Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Yukawa kernel of the free resolvent in three dimensions

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. On L2(R3;C) use f^(ξ)=∫e−2πix⋅ξf(x) dx and the unitary extension F2. For κ>0, let Gκ(x)=e−κ∣x∣4π∣x∣(x≠0), with any value at x=0. Then Gκ∈L1∩L2, and G^κ(ξ)=14π2∣ξ∣2+κ2. Consequently convolution by Gκ is the bounded operator (−Δ+κ2)−1 on L2, with its convolution integral interpreted in the usual almost-everywhere L2 sense.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Choice and Countable Choice, the 2π Fourier convention, and κ>0.

[A1]

The Fourier transform extends unitarily to L2 and maps weak derivatives to multiplication by 2πiξj; the free operator is multiplication by 4π2∣ξ∣2 in Fourier space (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), Plancherel theorem, Free Laplacian form domain and realization).

[F1]

The polar-coordinate formula for Lebesgue measure gives, for radial h(x)=h0(∣x∣)∈L1 and ρ=∣ξ∣>0, h^(ξ)=2ρ∫0∞rh0(r)sin⁡(2πρr) dr; at ξ=0 it gives 4π∫0∞r2h0(r) dr (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F2]

Tonelli/Fubini applies to nonnegative or integrable functions on the completed Euclidean product, and Schwartz functions are dense in L2 (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability, Schwartz space is dense in L2).

[F4]

For h∈L1∩L2, its integral Fourier transform represents its Plancherel transform almost everywhere; equivalently, their regular tempered distributions agree under the fixed 2π convention (Agreement of the integral and L2 transforms, Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms).

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1], [F2], [F3], [F4], and κ>0.

1.1givenalgebra

Spherical coordinates give ∥Gκ∥1=∫0∞re−κr dr=κ−2,∥Gκ∥22=14π∫0∞e−2κr dr=18πκ. Thus both norms are finite; the point value at the origin does not affect the Lp class.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

For ρ=∣ξ∣>0, [F1] and the elementary integral ∫0∞e−κrsin⁡(ar) dr=a/(κ2+a2) for a>0 give G^κ(ξ)=12πρ∫0∞e−κrsin⁡(2πρr) dr=1κ2+4π2ρ2. At ξ=0, direct integration gives G^κ(0)=∫0∞re−κr dr=κ−2, the same formula.

2.2F2F3step 1.1algebra

Put M=∥Gκ∥1>0 and A(x)=∫Gκ(y)∣f(x−y)∣2dy. Tonelli and translation invariance [F2, F3] give ∫A(x)dx=M∥f∥22, so A(x)<∞ for almost every x. For each such x, ∫Gκ(y)∣f(x−y)∣dy≤(M+A(x))/2<∞ by 2t≤1+t2, so define b(x)=∫Gκ(y)f(x−y)dy. Expanding the nonnegative integral ∫Gκ(y)∣f(x−y)−b(x)/M∣2dy gives 0≤A(x)−∣b(x)∣2/M, hence ∣b(x)∣2≤MA(x). Integrating yields ∥Gκ∗f∥22≤M2∥f∥22. Therefore convolution is defined almost everywhere and gives a bounded operator on L2.

3.1A1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.2step 2.1algebra

If f is Schwartz, then Gκ∗f∈L1 by Fubini and translation invariance [F3], and lies in L2 by step 2.2. Fubini in the ordinary Fourier integral gives the integral-transform identity Gκ∗f^=G^κf^. Since Gκ∗f∈L1∩L2, [F4] identifies its integral transform with its Plancherel transform almost everywhere; the same interface identifies f^ with F2f almost everywhere. Thus F2(Gκ∗f)=G^κF2f as L2 classes. Since ∣G^κ(ξ)∣≤∥Gκ∥1 by the integral definition of the Fourier transform, multiplication by G^κ is bounded on L2. Schwartz density and boundedness of convolution therefore extend the identity to all f∈L2.

4.1A1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

By [A1], −Δ is the multiplier 4π2∣ξ∣2. Therefore (4π2∣ξ∣2+κ2)−1 is the bounded inverse multiplier of −Δ+κ2; its product with the latter multiplier is 1, and its range lies in the operator domain because 4π2∣ξ∣2/(4π2∣ξ∣2+κ2)≤1. Step 3.1 identifies the same multiplier for convolution, so convolution is exactly (−Δ+κ2)−1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources