Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Closability of smooth magnetic forms with locally integrable potentials

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Let d,m,ℏ,A,V,v0 and qA,V be the magnetic form on the test core, with m,ℏ>0, A∈C∞(Rd;Rd), V∈Lloc1 real-valued and V≥−v0 almost everywhere. Then qA,V is closable on Cc∞(Rd;C) in the shifted form norm ∥u∥q,v0,ε02=qA,V[u]+(v0+ε0)∥u∥22 for every ε0>0. Its closure is a densely defined closed Hermitian form bounded below by −v0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, Dependent Choice, d≥1, m,ℏ>0, real q, smooth real A, real V∈Lloc1 with V≥−v0, and the core form qA,V.

[A1]

Countable Choice and Dependent Choice are the assumptions of the Hilbert-space, Fubini, and compact-interval integration-by-parts inputs (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

[F1]

The complex L2 pairing is a Hilbert inner product, Cc∞ is dense in L2, and Cauchy–Schwarz holds. The weak-derivative convention uses this same quotient L2 space (Magnetic quadratic-form data, Position and momentum operators on Euclidean L2, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F2]

Each ΠjA maps the core to itself and is symmetric there. On a compact rectangle this follows from one-variable integration by parts on each coordinate slice, Fubini, and the reality of Aj (Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F3]

If W=V+v0, then W≥0, W∈Lloc1, and W1/2ϕ∈L2 for every ϕ∈Cc∞: on a compact support, ∣ϕ∣ is bounded and ∫W∣ϕ∣2<∞ (Magnetic quadratic-form data).

Proof

1.1givenF1F3algebra

Fix ε0>0 and put W=V+v0. For every u∈Cc∞, ∥u∥q,v0,ε02=12m∑j=1d∥ΠjAu∥22+∥W1/2u∥22+ε0∥u∥22. This identity shows that if (un) is Cauchy in the shifted form norm, then each sequence (ΠjAun) and (W1/2un) is Cauchy in L2.

2.1givenA1F1F2F3step 1.1

Suppose additionally that ∥un∥2→0. Let wj be the L2 limit of ΠjAun. For any ϕ∈Cc∞, symmetry [F2] and Cauchy–Schwarz give ⟨wj,ϕ⟩=lim⁡n⟨ΠjAun,ϕ⟩=lim⁡n⟨un,ΠjAϕ⟩=0. Density in [F1] implies wj=0. If w0 is the L2 limit of W1/2un, then [F3] and Cauchy–Schwarz similarly give ⟨w0,ϕ⟩=lim⁡n⟨un,W1/2ϕ⟩=0 for every test function ϕ, so density gives w0=0.

3.1A1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Every term on the right side of the norm identity in step 1.1 therefore tends to zero, including ε0∥un∥22. Thus ∥un∥q,v0,ε0→0, which is exactly the closability criterion in Magnetic quadratic-form data. The completion is densely embedded in L2 because it contains the dense core, and the criterion makes that embedding injective; its form is closed by construction and retains the lower bound −v0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources