Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The first-order emitted-photon energy law: factorised kernel, normalisation, concentration at the transition energy and positivity on positive-measure windows

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Fix ℏ>0 and let α>0, let h=ran⁡MΠ⊆L2(R3;C3) be the transverse space with ε(k)=α∣k∣ of Transverse continuum free Fock Hamiltonian, let Λ>0, let g1,…,gJ∈h (J≥1) satisfy supp⁡gj⊆{k: 0<ε(k)≤Λ},gjε∈h, let η0∈R and let c1,…,cJ∈C with M:=∑j=1Jcjgj∈h. Fix Δ∈R and define the finite Borel measure νb(B):=∫R31B(ε(k))∥M(k)∥C32 d3k,Kt(x):=1ℏ2t∣∫0teixs/ℏ ds∣2  (t>0), and the vector-valued function Ab(k,t):=−iη0ℏM(k)∫0tei(ε(k)−Δ)s/ℏ ds(t≥0). Clause (a) includes M=0 and every real η0, including zero. Clauses (b)-(e) concern the normalized law when M≠0; no nonzero assumption on η0 is required. Then:

(a) (factorisation) for every t>0 and almost every k∈R3, ∣Ab(k,t)∣2=η02 t Kt(ε(k)−Δ)∥M(k)∥C32, and consequently ∥Ab(⋅,t)∥h2=η02t∫RKt(E−Δ) dνb(E);

(b) (normalisation) if M≠0, then for every t>0 the denominator ∫RKt(E−Δ) dνb(E) is finite and strictly positive, so Pt(B):=∫BKt(E−Δ) dνb(E)∫RKt(E−Δ) dνb(E) defines a Borel probability measure on R with Pt(R∖(0,Λ])=0;

(c) (concentration) if νb=Jbλ for some Jb∈L1(λ) with Jb=0 λ-almost everywhere on R∖(0,Λ], if Jb is continuous at some Δ with 0<Δ<Λ and Jb(Δ)>0, and if f:R→C is continuous and bounded, then lim⁡t→∞∫Rf dPt=f(Δ);

(d) (positivity) if νb=Jbλ with Jb≥0 λ-almost everywhere and Jb>0 λ-almost everywhere on a Borel set B⊆R of positive Lebesgue measure, then Pt(B)>0 for every t>0;

(e) (tail concentration) under the hypotheses of (c), for every δ>0, lim⁡t→∞Pt({E:∣E−Δ∣≥δ})=0.

No dynamics, transition probability, rate, decay or physical identification is asserted; the lemma computes an explicit kernel, its normalised push-forward law and that law's limit.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ℏ>0, α>0, the transverse space h, the cutoff data Λ,gj, the coupling η0, the coefficients cj, the vector M (nonzero only for the normalized-law claims), the number Δ, the measure νb, the kernel Kt and the vectors Ab(⋅,t).

[F1]

Transverse space and the declared cutoff data. The space h={f∈L2(R3;C3):k⋅f(k)=0 a.e.} is a closed linear subspace and ε(k)=α∣k∣ is continuous (Transverse continuum free Fock Hamiltonian clause (a)). The vectors gj, their common energy cutoff, the arbitrary complex coefficients cj and the finite sum M=∑jcjgj are the given data; no dipole-matrix or atomic-eigenvector constraint on these coefficients is assumed.

[F2]

The unchanged scalar kernel supplier. For ℏ>0, t>0 and x≠0, Kt(x)=4sin⁡2(xt/(2ℏ))/(x2t) and Kt(0)=t/ℏ2>0. The kernel is continuous, nonnegative and even, has mass 2π/ℏ, and for J∈L1(R) continuous at Δ one has ∫Kt(x)J(Δ+x) dx→(2π/ℏ)J(Δ) (Golden-rule coefficient approximate identity clauses (a),(b)). Only these scalar clauses are used; its more restricted emission-coefficient clause (c) is not applied to the present arbitrary coefficients.

[F3]

Definition of the push-forward. The set function is νb(B)=∫1B(ε(k))∥M(k)∥2d3k. Its measure property, total mass, support and nonnegative integration identity for the present arbitrary M are proved in step 1.1 directly from this definition.

[F4]

Null-set suppliers. A countable subset of Rn is Lebesgue null under CC (Every at most countable subset of Rn is Lebesgue null; in particular λ1(Q)=0). For every nonnegative Borel g on R3, ∫g(k)d3k=∫0∞∫S2g(rω)r2dσ(ω)dr, with finite sphere measure σ (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, Statement with n=3). These will prove nullity of the actual energy-level spheres, rather than inferring a null pullback from one-dimensional nullity alone.

[F5]

Measure and integration. A measure with density h satisfies (hλ)(B)=∫Bh dλ. Nonnegative integrals and finite sums are additive, increasing nonnegative simple functions approximate nonnegative Borel functions, and monotone convergence applies (The measure with density f relative to μ, Monotone convergence for the integral). Translation E=Δ+x preserves Lebesgue integrals of integrable functions (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions). A nonnegative measurable function positive on a positive-measure set has positive integral: if its integral were zero, each set on which it is at least 1/n would be null, so their countable union could not have positive measure.

[F6]

Continuity and limits. The declared continuity and limit conventions are those of Continuity of f:A→R at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim⁡x→cf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point and Limits at +∞ and −∞, and infinite limits at a point. For a complex integrable function, its integral and limits can be computed by its real and imaginary parts.

Proof

technique · direct; prove the push-forward for arbitrary coefficients, compute the amplitude, verify nullity of the actual momentum spheres, normalize, and apply the unchanged scalar approximate identity with correctly shifted test functions

Given: The data of the statement and [F1]–[F6], in particular ℏ>0; only the normalized-law claims assume M≠0.

1.1givenF1F5algebra

[Arbitrary-coefficient push-forward] Since h is linear, the finite sum M lies in it, with ∥M∥2≤∑j∣cj∣∥gj∥2<∞. The common cutoff gives M=0 a.e. outside {0<ε≤Λ}. The weight ∥M∥2 is nonnegative and integrable, and the inverse image of a Borel set under continuous ε is Borel. Thus νb is nonnegative and finite, with νb(R)=∥M∥22 and the stated support. For disjoint Borel Bi, the inverse-image indicators of their finite unions increase to the indicator of their union; monotone convergence gives countable additivity. The identity ∫f dνb=∫f(ε(k))∥M(k)∥2d3k holds first for indicators by definition, then for nonnegative simple functions by finite additivity and then for every nonnegative Borel f by monotone convergence. It also holds for integrable real or complex functions by their positive/negative or real/imaginary decompositions. All conclusions include M=0 and do not import the source's special matrix coefficients.

1.2givenF2F4F5algebra

[Exact zeros and their momentum pullback] Since Kt(0)=t/ℏ2>0, its zero set is exactly Zt={2πℏn/t:n∈Z∖{0}} by [F2], and this is countable and one-dimensionally null by [F4]. The zeros of Kt(E−Δ) form Δ+Zt. For each fixed energy E, ε−1({E}) is empty if E<0, is the singleton {0} if E=0, and is the sphere {∣k∣=E/α} if E>0. The singleton is null by [F4]. For a positive radius r0, apply the polar formula [F4] to the indicator of {∣k∣=r0}: its integral is σ(S2)∫0∞1{r0}(r)r2dr=0 because the one-dimensional singleton is null. Thus every such energy level is null in R3, and the countable union ε−1(Δ+Zt) is null by countable subadditivity. Consequently Kt(ε(k)−Δ)>0 for a.e. momentum k. This establishes the exact needed pullback statement for arbitrary real Δ.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F5algebra

[Amplitude and factorization including zero cases] For t≥0 the time integral It(E)=∫0tei(E−Δ)s/ℏds is continuous in E and bounded by t. Therefore Ab(k,t)=−(iη0/ℏ)It(ε(k))M(k) is an L2 vector with norm at most ∣η0∣t∥M∥2/ℏ, and scalar multiplication preserves transversality, so Ab(⋅,t)∈h. At t=0 it is zero. For t>0, the kernel definition gives ∣It(E)∣2=ℏ2tKt(E−Δ); hence ∥Ab(k,t)∥2=η02tKt(ε(k)−Δ)∥M(k)∥2 a.e. Integrating with step 1.1 proves the norm formula in (a). If M=0 or η0=0, both sides are zero; no division by that norm was used.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2F2F5algebra

[Normalization when M is nonzero] The defining time integral has modulus at most t, so 0≤Kt(x)≤t/ℏ2 everywhere. Thus dt:=∫Kt(E−Δ)dνb(E)≤(t/ℏ2)∥M∥22<∞. If M≠0, the set on which ∥M(k)∥2>0 has positive Lebesgue measure. By step 1.2, the product Kt(ε(k)−Δ)∥M(k)∥2 is positive a.e. on that set, and its integral is positive by [F5]. Step 1.1 makes this integral exactly dt. Hence B↦dt−1∫BKt(E−Δ)dνb(E) is a Borel probability measure, and its support is in (0,Λ] because νb has that support. This proves (b). For η0=0, Ab=0 but this formal normalized kernel law is still defined whenever M≠0; it is not asserted to arise by normalizing the zero amplitude. If M=0 then dt=0 and no normalized law is asserted.

4.1step 3.1F2F5F6algebra

[Concentration for every bounded continuous complex test] Assume (c), and let f be bounded continuous. The density equality and translation from [F5] give ∫f dPt=(∫Kt(x)f(Δ+x)Jb(Δ+x)dx)/(∫Kt(x)Jb(Δ+x)dx); both integrals are finite because Kt is bounded and Jb,fJb∈L1. The function fJb is continuous at Δ, so [F2] applied to its real and imaginary parts makes the numerator tend to (2π/ℏ)f(Δ)Jb(Δ). Applied to Jb it makes the denominator tend to (2π/ℏ)Jb(Δ)>0. The denominator is also strictly positive at every time by step 3.1. The ratio therefore tends to f(Δ), proving (c), with no restriction that the test or coefficients be real.

4.2step 1.2step 3.1F2F4F5algebra

[Positive-measure windows] Under (d), the numerator ∫BKt(E−Δ)Jb(E)dE is nonnegative and is strictly positive a.e. on the positive-measure Borel set B: Jb>0 a.e. there, and the kernel vanishes only on the countable energy set Δ+Zt from step 1.2. By [F5] its integral is positive, whereas step 3.1 gives a finite positive denominator. Thus Pt(B)>0 for every t>0, proving (d).

5.1step 4.1F6algebra

[Correctly shifted tail test] Under (c), fix δ>0 and put φδ(x)=max⁡{0,min⁡{1,2(∣x∣−δ/2)/δ}}. This is continuous, lies between zero and one, vanishes on ∣x∣≤δ/2, and equals one on ∣x∣≥δ. Use the bounded continuous function fδ(E)=φδ(E−Δ), so fδ(Δ)=φδ(0)=0. Pointwise 1{∣E−Δ∣≥δ}≤fδ(E), whence 0≤Pt({∣E−Δ∣≥δ})≤∫fδ dPt→fδ(Δ)=0 by step 4.1. This proves (e) with the required energy shift.

6.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2step 5.1∎

[Assembly and scope] Step 2.1 proves (a) including every zero case; step 3.1 proves (b) only for M≠0; steps 4.1–5.1 give the full concentration, positivity and tail claims. The arbitrary-vector push-forward was established locally in step 1.1, and the scalar kernel/approximate-identity clauses of the source were used unchanged. No dynamics, physical transition probability, rate, detector identification or normalization of a zero physical amplitude was asserted.

Remarks

  • What concentrates. Clause (c) says that the normalised energy law of the explicit single-vertex vector converges to the unit mass at the parameter Δ whenever the photon density has a continuous positive value there; clause (d) shows that at every finite time a window on which the density is positive almost everywhere still carries strictly positive probability. The two are compatible: the window probability tends to zero only for windows separated from Δ, and the convergence is of the law, not of the density.

  • No physical spike. The limit in (c) is a limit of an ideal model law as the parameter t of the explicit vector grows; it is not an assertion that a physical line is sharp or that a measurement at time t has a sharp outcome.

  • Zero coupling and zero vector. When η0=0, the explicit amplitude vanishes, but the formal kernel law Pt remains well-defined for M≠0. When M=0, only the unnormalized factorization is asserted and all amplitudes vanish; no division by ∥Ab∥ or zero denominator is made.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources