 and this map therefore gives strongly measurable V∗-valued bu, up to the permitted null-set assignment; [F6,F8] provide the separable Hilbert target. Two representatives of the same Lt2V class agree in V almost everywhere, hence agree in L4 there and define the same bu almost everywhere. Thus its Bochner class is independent of the representative. Finally ∫0T∥bu(t)∥V∗4/3dt≤∫0T∥u~(t)∥48/3dt<∞ by step 3.1; [F7] gives bu∈L4/3(0,T;V∗).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources