How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Yukawa kernel of the free resolvent in three dimensions
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. On use and the unitary extension . For , let with any value at . Then , and Consequently convolution by is the bounded operator on , with its convolution integral interpreted in the usual almost-everywhere sense.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Choice and Countable Choice, the Fourier convention, and .
The Fourier transform extends unitarily to and maps weak derivatives to multiplication by ; the free operator is multiplication by in Fourier space (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (), Plancherel theorem, Free Laplacian form domain and realization).
The polar-coordinate formula for Lebesgue measure gives, for radial and , ; at it gives (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
Tonelli/Fubini applies to nonnegative or integrable functions on the completed Euclidean product, and Schwartz functions are dense in (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability, Schwartz space is dense in L2).
Translations preserve Lebesgue measure (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation).
For , its integral Fourier transform represents its Plancherel transform almost everywhere; equivalently, their regular tempered distributions agree under the fixed convention (Agreement of the integral and L2 transforms, Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms).
Proof
Given: [A1], [F1], [F2], [F3], [F4], and .
Spherical coordinates give Thus both norms are finite; the point value at the origin does not affect the class.
For , [F1] and the elementary integral for give At , direct integration gives , the same formula.
Put and . Tonelli and translation invariance [F2, F3] give , so for almost every . For each such , by , so define . Expanding the nonnegative integral gives , hence . Integrating yields . Therefore convolution is defined almost everywhere and gives a bounded operator on .
If is Schwartz, then by Fubini and translation invariance [F3], and lies in by step 2.2. Fubini in the ordinary Fourier integral gives the integral-transform identity . Since , [F4] identifies its integral transform with its Plancherel transform almost everywhere; the same interface identifies with almost everywhere. Thus as classes. Since by the integral definition of the Fourier transform, multiplication by is bounded on . Schwartz density and boundedness of convolution therefore extend the identity to all .
By [A1], is the multiplier . Therefore is the bounded inverse multiplier of ; its product with the latter multiplier is , and its range lies in the operator domain because . Step 3.1 identifies the same multiplier for convolution, so convolution is exactly .
Depends on
Free Laplacian form domain and realization
Plancherel theorem
Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms
Agreement of the integral and L2 transforms
Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability
Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation
Schwartz space is dense in L2
The Axiom of Choice
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()