Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fixed-order integration-by-parts and leading-equation field-redefinition relations

Statement

Assume full AC. Use four-dimensional natural units c=ℏ=1 and a finite jet-polynomial field model with its declared finite rational action of a complex reductive affine algebraic group G. Let WD be a finite raw local-polynomial space at fixed engineering weight D, derivative cutoff, and field-degree cutoff; let VD=WDG. Let R~D be the G-stable linear span in WD of the declared polynomial identities, admitted total-divergence densities, and leading-equation densities FaEa(0) defined below, with RD=R~D∩VD. The finite-order invariant operator quotient is QD=VD/RD.

Let M=R1,3 with x0=ct, η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), and volume measure d4x. Even field components are smooth maps M→Φa0ˉ and odd components are smooth coefficient families in a fixed Grassmann algebra valued in Φa1ˉ; admitted variations and currents have compact support. Let I[L]=∫ML d4x on admitted local densities, with the boundary convention I(∂μJμ)=0. Let S0[ϕ] and each Sj[ϕ] be G-invariant local polynomial functionals of these field configurations, so their formal Taylor expansions through order N are defined. Let the variational derivative Ea(0)[ϕ] of S0 be defined by

DS0[ϕ](h)=I ⁣(∑ahaEa(0)[ϕ])

for every admitted compactly supported parity-compatible variation h. A leading-equation relation is a density FaEa(0) with Fa[ϕ] a smooth function of x and finitely many component jets of ϕ at x, with this density in WD, and satisfying the following conditions: its component parity matches that of ϕa; it is G-equivariant, meaning F[g⋅ϕ]=g⋅F[ϕ]; and it preserves compact support, meaning supp⁡F[ϕ]⊆supp⁡ϕ for compactly supported ϕ. At each configuration where the action identities below are applied, require F[ϕ] itself to be an admitted compactly supported variation, so the stated first-variation identity applies to this direction. An integration-by-parts relation is a density ∂μJμ satisfying the stated boundary convention. Consider a finite formal action Sϵ=S0+∑j=1NϵjSj in the ring C[ϵ]/(ϵN+1), where ϵ is dimensionless and each ϵkFa has the units of ϕa. For every 1≤k≤N, the local identity-leading change of variables Ψk(ϕ)=ϕ−ϵkF[ϕ] is invertible as a formal map through order N and satisfies

Sϵ[Ψk(ϕ)]=Sϵ[ϕ]−ϵkI ⁣(FaEa(0)[ϕ])+O(ϵk+1).

Thus a coefficient +ϵkI(FaEa(0)) can be removed at order k without changing lower-order coefficients, provided all induced terms through the retained order are kept. The quotient QD identifies exactly the declared polynomial, boundary, and leading-equation relation span; it asserts no equivalence of arbitrary off-shell Green functions and does not by itself assert a quantum measure or amplitude equivalence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; the finite field and jet data; a finite-dimensional rational G-module WD with G-stable relation subspace R~D; a compact-support/no-boundary action functional I; G-invariant local polynomial actions S0,S1,…,SN with the stated variational-derivative convention; and a finite formal truncation ϵN+1=0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; this is explicitly part of the hypothesis of the invariant-quotient lemma used below.

[F1]

Finite-jet local operators and engineering dimension: the operator module is a finite complex supercommutative polynomial module on a finite jet representation, with fixed derivative/field cutoffs and a declared rational G-action.

[F2]

Finite-order invariant operator-basis quotient: for VD=WDG and RD=R~D∩VD, the exact declared operator quotient is QD=VD/RD.

[F3]

Exactness of invariant vectors for a finite-dimensional quotient: for finite-dimensional rational G-module WD and G-stable R~D, the canonical map WDG/(WDG∩R~D)→(WD/R~D)G is an isomorphism under AC and complex reductivity.

[A2]

Boundary convention: every admitted current Jμ has compact support in M=R1,3, and I(∂μJμ)=0.

[A3]

Variational convention: Ea(0) is the left Euler derivative for odd fields and the ordinary Euler derivative for even fields, characterized by the displayed first-variation identity for every admitted h.

[A4]

Formal-map convention: ϵN+1=0, each Fa is smooth in x and finitely many field jets, has the stated parity, equivariance, and support properties, F[ϕ] is an admitted compactly supported variation at each configuration considered, and Ψk=id⁡−ϵkF is considered through order N using its finite Taylor expansion in ϵ.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F3

The quotient map WD→WD/R~D is equivariant because R~D is G-stable. By F1 its source is a finite-dimensional rational module, so under A1 we can apply F3 and conclude that its restriction to invariants is surjective.

1.2givenA2

An admitted integration-by-parts density is ∂μJμ with compactly supported Jμ. Its action integral is zero by A2, so adding such a density does not change the action functional under the stated boundary convention.

1.3givenA3A4algebra

By A3 and the admissibility condition in A4, the first variation of S0 in direction −ϵkF is −ϵkI(FaEa(0)). The formal Taylor terms of degree at least two in the displacement have powers at least ϵ2k, which are in O(ϵk+1) because k≥1.

1.4givenA4constructalgebra

To construct a formal inverse through order N, use A4 and seek Φk=id⁡+∑m=kNϵmHm. Because F is smooth in finitely many jet coordinates, each coefficient of F(Φk(ϕ)) through order N is defined by a finite Taylor expansion. At order k, the coefficient of Ψk∘Φk−id⁡ is Hk−F, so choose Hk=F. At each subsequent order m, that coefficient is Hm plus an expression determined by the previously chosen Hk,…,Hm−1; choosing Hm as its negative cancels it. The recursion is finite, and every coefficient depends on finitely many jets, so it yields a local right inverse modulo ϵN+1. The same recursion gives a left inverse, and a left and right inverse of one map agree; thus Ψk is formally invertible.

2.1givenF2step 1.1algebra

The kernel of the restricted invariant map is WDG∩R~D=RD. By F2, its domain modulo this kernel is exactly QD, so the first isomorphism theorem gives the canonical isomorphism QD≅(WD/R~D)G and fixes the quotient's declared relation scope.

2.2givenstep 1.3algebra

For each j≥1, substituting ϕ−ϵkF into ϵjSj changes it first at degree ϵj+k, at least ϵk+1. Combining this with step 1.3 gives the displayed expansion for Sϵ∘Ψk.

3.1givenstep 2.2step 1.4F2∎

If the order-k action contains +ϵkI(FaEa(0)), the negative term in step 2.2 cancels it, while the substitutions in all Sj with j≥1 begin above order k. Step 1.4 makes this an allowed invertible local field redefinition; its induced higher-order terms remain part of the transformed truncated action. No off-shell or quantum-measure conclusion follows from this action-level calculation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources