Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adapted
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-rank gapped spectral cluster under a bounded perturbation

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let H be an arbitrary complex Hilbert space (Hilbert space) and H0=H0∗ a self-adjoint operator on its exact dense domain D=D(H0) (Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators). Let E∈R be an isolated eigenvalue with dist⁡(E,σ(H0)∖{E})≥g>0, and let its orthogonal spectral projection P0=EH0({E}) have finite rank r≥1. The PVM and gap calculus are those of CC spectral calculus on an arbitrary complex Hilbert space by compatible vector-local Cayley subspaces. Let V=V∗∈B(H) and v=∥V∥≥0 (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum). Put Hλ=H0+λV on D, and define Ωv={{λ∈C:∣λ∣<g/(2v)},v>0,C,v=0. For λ∈Ωv write qλ=2∣λ∣v/g<1, Γ={z:∣z−E∣=g/2} oriented counterclockwise, and Δ={z:∣z−E∣<g/2}.

(a) Resolvent and exact domain. Hλ is closed and densely defined on D. Every z∈Γ is a resolvent point, with the convention Rλ(z)=(z−Hλ)−1:H→D of Resolvent and spectrum of an unbounded operator, and Rλ(z)=R0(z)∑k≥0(λVR0(z))k,∥Rλ(z)∥≤2/g1−qλ,∥Rλ(z)−R0(z)∥≤2gqλ1−qλ. The series converges in operator norm uniformly on Γ and locally uniformly in λ∈Ωv.

(b) Finite-rank holomorphic cluster. The norm contour integral Pλ=12πi∮ΓRλ(z) dz is a bounded idempotent of rank exactly r throughout Ωv, with Pλ=0=P0 and ∥Pλ−P0∥≤qλ/(1−qλ). It is holomorphic in operator norm. Its range Mλ=PλH lies in D and is invariant under Hλ, and PλHλ=HλPλ on D. Both HλPλ∈B(H) and Pλ:H→(D,∥x∥+∥H0x∥) are holomorphic in their respective operator norms.

(c) Exactly the enclosed spectrum. Let Aλ=Hλ∣Mλ:Mλ→Mλ. Then σ(Hλ)∩Δ=σ(Aλ)⊂Δ. This is a nonempty finite set of at most r eigenvalues. The restriction of w−Hλ to ker⁡Pλ has a bounded two-sided inverse on its exact domain D∩ker⁡Pλ for every w∈Δ. Consequently all generalized eigenvectors at an enclosed eigenvalue belong to Mλ; their eigenspaces and generalized eigenspaces are those of this finite-dimensional restriction.

(d) Real coupling and zero perturbation. For real λ, Hλ is self-adjoint on D. For real λ∈Ωv, Pλ=EHλ((E−g/2,E+g/2)) is the orthogonal projection on the entire enclosed spectral cluster (Projection valued measure). If v=0, then V=0, Hλ=H0 and Pλ=P0 for every complex coupling, with Aλ=EIM0 and enclosed spectrum {E}.

No separability or arbitrary-index Axiom of Choice is assumed. The claim supplies a cluster and its finite restriction; for r>1 it supplies no ordering or individually holomorphic scalar eigenvalue branches.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: CC; H,H0,D,E,g,P0,r,V,v,Ωv,λ,Γ,Δ as in the statement. Inner products are linear in the first argument. Contour integrals are operator-norm limits of Riemann sums.

[F1]

The CC arbitrary-Hilbert supplier CC spectral calculus on an arbitrary complex Hilbert space by compatible vector-local Cayley subspaces supplies the unique representing PVM, bounded Borel product/adjoint laws, exact square-integrability domains, concentration on the spectrum, spectral support equal to the spectrum and the distance resolvent bound. These are its current Statement and proof steps 4.1–6.2, rather than an AC global spectral decomposition. Its inverse is (H0−z)−1, with multiplier (t−z)−1; the convention here is R0(z)=−(H0−z)−1, with multiplier (z−t)−1. This sign conversion preserves its norm bound and exact range.

[F2]

The operator, domain and inverse conventions are those of Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Resolvent and spectrum of an unbounded operator, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces and The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum. Bounded operator spaces are complete: an operator-norm Cauchy sequence has a pointwise limit in the complete target Hilbert space, which is linear and bounded, and the same uniform Cauchy estimates give operator-norm convergence. If ∥B∥<1 the geometric series ∑k≥0Bk is the inverse of I−B, as multiplication of finite sums leaves the remainder BN+1→0.

[F3]

On a positively oriented circle about a, the integral of (z-a)^m is zero for every integer m except -1, and is 2 pi i for m=-1 and Cauchy's integral formula on a circle compactly contained in a disc of holomorphy supply scalar circle integrals and the Cauchy formula. Continuous scalar pairings and uniform norm limits give their bounded-operator versions. Finite-dimensional orthonormal bases require only finite Gram–Schmidt (Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis); an injective map on an r-dimensional space sends a basis to r independent vectors, hence a basis, so is surjective; conversely a surjective map has r spanning images of a basis, which must be independent. A map B on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space is bounded because an orthonormal basis (ej) gives ∥Bx∥≤∑j∣⟨x,ej⟩∣∥Bej∥≤(∑j∥Bej∥2)1/2∥x∥, and this applies to its inverse when bijective.

Proof

Given: The data of the statement and [F1]–[F3].

1.1givenF1F2algebra

[Gap and correctly ordered Neumann inverse] By [F1], the spectral support of H0 is σ(H0). For z∈Γ, ∣z−E∣=g/2 and every other spectral point t has ∣z−t∣≥∣t−E∣−∣z−E∣≥g/2. Thus ∥R0(z)∥≤2/g. The operator Hλ is closed on D: if xn→x and Hλxn→y, then H0xn→y−λVx, so closedness of H0 gives x∈D and Hλx=y; the domain remains dense. On D, z−Hλ=(I−λVR0(z))(z−H0). Its first factor has the Neumann inverse [F2], since ∥λVR0(z)∥≤qλ<1. Therefore the displayed ordered series gives a two-sided inverse with range exactly D, and its geometric estimates give (a). Uniform convergence on the circle and each compact coupling subdisk proves norm holomorphy in λ; local inverse Neumann series give holomorphy in z on the resolvent set. When v=0 this series is constant for all couplings.

2.1step 1.1F2F3algebra

[Idempotence from two contours] Fix λ∈Ωv. Step 1.1 bounds the inverse uniformly on Γ, and another inverse Neumann series gives a resolvent annulus around it. Integrals of a holomorphic operator-valued function over concentric circles in that annulus are independent of radius: differentiating ∫02πf(E+ρeit)iρeit dt in ρ gives the integral of the periodic t derivative of f(E+ρeit)eit, hence zero. Take an outer circle for z and an inner circle for w. The inverse equations give Rλ(z)Rλ(w)=[Rλ(w)−Rλ(z)]/(z−w), and also commutation of resolvents. In its double integral, the first term integrates in the outer variable to the inner projection integral because ∮dz/(z−w)=2πi; the second integrates in the inner variable to zero because ∮dw/(z−w)=0. Compact continuous integrals can be interchanged by norm Riemann sums. Annular independence identifies both circle integrals with Pλ, proving Pλ2=Pλ. Resolvent commutation also gives PλRλ(z)=Rλ(z)Pλ.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F2algebra

[Graph domains, commutation and holomorphy] The identity HλRλ(z)=zRλ(z)−I makes the contour integrand continuous into the complete graph space of the closed Hλ. Integrating there proves PλH⊂D and HλPλ=(2πi)−1∮ΓzRλ(z) dz=:Cλ∈B(H). On D the other inverse equation gives Rλ(z)Hλ=zRλ(z)−I, so integration gives PλHλ=Cλ there. Thus the range and kernel reduce the operator with its domain. The uniform coupling series makes both Pλ and Cλ norm holomorphic. Since H0Pλ=Cλ−λVPλ, the pair (Pλ,H0Pλ) is holomorphic into B(H,H⊕H) and takes values in the closed graph of H0; hence Pλ is holomorphic as an operator into that graph space. In particular, the finite restriction Aλ is well-defined on all of Mλ.

3.2step 1.1step 2.1F1F3algebra

[Initial projection and rank throughout the disk] At zero coupling use the sign conversion in [F1]: R0(z) has multiplier (z−t)−1, whose counterclockwise integral divided by 2πi is 1 inside and 0 outside. Thus the resolvent contour is the PVM projection on the real interior; its only unperturbed spectral point is E, so this is P0. This evaluation follows by spectral pairings: scalar circle kernels integrate to one inside and zero outside [F3]; norm Riemann sums converge uniformly in the spectral variable, since the spectrum is at distance at least g/2 from the circle, allowing interchange with its finite scalar measures. The circle length πg and step 1.1 give ∥Pλ−P0∥≤qλ/(1−qλ). If bounded idempotents P,Q have ∥P−Q∥<1, then x∈ran⁡P and Qx=0 imply ∥x∥=∥(P−Q)x∥<∥x∥ unless x=0; therefore Q∣ran⁡P is injective, and the reverse restriction is also injective. For s,t∈[0,1], the inverse equations give Rsλ(z)−Rtλ(z)=(s−t)λRsλ(z)VRtλ(z), hence ∥Psλ−Ptλ∥≤qλ∣s−t∣/(1−qλ)2. Choose an integer N>qλ/(1−qλ)2 and compare the finite path Pjλ/N, 0≤j≤N. At each adjacent pair the two injections and finite dimension imply equal rank. Starting with rank r proves rank r at λ, even when the direct distance estimate is at least one. If qλ=0 the path is constant.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2F3algebra

[All spectral values of the finite restriction are inside] Put M=Mλ, A=Aλ, P=Pλ and Q=I−P. For z∈Γ, resolvent commutation and the inverse equations give Rλ(z)∣M=(z−A)−1 on M. If Au=αu with u≠0, then α∉Γ by those equations and Rλ(z)u=(z−α)−1u. The equation Pu=u and its contour definition give winding number one for α, so α∈Δ. In a finite basis of M, w−A is invertible exactly when its kernel is zero [F3]; thus every spectral point of A is an eigenvalue and lies in Δ. There are at most r distinct such points, since eigenvectors for distinct eigenvalues are linearly independent: in a shortest nontrivial relation among them, applying A−αI for one term removes that term and leaves a shorter nontrivial relation. There is at least one: otherwise (z−A)−1 is holomorphic throughout a neighborhood of the closed disk, and the scalar Cauchy formula [F3] makes its contour integral zero entrywise, contradicting its integral IM and r≥1. Here the zero integral follows by applying the Cauchy formula to (z−E)(z−A)−1 at E.

4.2step 2.1step 3.1F2F3constructalgebra

[Complementary inverse on its exact domain] For w∈Δ define B(w)=(2πi)−1∮ΓRλ(z)/(z−w) dz. As in step 3.1 its range lies in D. The identity (w−Hλ)Rλ(z)=I−(z−w)Rλ(z) gives (w−Hλ)B(w)=I−P on H; its right-hand counterpart gives B(w)(w−Hλ)=I−P on D. Resolvent commutation shows B(w) commutes with P,Q. The bounded map BQ(w)=QB(w)Q therefore maps QH into D∩QH and satisfies both inverse equations for w−Hλ on that exact complementary domain. No assertion that B(w)P=0 is needed. The idempotent splitting is H=M⊕QH and, since PH⊂D and P preserves D, its domain splitting is D=M⊕(D∩QH). The complementary domain is dense in QH, since applying the bounded Q to approximants from the dense D preserves D and approximates every vector of QH.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2F2algebra

[Exactly the interior spectrum and generalized eigenspaces] If w∈Δ∖σ(A), then the bounded operator (w−A)−1P+BQ(w) maps H into D and is a two-sided inverse of w−Hλ by the domain splitting and step 4.2. If w∈σ(A), step 4.1 supplies a nonzero eigenvector in M, so w∈σ(Hλ). This proves σ(Hλ)∩Δ=σ(A), with its nonempty finite character from step 4.1. For such an eigenvalue α and an integer k≥1, any generalized eigenvector x∈D((Hλ−α)k) has Qx in the complementary iterated domain, because P,Q preserve D and commute with Hλ. Step 4.2 makes Hλ−α injective on the complement; its powers are then injective on their domains, so (Hλ−α)kQx=0 forces Qx=0. Conversely M⊂D is invariant, so every generalized eigenvector of A is a generalized eigenvector of the full operator. This proves (c), including the exact complementary inverse.

6.1step 1.1step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1step 4.2step 5.1F1F2algebra∎

[Real coupling, zero branch and assembly] The bounded-perturbation adjoint identity is D(Hλ∗)=D(H0∗)=D, Hλ∗=H0+λ‾V: subtract the everywhere-defined bounded term from the adjoint functional to identify exactly the domain of H0∗. Thus Hλ is self-adjoint for every real λ. For real λ∈Ωv, apply [F1] to this operator, again converting (Hλ−z)−1 to Rλ(z)=−(Hλ−z)−1 with multiplier (z−t)−1. Its spectrum misses the circle by step 1.1, so has positive distance from it by compactness of the circle and openness of the resolvent set. The same uniform scalar-kernel/Riemann-sum evaluation as in step 3.2 identifies Pλ with the PVM on the real interior, hence an orthogonal spectral projection on the entire cluster. If v=0, the norm definition gives V=0, all resolvents and projections are constant for every complex coupling, and the exact PVM domain gives H0P0=EP0; therefore the restriction is EI and its spectrum is {E}. Steps 1.1–5.1 give the other assertions for arbitrary H under CC, using only a finite path and finite bases; no individually ordered or holomorphic scalar branches have been introduced.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources