Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scalar spectral measures of a separable positive generator under countable choice

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let H≠{0} be a separable complex Hilbert space with inner product linear in its first argument. Let K:D(K)→H be densely defined, self-adjoint and positive, meaning ⟨Kx,x⟩≥0 for x∈D(K). Let (Ut)t∈R be a strongly continuous unitary group with generator iK: its strong derivative at zero exists exactly on D(K) and equals iKx. The spectrum σ(K) is the complement of the set of z for which K−z:D(K)→H has a bounded everywhere-defined inverse.

For every x,y∈H there is a finite complex Borel measure μx,y on [0,∞) such that

⟨Utx,y⟩=∫[0,∞)eitE dμx,y(E),∣μx,y∣([0,∞))≤∥x∥ ∥y∥.

The measures are sesquilinear in (x,y), μx:=μx,x is positive with total mass ∥x∥2, and every μx,y is carried by σ(K). If P0 is the orthogonal projection onto ker⁡K, then

μx,y({0})=⟨P0x,y⟩.

In particular, if σ(K)⊆{0}∪[g,∞) with g>0, the measures μ(I−P0)x,(I−P0)y are carried by [g,∞). Spectral measures and a projection-valued spectral resolution are not assumptions of this statement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Hilbert space, positive self-adjoint generator and unitary group in the Statement.

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed throughout. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Under Countable Choice a self-adjoint operator is closed, its range orthogonal complement is the kernel of its adjoint, and every closed Hilbert subspace has an orthogonal complement decomposition. Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators The adjoint is well defined, closed, and reverses inclusions Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace

[F2]

Finite Hermitian matrices have orthonormal eigenbases with real eigenvalues; the polynomial norm estimate needed here is derived in step 2.1. Hilbert adjoints satisfy the adjoint and norm identities under Countable Choice. Finite matrix spectral and state calculus Hilbert-adjoint identities

[F3]

Real polynomials are uniformly dense in continuous functions on a compact interval, and operator-norm Cauchy sequences of bounded Hilbert operators converge. Complex approximation follows by approximating real and imaginary parts. Polynomials are uniformly dense in C([a,b],R) for every closed interval If (Y) is Banach then (\mathcal B(X,Y)) is Banach

[F4]

A positive normalized functional on real continuous functions on a compact metric space has a Borel probability representation under Countable Choice, with no Dependent Choice assumption. A compact-metric probability representation using countable choice

[F5]

Dominated convergence and scalar Fubini apply with their stated measure and integrability hypotheses. Dominated convergence Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product

[F6]

A lambda-system containing a pi-system contains the sigma-algebra it generates. Dynkin's pi-lambda theorem

[F7]

The real exponential is smooth with derivative itself, and its inverse logarithm has derivative 1/s. The C1 change-of-variables theorem applies to nonnegative Lebesgue integrands under Countable Choice; applying it to the four signed real/imaginary parts gives the absolutely integrable complex version. The continuous-curve fundamental theorem applies on each compact interval, also for Hilbert-valued curves. A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡ The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t Fundamental theorem of calculus for Banach-valued continuous curves

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1]–[F7] and the Statement data.

1.1A1F1givenalgebra

Positivity gives ∥(I+K)x∥≥∥x∥ on D(K), by pairing (I+K)x with x. Its range is closed: if (I+K)xn converges, the bound makes xn Cauchy, and Kxn=(I+K)xn−xn converges, so closedness in [F1] identifies the limit in D(K). The range has zero orthogonal complement because ker⁡(I+K)∗=ker⁡(I+K)=0; [F1] makes the closed range all of H. Thus B=(I+K)−1 exists, ∥B∥≤1, ker⁡B=0 and ran⁡B=D(K) is dense. For x=(I+K)u and y=(I+K)v, symmetry gives ⟨Bx,y⟩=⟨x,By⟩, while ⟨Bx,x⟩=∥u∥2+⟨Ku,u⟩≥0. Hence B is a positive self-adjoint contraction and KB=I−B.

1.2F5F6givenconstruct

We shall use uniqueness of finite complex measures on [0,1] from their continuous integrals. If their difference ν integrates every continuous function to zero, then for any relatively open O⊆[0,1] the continuous functions fn(b)=min⁡(1,ndist⁡(b,[0,1]∖O)) increase to 1O; take fn=1 when O=[0,1]. Dominated convergence against its finite total variation gives ν(O)=0. Since also ν([0,1])=0, the sets where ν vanishes form a lambda-system. The relatively open sets form a generating pi-system, so [F6] proves ν=0 on all Borel sets. This also applies to any finite linear combination of positive measures.

1.3F3F5F7givenconstruct

Scalar Laplace uniqueness will identify the evolution. If a bounded continuous h:[0,∞)→C satisfies ∫0∞e−zth(t) dt=0 for every real z>0, apply [F7] to the C1 diffeomorphism t↦s=e−t from (0,∞) to (0,1), with inverse −log⁡s and absolute Jacobian e−t=s, and take z=n+1. The endpoints have Lebesgue measure zero; boundedness of h makes the complex integrands absolutely integrable. Then ∫01snh(−log⁡s) ds=0 for all integers n≥0, with any value assigned at s=0. Polynomial approximation [F3] implies the same equality against every continuous test on [0,1]. If h(t0)≠0, multiplication by a constant complex phase and continuity give a time interval on which its real part is strictly positive. A nonnegative continuous piecewise-linear hat supported inside the corresponding interval of s has strictly positive integral against that real part, contradicting the preceding test identity. For t0=0 use a one-sided time neighborhood and a smaller interior interval. Therefore h=0.

2.1F2F3step 1.1constructalgebra

Fix a dense sequence in H and let Pn be the projection onto the span of its first n terms. Finite Gram–Schmidt, skipping zero remainders and using positive real normalizations, constructs these projections deterministically, and density gives Pnx→x for every x. The compression Bn=PnBPn is a positive contraction on that finite-dimensional span and zero on its complement. For every complex polynomial p, diagonalize the compression using [F2], with eigenvalues bj∈[0,1]. For x=∑jcjej+x⊥ its squared image norm is ∑j∣p(bj)∣2∣cj∣2+∣p(0)∣2∥x⊥∥2≤(sup⁡0≤b≤1∣p(b)∣)2∥x∥2. Thus ∥p(Bn)∥≤sup⁡0≤b≤1∣p(b)∣, including the zero complement. Boundedness and strong convergence Bn→B imply p(Bn)x→p(B)x by induction on powers. Hence the same norm bound holds for p(B). By [F3], polynomial approximations define f(B) for every f∈C([0,1];C), independently of the approximation, with ∥f(B)∥≤∥f∥∞. Norm limits preserve sums, products, the identity and conjugate adjoints. If f≥0, approximating its continuous square root gives f(B)=f(B)∗f(B)≥0. This constructs the required continuous calculus without a spectral theorem.

2.2F1F7step 1.1givenconstructalgebra

For z>0 the strong improper integral Rzx=∫0∞e−ztUtx dt exists. The identity ∥Utx−Usx∥=∥(Ut−s−I)x∥ and strong continuity at zero give uniform norm-continuity of the orbit, and the scalar exponential factor is uniformly continuous on each finite interval by its bounded derivative. Hence on a finite interval the integrand is uniformly norm-continuous, so uniform-mesh Riemann sums are Cauchy in H; their tails have norm at most e−zT∥x∥/z. Thus Rz is bounded by 1/z. The group law makes UtD(K)=D(K) and KUtx=UtKx by difference quotients. For x∈D(K) the same Riemann sums converge also after applying K, and closedness gives differentiation/integration in its graph. The continuous-curve fundamental theorem [F7], followed by the exponentially small endpoint limit, applied to (e−ztUtx)′=e−zt(iK−z)Utx yields (z−iK)Rzx=x. The estimate ∥(z−iK)x∥2=z2∥x∥2+∥Kx∥2, closedness and the zero kernel of the adjoint z+iK show that z−iK is onto with inverse norm at most 1/z, just as in step 1.1. Density extends Rz=(z−iK)−1 to every x.

3.1F4step 1.2step 2.1constructalgebra

For x≠0, the real functional f↦⟨f(B)x,x⟩/∥x∥2 is positive and normalized. Apply [F4] on [0,1] and multiply its probability measure by ∥x∥2, obtaining a positive measure νx; set ν0=0. Its continuous integrals are ⟨f(B)x,x⟩, first for real f, then for complex f by linearity. Define νx,y=14∑j=03ijνx+ijy. Polarization gives ∫f dνx,y=⟨f(B)x,y⟩. Uniqueness from step 1.2 makes these measures linear in x, conjugate-linear in y, with νy,x=νx,y‾ and diagonal νx,x=νx. Their total masses are ⟨x,y⟩. Because the representing measure is unique, this defines the entire indexed family without an uncountable choice of representatives.

4.1step 3.1algebra

For every Borel D, the form (x,y)↦νx,y(D) is positive sesquilinear. Expanding its nonnegative value on x+cy, and minimizing over c∈C (with the zero-diagonal case treated by arbitrary large multiples), gives ∣νx,y(D)∣2≤νx(D)νy(D). On any finite Borel partition (Dj), finite scalar Cauchy–Schwarz now gives ∑j∣νx,y(Dj)∣≤∑jνx(Dj)∑jνy(Dj)≤∥x∥ ∥y∥. Taking the partition supremum yields ∣νx,y∣([0,1])≤∥x∥ ∥y∥. In particular all bounded measurable scalar functions are integrable against these measures.

4.2step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1algebra

For continuous f,h, multiplicativity of the calculus gives ∫h dνf(B)x,y=⟨h(B)f(B)x,y⟩=∫hf dνx,y. Step 1.2 implies dνf(B)x,y=f dνx,y as measures. Conjugate symmetry yields dνf(B)x=∣f∣2dνx; in particular ∥f(B)x∥2=∫∣f∣2 dνx. These identities use only continuous factors and scalar measures, not a postulated Borel operator calculus.

5.1step 1.1step 4.1step 4.2algebra

Since νBz({0})=0 by step 4.2, step 4.1 makes its mixed measure with any vector zero on {0}. Hence νx({0})=νx−Bz({0})≤∥x−Bz∥2. The dense range from step 1.1 allows this upper bound to be arbitrarily small, proving νx({0})=0 and then νx,y({0})=0 for all x,y. Thus no zero-endpoint mass is hidden by the reciprocal change of variable below.

5.2step 4.1step 4.2algebra

If a real b0 is in the resolvent of B, let L=(B−b0)−1. For every positive integer n, step 4.2 with x=Lnz gives dνz=∣b−b0∣2ndνLnz. Thus on ∣b−b0∣<ε, νz({∣b−b0∣<ε})≤(ε∥L∥)2n∥z∥2. Choose ε∥L∥<1 and let n→∞. The neighborhood is null for every diagonal measure and therefore for every mixed measure by step 4.1. The real resolvent set is open by the inverse Neumann series. It is covered by the rational intervals contained in these null neighborhoods; this is a subfamily of a fixed countable base. Countable subadditivity proves that all νx,y are carried by σ(B)∩[0,1].

5.3F1F5step 1.1step 4.1step 4.2constructalgebra

The identity in step 4.2 makes (Bnx) Cauchy: for n,m≥N its squared difference is at most 4∫[0,1)b2Ndνx, which tends to zero by [F5]. Let its limit be Px. Again ∥(B−I)Bnx∥2=∫(1−b)2b2ndνx→0, so Px∈ker⁡(I−B). For y in this kernel, self-adjointness gives ⟨Bnx,y⟩=⟨x,y⟩, and therefore x−Px is orthogonal to the kernel. Thus P is its orthogonal projection by [F1]. This kernel equals ker⁡K, since KB=I−B. Dominated convergence in ⟨Bnx,y⟩=∫bndνx,y gives νx,y({1})=⟨P0x,y⟩.

6.1F5step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1algebra

On (0,1] put λ(b)=b−1−1 and define gx,y(t)=∫eitλ(b)dνx,y(b), omitting the null endpoint by step 5.1. It is bounded and continuous by dominated convergence and step 4.1. For z>0, scalar Fubini, applied to the finite positive measures in the polarization formula, gives its Laplace transform as ∫(z−iλ(b))−1dνx,y(b). The reciprocal is the continuous function rz(b)=bzb−i(1−b),rz(0)=0. By step 2.1, rz(B)=B(zB−i(I−B))−1, and KB=I−B shows (z−iK)rz(B)=I on H. Step 2.2 identifies this with Rz. Thus gx,y and ⟨Utx,y⟩ have equal Laplace transforms. Step 1.3 gives equality for t≥0; conjugate symmetry and U−t=Ut∗ give it for negative t as well.

6.2step 1.1step 4.1step 5.1step 5.2step 5.3constructalgebra

Push νx,y∣(0,1] forward by λ to obtain μx,y. Positivity, total mass, sesquilinearity and the variation bound pass to the pushforward. If E≥0 is in the resolvent of K and b0=(1+E)−1, the bounded inverse identity (B−b0)−1=−(1+E)I−(1+E)2(K−E)−1 follows by multiplying on D(K)=ran⁡B. Therefore b0 is in the resolvent of B. Step 5.2 and the homeomorphism (0,1]→[0,∞) show that the pushed measures are carried by σ(K). Their atom at E=0 is the atom at b=1, computed in step 5.3. All these statements include vectors in the ground subspace and the possibility that the excited subspace is zero.

7.1A1step 6.1step 6.2algebra∎

Step 6.1 proves the Fourier pairing formula, and step 6.2 proves the remaining measure properties. For Q=I−P0, its measures have zero atom at zero by that formula for the atom and are carried by σ(K); the stated gap therefore places them in [g,∞). Every construction used only [A1] and the displayed suppliers; no general spectral theorem or existence of a PVM was invoked.

Remarks

The source's unbounded spectral theorem supplies context for the standard spectral interface. The proof above reconstructs only the scalar/cross measures needed here, on a separable Hilbert space under Countable Choice, rather than importing the source theorem or the canonical full-Choice spectral construction.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources